Re: Duplicate bugs: shall we follow strict chronological order?

2021-02-13 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Marcus wrote: > Am 11.02.21 um 09:03 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > > I want to mark some duplicate bugs and I have a question. > > for your example, see comments inline. > > > Suppose the bugs are numbered 2, 4, and 6. I have been working on > > number

Re: Duplicate bugs: shall we follow strict chronological order?

2021-02-11 Thread Czesław Wolański
Hi Arrigo, Marcus, @Arrigo Thanks for bringing this up. @Marcus Thank you for this extensive explanation. It will surely help me a lot in my bug hunting tusks - ykwim. ;‑) "Exception that proves the rule". Regards, Czesław чт, 11 февр. 2021 г. в 09:46, Marcus : > Am 11.02.21 um 09:03 schrieb

Re: Duplicate bugs: shall we follow strict chronological order?

2021-02-11 Thread Marcus
Am 11.02.21 um 09:03 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: I want to mark some duplicate bugs and I have a question. for your example, see comments inline. Suppose the bugs are numbered 2, 4, and 6. I have been working on number 4, because I did not know about number 2. For this reason, number 4 has

Duplicate bugs: shall we follow strict chronological order?

2021-02-11 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Dear All, I want to mark some duplicate bugs and I have a question. Suppose the bugs are numbered 2, 4, and 6. I have been working on number 4, because I did not know about number 2. For this reason, number 4 has more comments on BugZilla and my GitHub PR refers to it. I will declare that no.