On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:11:01PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> The switch case of writing PCI 1 IO base address had an extra break
> statement that made part of the code unreachable. This did not cause a
> problem as guests ususally leave this register at its default value.
>
> Reported-by:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/12/21 3:11 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
The switch case of writing PCI 1 IO base address had an extra break
statement that made part of the code unreachable. This did not cause a
problem as guests ususally leave this register at its default
On 7/12/21 3:11 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> The switch case of writing PCI 1 IO base address had an extra break
> statement that made part of the code unreachable. This did not cause a
> problem as guests ususally leave this register at its default value.
>
> Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1458135)
The switch case of writing PCI 1 IO base address had an extra break
statement that made part of the code unreachable. This did not cause a
problem as guests ususally leave this register at its default value.
Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1458135)
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---