On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 08:20:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
If we wish to make differential backups a feature that's easy to access,
it might be pertinent to rename the dirty-bitmap mode to incremental
to make it clear what /type/ of backup the dirty-bitmap is helping us
perform.
This is an
On 06/04/2015 06:20 PM, John Snow wrote:
If we wish to make differential backups a feature that's easy to access,
it might be pertinent to rename the dirty-bitmap mode to incremental
to make it clear what /type/ of backup the dirty-bitmap is helping us
perform.
This is an API breaking
If we wish to make differential backups a feature that's easy to access,
it might be pertinent to rename the dirty-bitmap mode to incremental
to make it clear what /type/ of backup the dirty-bitmap is helping us
perform.
This is an API breaking change, but 2.4 has not yet gone live,
so we have
