On 6/28/22 20:28, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 28/06/2022 um 17:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/28/22 18:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 6/28/22 16:04, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Ok so far I did the following:
- duplicated each public function as stat
Am 28/06/2022 um 17:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 6/28/22 18:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> On 6/28/22 16:04, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> Ok so far I did the following:
>
> - duplicated each public function as static {function}_locked()
They s
On 6/28/22 18:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 6/28/22 16:04, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Ok so far I did the following:
- duplicated each public function as static {function}_locked()
They shouldn't be duplicates: function without _locked suffix should
take the mutex.
By "dup
On 6/28/22 16:04, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Ok so far I did the following:
- duplicated each public function as static {function}_locked()
They shouldn't be duplicates: function without _locked suffix should
take the mutex.
By "duplicate" I mean same function name, with just _locked su
Am 28/06/2022 um 12:47 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 6/28/22 10:40, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
>>> On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir
On 6/28/22 10:40, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
With the*no
Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
>>> On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
With the*nop* job_lock/unlock placed, rename the
Am 24/06/2022 um 17:28 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 6/24/22 16:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Yes, I think Vladimir is having the same difficulties with reading the
>> series as I had. And I believe his suggestion would make the
>> intermediate states less impossible to review. The question is how much
On 6/24/22 16:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Yes, I think Vladimir is having the same difficulties with reading the
series as I had. And I believe his suggestion would make the
intermediate states less impossible to review. The question is how much
work it would be and whether you're willing to do this. A
Am 23.06.2022 um 13:19 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
>
>
> Am 23/06/2022 um 13:10 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> > On 6/23/22 12:08, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> >>> On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuel
On 6/23/22 14:19, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 23/06/2022 um 13:10 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/23/22 12:08, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 21/06/202
Am 23/06/2022 um 13:10 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 6/23/22 12:08, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
>>> On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir
On 6/23/22 12:08, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
With the*no
Am 22/06/2022 um 20:38 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
>>> On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
With the*nop* job_lock/unlock placed, rename the
On 6/22/22 17:26, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
With the*nop* job_lock/unlock placed, rename the static
functions that are always under job_mutex, adding "_locked" suffix.
Li
Am 21/06/2022 um 19:26 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> With the*nop* job_lock/unlock placed, rename the static
>> functions that are always under job_mutex, adding "_locked" suffix.
>>
>> List of functions that get this suffix:
>> j
On 6/16/22 16:18, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
With the*nop* job_lock/unlock placed, rename the static
functions that are always under job_mutex, adding "_locked" suffix.
List of functions that get this suffix:
job_txn_refjob_txn_del_job
job_txn_apply job_state
With the *nop* job_lock/unlock placed, rename the static
functions that are always under job_mutex, adding "_locked" suffix.
List of functions that get this suffix:
job_txn_refjob_txn_del_job
job_txn_apply job_state_transition
job_should_pause job_event_cance
18 matches
Mail list logo
