Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 06:26 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > We can't do that easily in Pagure. We could use a different > namespace, but namespaces are not browseable (at least not yet; only > user groups are browseable which is a different thing). Send patches ;) I've had quite a few patches merged

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-14 Thread Josef Skladanka
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 14:16 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > > I am personaly against issues/pull requests on Pagure - logging into > Phab > > is about as difficult as logging into Pagure, and I don't see the

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-13 Thread Kamil Paral
> This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit > more detail out. > > Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git > projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and > it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 11:13 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:21:16 -0700 > Tim Flink wrote: > > > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit > > more detail out. > > > > Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-10 Thread Tim Flink
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:21:16 -0700 Tim Flink wrote: > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit > more detail out. > > Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git > projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-09 Thread Harold Dost
I would second that. Harold Dost | @hdost On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Martin Krizek wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Tim Flink" >> To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Monday, January

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-09 Thread Martin Krizek
- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 5:21:16 PM > Subject: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure > > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit > more detail

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

2017-01-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:21 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit > more detail out. > > Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git > projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and > it's not free