On Thu May 9, 2024 at 9:33 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue May 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >> On Tue, 7 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >>> What do you think about adding mmu-book3e.c instead?
> >>
> >> I have
On Wed, 8 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Tue May 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
What do you think about adding mmu-book3e.c instead?
I have considered that but found that some functions have to be in the
same file and declared
On Tue May 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > What do you think about adding mmu-book3e.c instead?
>
> I have considered that but found that some functions have to be in the
> same file and declared static for the compiler to inline
On Tue, 7 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
What do you think about adding mmu-book3e.c instead?
Now I remember that besides possible performance loss because of loss of
automatic inline if not all functions are static the other reason was that
these functions use mmu_ctx_t that I don't want
On Tue, 7 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
What do you think about adding mmu-book3e.c instead?
I have considered that but found that some functions have to be in the
same file and declared static for the compiler to inline them otherwise I
get worse performance. Maybe after these
What do you think about adding mmu-book3e.c instead?
Thanks,
Nick
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 9:43 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
> ---
> target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 300
> 1 file changed, 150 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
>
>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 300
1 file changed, 150 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
index b76611da80..204b8af455 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
+++
