On 9/23/19 1:26 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> +void finalize_target_page_bits(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY
>> +if (target_page_bits == 0) {
>> +target_page_bits = TARGET_PAGE_BITS_MIN;
>> +}
>> +target_page_bits_decided = true;
>> +#endif
>> +}
> I wonder if
On 22.09.19 05:54, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The next patch will play a trick with "const" that will
> confuse the compiler about the uses of target_page_bits
> within exec.c. Moving everything to a new file prevents
> this confusion.
>
> No functional change so far.
>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe
The next patch will play a trick with "const" that will
confuse the compiler about the uses of target_page_bits
within exec.c. Moving everything to a new file prevents
this confusion.
No functional change so far.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by:
