On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 08:19:43PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2023/07/02 19:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 06:46:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF so the PF should
> > > end the linked list formed with the
On 2023/07/02 19:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 06:46:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF so the PF should
end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
This also changes the value of the field for VF; it
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 06:46:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF so the PF should
> end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
>
> This also changes the value of the field for VF; it seems to imply the
> value has some meaning
The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF so the PF should
end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
This also changes the value of the field for VF; it seems to imply the
value has some meaning if it differs from one of the PF, but it doesn't.
Fixes: 2503461691
