On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:03:17 +0200
Alexander Todorov atodo...@redhat.com wrote:
На 22.01.2014 10:42, Kamil Paral написа:
Phabricator is capable of hosting repositories but it would require
some reconfiguration and testing. The feature is a newer addition
and I'd want to test it a bit in
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:53:20 -0700
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:51:50 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
I was able to get the root uri display a similar page as what a
logged in user can see:
https://phab.qadevel
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:01:21 -0500 (EST)
Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com wrote:
I wonder if we should enable authentication through providers like
GitHub instead of just username/password (and FAS in the future).
This would make it easier for non-fas users to report bugs or
contribute to the
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:57:53 -0700
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:42:51 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Phabricator is capable of hosting repositories but it would
require some reconfiguration and testing. The feature is a newer
addition
After a conversation with Kamil earlier today, I started looking into
making our phabricator instance a bit more public friendly.
Blender's instance is a good example of what I'd like to see ours do in
terms of sidebar configuration and public landing page:
https://developer.blender.org/
The
Over the last couple of days, a lot of tickets have been created and
all of those tickets have sent messages here. While I see some benefit
to having all these tickets emailed out to the list, I'm also a bit
worried that they can start drowning out other non-ticket conversations
on the list.
I'm
tflink lowered the priority of this task from High to Low.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a comment.
This doesn't need to be high priority, changing to low since we haven't seen
it for a while
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T34
To: tflink
Cc:
tflink lowered the priority of this task from High to Wishlist.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a comment.
This is something that would be nice to have, but isn't critical. Changing
priority to wishlist
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T33
To: tflink
tflink added a dependent task: T28: Taskotron Phase 1
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T41
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
tflink added a dependency: T41: Phase 1 Taskotron Runner
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T28
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
tflink created this task.
tflink added subscribers: qa-devel, tflink.
tflink added a project: taskotron
TASK DESCRIPTION
In order to use the PUATP checks from AutoQA (rpmlint, rpmguard, depcheck,
upgradepath) in taskotron, they need to be ported first. This is the tracking
ticket for getting
tflink added a dependent task: T28: Taskotron Phase 1
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T38
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
tflink created this task.
tflink added subscribers: qa-devel, tflink.
tflink added a project: taskotron
TASK DESCRIPTION
Taskotron tasks will be triggered by fedmsg messages. Specific task types
will be scheduled based on these incoming fedmsg messages.
The trigger is responsible for
tflink added a dependent task: T28: Taskotron Phase 1
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T39
To: roshi, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:57:05 -0700
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:21:28 -0700
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
# Fedora QA Devel Meeting
# Date: 2014-01-13
# Time: 17:00 - 19:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location
==
#fedora-blocker-review: fedoraqa-devel
==
After much fun with finding an open channel for the meeting, we did get
through a bunch of stuff. At the moment, no more meetings are planned
and we will schedule more as
=
#fedora-meeting-2: fedoraqa-devel
=
We didn't quite get through everything today, so we'll continue after
the QA meeting on Monday.
I'll be sending an announcement for that meeting shortly.
Minutes:
tflink closed this task as Invalid.
tflink claimed this task.
tflink added a comment.
This is a duplicate of T21 - closing.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T27
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a comment.
T27 was filed as a duplicate
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T21
To: mkrizek, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, mkrizek, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
test corrections were needed,
but they still need to be fixed.
- Tim Flink
On Dec. 10, 2013, 3:56 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/58
There still seems to be a bit of confusion as to the current state of
the beaker deployment that we've been working on for Fedora.
To improve clarity on the exact state of the current install, I've made
some changes to what was formerly beaker.fedoraproject.org:
- The beaker server is now
tflink created this task.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
There was a feature request to be able to tell which bugs in the lists have
changed blocker state (as opposed to the bugzilla state change that we
currently highlight) in the last
tflink created this task.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
I got a report of a failed proposal today where the form said there were
errors but everything looks fine and no details were provided.
There is currently no logging of form
tflink closed this task as Resolved.
tflink added a comment.
ask kparal to let us know if he sees it again
I will.
Thanks, hopefully it was fixed with the hotfixed python-fedora-flask. Closing
the ticket since that hotfix was deployed.
Btw, is it possible to easily quote a previous
tflink closed this task as Resolved.
tflink added a comment.
This is being filed as a retrospective, it's already been fixed.
It turns out that this only happens to users who are members of many FAS groups
(more than 17 - that was the highest number of groups for a successful login
that we
tflink created this task.
tflink assigned this task to mkrizek.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
Earlier today, we got a report of the production app throwing 503 errors but
the errors went away shortly after. At first glance, it appears
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:46:07 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks. Do you intend to forward all ticket changes to qa-devel
mailing lists?
I've been going back and forth on that one. On the one hand, that
makes it much easier to follow what's going on. On the other
tl;dr - taskbot is now taskotron
'taskbot' is a name I came up with while sitting at PyCon US in March,
looking for a name I could use while seeing if any of this could even
work.
Unfortunately, it never dawned on me to check with legal before moving
farther forward and now we're in a situation
After a bit more work than I was hoping and some email issues with
RHIT (I haven't been working on this the _whole_ time :-P), I have a new
phabricator instance up and running in the fedora cloud.
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
The SSL certs are self signed, so you'll get the
tried before :)
- Tim Flink
On Oct. 17, 2013, 9:20 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/56
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:27:07 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
With the conversation we've been having and the persona
developments, I propose the following:
- create FAS groups for git-taskbot-core and git-taskbot-tasks
which will control access to the git repos
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/55/#review116
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Tim Flink
On Oct. 16, 2013
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
I've been kicking this idea around for a bit and have chatted a
little with people on IRC but as we're looking to start up
development on taskbot, I want to have a larger discussion on two
issues: where do we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:04:21 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Hosting Phabricator on OpenShift Online may be another possibility
worth looking at:
https://github.com/CodeBlock/phabricator-openshift-quickstart
Interesting,
good other than my question about url munging vs. changing how
the settings are done. Thoughts?
- Tim Flink
On Oct. 11, 2013, 11:01 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:50:36 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2013 10:52 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
You all are using gerrit, right? Have you been happy with it WRT
features, maintenance etc? I've been getting the impression
to staging assuming that I can get
access to it
Thanks,
Tim Flink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
292e7db86a207236b4bfa63ef96f5e58de797d58
.gitignore c5f8d92163a31685a35109eb4847315d9ebcd220
Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/53/diff/
Testing
---
Have tested on my local machine, will deploy to staging assuming that I can get
access to it
Thanks,
Tim Flink
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:28:52 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:21:44 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take
the opporunity to update the qa machines.
The downtime shouldn't be very
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:04:15 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:28:52 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:21:44 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take
With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take the
opporunity to update the qa machines.
The downtime shouldn't be very but there may be a delay in some test
runs in autoqa.
I'll send out another email when it's all done.
Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:21:44 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
With the scheduled maintenance for fedora infra, I'm going to take the
opporunity to update the qa machines.
The downtime shouldn't be very but there may be a delay in some test
runs in autoqa.
I'll send out another
On Sept. 24, 2013, 3:44 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
I attempted to test this on an el6 machine, got a traceback when doing
sync. tb added to trac ticket
Martin Krizek wrote:
Yeah, python-webassets needs to be installed, it's missing in Requires
(and in epel repo, it's present
this needs a gpl header
sass/admin_layout.scss
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment139
this needs to be recompiled before merging into develop
Overall, looks good. Please fix the last minor issues and get this merged into
develop
- Tim Flink
On Sept. 25, 2013, 8:11
/#comment142
this shouldn't be added
blockerbugs/cli.py
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment143
this should be removed
missed some minor issues
- Tim Flink
On Sept. 26, 2013, 6:44 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote
partner-bugzilla in stg
Thanks,
Tim Flink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
in stg
Thanks,
Tim Flink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
works
- you can now do proposals against partner-bugzilla in stg
Thanks,
Tim Flink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Makefile 292e7db86a207236b4bfa63ef96f5e58de797d58
Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/49/diff/
Testing
---
I've tested this locally and deployed it in staging to make sure the fix works
- you can now do proposals against partner-bugzilla in stg
Thanks,
Tim Flink
blends in too much. What do you think about using
$fedoraPurple or the same yellow that the new indicator uses?
Overall, I like the addition but I would like to see some more visual
difference from the surrounding text
- Tim Flink
On Aug. 21, 2013, 8:29 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote
On Aug. 15, 2013, 4:29 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
the sync crashed for me when I tried to run it, will put the tb in trac
since I don't know how to do preformatted text in a review.
On a side note, those css diffs make me want to migrate to foundation 4
even more than before - that's
glad to see this getting done!
- Tim Flink
On Aug. 8, 2013, 2:38 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/40
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:23:33 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
After looking at the jobstats on autoqa-stg over the last day or so
since I changed all of the clients to be fc18, I'm happy enough with
the completion rates to suggest that we upgrade production autoqa and
get rid of our
restrictions)
Overall looks good to me, feel free to push the code after fixing the last
issue - no need for another round of review
- Tim Flink
On July 3, 2013, 2:50 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:26:01 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
If we rework the infra, I want to ansible-ize everything. The current
by-hand method of admin is crazy and way too much work to re-deploy or
even run updates on. I also want to tweak the db config a bit in the
hopes that we
been testing them locally
Thanks,
Tim Flink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
I've not been talking about this a whole lot but I've been working on a
slightly different take on test automation as of late. The system as a
whole is very rough and nowhere near complete but I think it does
demonstrate several of the ideas I'm interested in from a high level.
I wrote several
On Wed, 8 May 2013 12:27:27 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
As usual, this is rather last minute but I'm in the process of
bringing autoqa and autoqa-stg down for updates.
I don't think there will be any problems, will send out an all-clear
when I'm done.
Everything is back up
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/25/
---
(Updated May 2, 2013, 4:56 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/25/#review31
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me
- Tim Flink
On April 24, 2013
It's been a while since the qa-devel list was created and I'm planning
to start the process of decomissioning autoqa-devel.
I'm going to start looking for references to autoqa-devel on the
various Fedora wikis and change the references to qa-devel.
At the moment, I'm planning to put autoqa-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/24/#review29
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me, please merge into develop
- Tim
the logger as a bodhi
interface due to the order of args - either switch to named args here or change
the order of args in the UpdateSync __init__ and make sure that it doesn't
break anything
- Tim Flink
On April 3, 2013, 11:53 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 05:05:01 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
One more idea, the top left logo should be clickable and should
redirect to the Home tab. It's customary for most projects.
Filed as https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/369
Also it would be nice to
301 - 364 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
