On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:18:04AM -0700, Brandon Carpenter wrote:
> I haven't seen this patch hit master yet and am about to submit a patch set
> that is dependent on this one because it triggers the bug fixed by this
> patch, causing a segmentation fault. Is it preferred that I include this
> pat
I haven't seen this patch hit master yet and am about to submit a patch
set that is dependent on this one because it triggers the bug fixed by
this patch, causing a segmentation fault. Is it preferred that I
include this patch in that series with the Reviewed-by: tags or to just
reference this
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:15:44AM -0700, Brandon Carpenter wrote:
> Also set saved handle to zero when removing without adding a new watch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Carpenter
> ---
> ui/vnc-auth-vencrypt.c | 3 +++
> ui/vnc-ws.c| 6 ++
> ui/vnc.c | 4
> 3 fi
On 24/07/2017 20:15, Brandon Carpenter wrote:
> Also set saved handle to zero when removing without adding a new watch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Carpenter
> ---
> ui/vnc-auth-vencrypt.c | 3 +++
> ui/vnc-ws.c| 6 ++
> ui/vnc.c | 4
> 3 files changed, 13 inser
Also set saved handle to zero when removing without adding a new watch.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Carpenter
---
ui/vnc-auth-vencrypt.c | 3 +++
ui/vnc-ws.c| 6 ++
ui/vnc.c | 4
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ui/vnc-auth-vencrypt.c b/ui/vnc-auth-ve
