Hi Philippe,
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The first 3 patches are trivial leak fixes, the last
> one is a RFC since I have no clue about this code.
>
> Johannes, you wrote this 18 years ago, do you still
> remember? =)
I do remember writing them, but I remember almost not
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When you have a design to solve the problem (and I believe it might be
> better to start that from scratch rather than extending vvfat as it
> would end up being a rewrite anyway), we can discuss that design.
I fully agree on all three accounts.
Hi Pintu,
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> I already did some work for scanning only top level directory in vvfat.
> Using the following logic in read_directory()
>
> if(parent_index >= 0 & (!dot & !dotdot))
> {
>free(buffer);
>break;
> }
Sorry, this is way too deep in
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 07:36 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/09/2010 05:01 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> > > > Documenting QEMU's hardware model may b
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 05:01 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> > Documenting QEMU's hardware model may be also a good idea for GSoC2010,
> > as most complains about contributing QEMU are precisely that, having to
> > study the whole code to know how to make anyth
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:31:23 +0100 (CET)
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> > > Google has this wonderful program called Summer of Code, in which open
> >
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Google has this wonderful program called Summer of Code, in which open
> source projects like ours, suggest possible projects and provide mentors
> to help selected students to do them.
>
> It's a great opportunity for students to get in touch
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > I'm not getting into this discussion and is not going to happen, you
> > have all the necessary information on spiec-space.org in order to take
> > intelligent decision. The QEMU community can choose to reject Spice if
> > it decide to do so.
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> Am 14.03.2008 um 00:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> >On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Vernam wrote:
> >
> > >[gcc4] Not supported? Okay, fine. But don't tell me it can't work.
> > >The fact of t
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Vernam wrote:
> [gcc4] Not supported? Okay, fine. But don't tell me it can't work.
> The fact of the matter is that I use it daily.
>
> Make configure fail horribly? Well, that seems a bit counter-productive,
> don't you think?
If you would only have research
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Ben Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
> >
> > Which part of "gcc 4.x is not supported" didn't you understand?
>
> Apparently, we should make configure fail horribly if gcc4
to block-qcow.c in release
> 1.8; and resulting in a broken qcow image based in an inexistent "fat:"
> base when "fat:rw" was requested.
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
Dscho
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Here is a revamped patch:
Thanks, and thanks for the explanations, too.
Ciao,
Dscho
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The patch below fixes SDL mouse events processing:
> - GetRelativeMouseState always returns the last position, so when the
> polling loop gets several mouse events in one go, we would send
> useless 'no move' events.
> - So as to make sure we d
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin, le Wed 27 Feb 2008 15:35:01 +, a écrit :
> > > Index: cocoa.m
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/cocoa.m,v
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Index: cocoa.m
> ===
> RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/cocoa.m,v
> retrieving revision 1.15
> diff -u -p -r1.15 cocoa.m
> --- cocoa.m 22 Jan 2008 23:25:15 - 1.15
> +++ cocoa.m
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> I do:
> wget
> http://qemu-forum.ipi.fi/qemu-snapshots/qemu-snapshot-2008-02-27_05.tar.bz2
> tar -xjf qemu-snapshot-2008-02-27_05.tar.bz2
> ./configure
> sudo make
>
> And then I get that error.
Apparently whoever creates those snapshots has incomp
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Zeno Davatz wrote:
>
> > I am not a developer but I just tested the latest
> > qemu-snapshot-2008-02-27_05 on my Gentoo Maschine and I get the
> > following error after doing "./configure" and and "sudo make":
> >
> > gcc-3.3.6 -I. -I..
> > -I/hom
Hi,
I still have problems (Pentium M, gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease)
(SUSE Linux)):
make -C i386-linux-user all
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gitte/qemu/i386-linux-user'
gcc -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-reorder-blocks -fno-gcse
-fno-tree-ch -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I asked on the SDL mailing list, and they answered that qemu should
> indeed not use SDL_GetRelativeMouseState(), since that only provides the
> latest mouse position, not the position at the time of the event.
AFAIR this is done so that your g
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote:
> the attached patch fixes some glitches when switching to fullscreen mode
> using ctrl+alt+f or when booting using -full-screen.
Wow. This patch is messy, if I may say so. There must be a more elegant
way to do this, especially given the f
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ralf Baerwaldt wrote:
> I downloaded http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-0.9.1-i386.tar.gz
> and I'm using an AMD Opteron.
>
> Is this version the correct one for my system ?
>
> # file /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64
> /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64: ELF 32-b
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] What does code_copy_enabled
> do?"):
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > At the very least we need one drcs branch containing only changes
> > &
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * In the meantime, or if upstream decide not to, what is the best way
>for non-upstream contributors to collaborate with each other ?
>
> [...]
>
> What should those of us who want to collaborate using a drcs (so that we
> can share our work-in
Hi,
I did not really want to continue this discussion, but then, I really
cannot let certain statements slip by. *sigh*
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > Any news on the possible cvs->svn migration?
> >
> > To be perfectly honest, IMO there is little point moving an existing
> > pro
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rob Landley wrote:
> I've been using git://git.kernel.dk/data/git/qemu.git although I
> personally prefer mercurial. (It's easier to learn and to use, you get
> the web viewer for free, etc.)
I really grow tired of people perpetuating how "easy" Mercurial is,
without
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> The advantage of using SVN is that most drcs play along with it quite
> decently. Something that doesn't happen with CVS.
So you're saying in order to use a DVCS you would need to switch to a
CVCS?
Puzzled,
Dscho
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes ("Re: Git/SVN/CVS? was Re: [Qemu-devel] What does
> code_copy_enabled do?"):
> > Just clone git://repo.or.cz/qemu.git, then.
>
> Rob Landley writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] What does code_co
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Right now I can't use qemu because a bug introduced in the last months
> and with git-bisect I probably would be able to fix it myself.
Just clone git://repo.or.cz/qemu.git, then.
Hth,
Dscho
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 2/9/08, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And I'm not a fan of _forcing_ people to switch to another SCM. You
> > can use git (and even cvsimport yourself, should the public git
> > mirrors l
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 2/8/08, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 February 2008 21:52:33 Paul Brook wrote:
> > > On Friday 08 February 2008, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > Grepping through the source code, I can find 3 places where this global
> > > > va
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, C.W. Betts wrote:
> Index: configure
> ===
> RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/configure,v
> retrieving revision 1.187
> diff -u -r1.187 configure
> --- configure 3 Feb 2008 19:20:13 - 1.187
> +++ configure 8 F
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, C.W. Betts wrote:
> This is a better patch to make qemu on Windows show info when you go
> into properties.
It is _still_ a hassle to review your patch, since you did not inline it
again.
So I will comment without quoting any of your patch, which will leave
others gue
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, C.W. Betts wrote:
> This patch will make an .rc file that will put the version info as well
> as a brief discription of the app for Windows.
It would have been easier to comment on the patch if you would have
inlined it.
>diff -u -r1.187 configure
>--- configure 3 Fe
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony Liguori writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] avoid name clashes due to
> LIST_* macros"):
> > Ian Jackson wrote:
> >
> > > qemu's audio subdirectory contains a copy of BSD's sys-queue.h,
> > > which defines a bunch of LIST_ macros. This makes i
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I would really like to use OpenGL on non-Apple platforms. OpenGL gives
> much better scaling than SDL. Typically, and OpenGL app has very little
> platform specific code. It would be nice if we could use similar code
> here.
But SDL runs on
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Booting that resulted in a virtual machine that, as I had hoped, used
> 10.0.3.15 and could therefore successfully talk to my 10.0.2.x IPs on
> the LAN. I've attached a 'cvs diff' against HEAD that results from the
> above command.
And the next
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Christian Laursen wrote:
> Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>>From my minimal understanding of what he is saying, it seems he would
> > prefer there to be a BOCHS graphics adapter, which would then pass the
> > OpenGL commands from Windows to Linux OpenGL. A
e Linux setups need linux/compiler.h; if it exists, include it
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
configure |3 +++
usb-linux.c |3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index bcb958d..330020d 100755
--- a/conf
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Mike Kronenberg wrote:
> Offtoppic about updated regions in Windows: While testing with
> Quartzdebug, I realized, that qemu is updating always the whole
> screenwidth even if only the mouse is moved... is this a qemu problem,
> or is this the default windows behaviour
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> But when the existing code says
>
> }
> #ifndef _WIN32
> if (strstart(display, "unix:", &p)) {
> addr = (struct sockaddr *)&uaddr;
> addrlen = sizeof(uaddr);
> etc.
>
> then changing it to something like
>
> #if !(d
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> this patch allows to mount qemu disk images on the host.
This patch has an awful lot of "#ifdef __linux__" in it. But I imagine
that you could use it on a non-linux host, too, for example with yet
another qemu instance running Linux... Or coLi
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> >
> > > CVSROOT: /sources/qemu
> > > Module name: qemu
> > > Changes by: Fabrice Bellard
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, C.W. Betts wrote:
> I was thinking, maybe qemu could use threads for at least every
> processor it emulates (on emulated smp computers) and, at the most,
> every single device emulated. This would help users who have multiple
> cores, but it might impact performance o
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, C.W. Betts wrote:
> Builds fine on MinGW gcc 3.4.5
Maybe it was a combination of changes? I don't remember.
Just to make sure, I will recompile and test again, but that will have to
wait until after work.
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: do other posters also get that SMTP error w
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> CVSROOT: /sources/qemu
> Module name: qemu
> Changes by: Fabrice Bellard08/01/21 15:07:18
>
> Modified files:
> . : softmmu_header.h
>
> Log message:
> fixed register constraint
>
> CVSWeb URLs:
> http:
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 21.01.2008 um 12:18 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> > The miniops right now are implemented as plain C commands. If the
> > "good" gcc guys would not have insisted on not having an option to
> > force t
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> If I may jump into the pool...
>
> > I plan to work around the MinGW issue by guarding the offending part
> > by "#ifdef GCC...", even if I have been told that it works only by
> > chance (but it works, whereas any other option I tried does not
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Even Rouault wrote:
> After quite a lot of CVS bisection, [...]
Not wanting to advertise git, but to help other people needing to bisect
efficiently: here is a recipe how to do this with git.
1. get git (obviously)
2. $ git clone git://repo.or.cz/qemu.git/
(it is a
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.01.2008 um 23:38 schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki:
>
> > Ignoring the fact that the original poster wrote in all caps and can't
> > contribute much to qemu development, what is being done or who can
> > give directions on what would have to b
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> having people type all caps e-mails contributes nothing.
I disagree: it makes it easier to spot whom to ignore. Unless you know
that person, of course, and respect her, too.
Ciao,
Dscho
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 19.01.2008 um 12:16 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
> >
> > > Am 18.01.2008 um 20:28 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > >
> > > > Even if anot
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 18.01.2008 um 20:28 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> > Even if another system starts working, if you break existing users,
> > you did something wrong. And if you don't care, and don't mind giving
> > exis
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 18.01.2008 um 19:10 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
> > But that broke a previously working system, and that's why I agree
> > with Fabrice.
>
> At the same time it made a more modern system work. Refusing
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>
> > Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > This patch is mostly a cleanup of Michael Matz's patch with the
> > > ideas that came last time included.
> >
> > I must say I don't like such patches because
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > Well, I can tell you why, but it doesn't help you: the 3.4.2
> > > compiler has different deficiencies in reload than the 4.x line of
> > > compilers.
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Moreover, I will commit in the next few days a new code generator in
> QEMU which will utimately solve the compilation problems. In its current
> form it still relies on "dyngen" so that legacy micro operations still
> work, but in the end dyng
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > But I'm not talking about the clobber list at all. I reacted to the
> > > first mail forwarded to me, which was a question specifically about
> > > the
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> But I'm not talking about the clobber list at all. I reacted to the
> first mail forwarded to me, which was a question specifically about the
> hunk adding the "q" constraint, whose purpose I explained. Are you now
> also asking about the change
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > > > asm (" ... movzbl %b1, %%edx\n ... " : : "r" (blubb), "r" (bla) );
> > > >
> > > > Okay, but this o
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:14 AM, consul wrote:
>
> > It broke mingw build with gcc-3.4.2
>
> Does it work if you change the lines I'll comment on below?
Yes, if I force the pushing and popping of ecx, it compiles
(unfortunately, I could not test th
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > > >+#if DATA_SIZE == 1 || DATA_SIZE == 2
> > > > >+ "q" (v),
> > > > >+#else
> > > > >
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> [answering to a forwarded mail, hence breaking thread, sorry]
> [and keep me CCed :) ]
Sorry, I never break Cc: list, but always reply-to-all.
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> > >On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Joha
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Mike Kronenberg wrote:
> I tried it quick and dirty with Alex osx-patch (without exec-all.h part)
> on a x86_64. everything except ppc-softmmu
> (/tmp/qemu/target-ppc/exec.h:135:2: error: #endif without #if) compiled
> fine. I'm going to make some more test and try to
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, consul wrote:
>
> > It broke mingw build with gcc-3.4.2
>
> Now that's funny, since the last incarnation Alexander should have
> _exactly_ the same code as before for gcc < 4. Are you
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, consul wrote:
> It broke mingw build with gcc-3.4.2
Now that's funny, since the last incarnation Alexander should have
_exactly_ the same code as before for gcc < 4. Are you sure that you do
not have applied the patch that exchanges at least one "#ifdef HOST_I386"
fo
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> Friday 18 January 2008 00:59:36 tarihinde Johannes Schindelin şunları
> yazmıştı:
> > > Thursday 17 January 2008 19:00:11 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
> >
> > ??
>
> Turkish for "@date you wrote this."
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> Thursday 17 January 2008 19:00:11 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
??
> Might be a GCC 4.3 thing :-/
I guess so. Maybe I will find some time next week to compile gcc 4.3 and
test with it...
Ciao,
Dscho
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> : > On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > > According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Is GPLv3 unwanted for QEMU source code? If yes: why?
The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
not even think that an email would suffice).
Besi
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> Thanks but ppc target doesn't work here with gcc 4.3 trunk , i686-linux :
>
> gcc -mtune=native -march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
> -Wstrict-overflow -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -I.
> -I..
> -I/var/pisi/qemu
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> It fixed it for me, but only after a "make distclean && ./configure &&
>
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jens Arm wrote:
> >>>
> &g
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> It fixed it for me, but only after a "make distclean && ./configure &&
> make". Apparently there are still some dependencies which are not
> right.
Spoke too soon... It introduces an extra #endif in ta
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
> > Jens Arm wrote:
> >
> >> With this I can compile, but qemu segfaults now when trying to start a ros
> >> image:
> >>
> >> Starting program: /home/tux/QEMU/qemu -m 192 ros/ros
> >> [Thread debugging using libthread_db e
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Is check_ops.sh not enough for debugging micro-ops?
> > >
> > Basically it should be. PowerPC branching can be (regex) b..rl. Honestly
> > I did not know about this script though and as it was not in the
> > make
Hi,
I get an error with sh4-linux-user and sh4eb-linux-user:
../dyngen -o op.h op.o
dyngen: ret or jmp expected at the end of op_cmp_str_T0_T1
There is a "RETURN();" statement at the end of
target-sh4/op.c:op_cmp_str_T0_T1() though, so I am puzzled...
It also says "target-ppc/exec.h:44:26: err
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
> > This patch is mostly a cleanup of Michael Matz's patch with the ideas
> > that came last time included.
>
> I didn't include one file in the previous patch, sorry. This patch also
> includes Johannes' catch to use #ifdefs
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >> This patch is mostly a cleanup of Michael Matz's patch with the ideas
> >> that came l
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> This patch is mostly a cleanup of Michael Matz's patch with the ideas
> that came last time included.
Maybe the patch subject could be "prepare i386 host for gcc4, step 1)?
> Index: qemu/softmmu_header.h
> ===
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >> I believe the 5% performance hit that goes with them is no real
> >> problem, as most people should be using x86_64 nowadays anyway.
> >
> > *Boggle*! x86_64 is only a few years old, and c
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I haven't looked that deeply myself, but your explanations do not give
>> me a cozy feeling about your patch.
>
> I see your point, and I would love
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
> diff --git a/qemu/vl.c b/qemu/vl.c
> index 30c9537..8d67314 100644
> --- a/qemu/vl.c
> +++ b/qemu/vl.c
> @@ -4902,13 +4902,6 @@ static void dumb_resize(DisplayState *ds, int w, int h)
> {
> }
>
> -static void dumb_refresh(DisplayState *ds)
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
> [an attached patch]
Since you attached the patch, I will not quote the part that I am
commenting on.
By your change to dumb_refresh() you are affecting definitely more than
just VNC. I have doubts that this is intended, or good.
Ciao,
Dsc
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > AFAICT 727da25d(Fix broken absoluteness check for cabs.d.*) is not
> > necessary, as it is for the MIPS target, which is not supposed to work
> > right now. But I'm sure if I'm w
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Perhaps the best solution is to put "file=" option at the end of
> aliases, '\0' is marking the end of filename (it is likely the idea of
> andrzej about special characters).
Oh, why not just make it a requirement that file= comes last, always?
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 13:27 +0000, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> [...]
> > Besides, it would not be _that_ complicated:
>
> This patch doesn't manage the case where we have comma in filename:
>
> qem
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
> As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
> branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
>
> 1. Only fixes will be applied.
> 2. Patches will be applied only after they are applied on qemu head.
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote:
> Hey where is the QEMU IRC channel? I wouldn't mind being a "fly on the
> wall" in there.
#qemu on irc.freenode.net
Hth,
Dscho
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 11:40 +0100, andrzej zaborowski a écrit :
> >
> > > On 09/01/2008, Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 10:31 +0100, Laurent Vivier a é
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 13:27 +0000, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >
> > > Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 12:27 +, Johannes Schindelin a
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 12:27 +0000, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
>
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >
> > > but "-hda" is an alias for "-drive file="%s",index=%d,me
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> but "-hda" is an alias for "-drive file="%s",index=%d,media=disk".
It appears to me as if "-hda" is implemented suboptimally, then. In
particular, drive_add() should be able to get a separate "file" parameter,
which can be overridden by the "fmt
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Armin wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > All other settings are command line switches and/or monitor settings,
> > and there is no good reason why switches and jumpers should not be
> > handled that way.
>
> Do you mean somethi
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Armin wrote:
> This may be one way to simulate switch or jumper settings one may change
> on a board before booting. It uses a simple text file for input. The
> file name is pointed to by -config on the command line.
>
> example:
> config file:
> [switches]
> 7:on
> [
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > However, I have no problem maintaining my own fork. Much like I will
> > do with VNC again, since I recently had to use QEmu via VNC and the
> > artefacts are just horrible.
>
&
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here goes v0.2 for my patch :
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
> > Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
> > Changes
> > - now the option is a separate command line switch:
> > -net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
> >
>
> Is it really necessary/useful to specify this on the
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Antti P Miettinen wrote:
>
> > Rick Vernam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > any comments on the current status of moving beyond dependency on
> > > GCC 3.3.6?
> >
> > So
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Antti P Miettinen wrote:
> Rick Vernam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > any comments on the current status of moving beyond dependency on GCC
> > 3.3.6?
>
> Sorry for a vague ignorant question, but would the gcc-4 issues be
> affected in any way if the ops were inside a
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo