On 14/08/2017 21:03, Matt Parker wrote:
>>> static const MemoryRegionOps rtl8139_mmio_ops = {
>> I think you don't even need to declare a separate MemoryRegionOps, and
>> can just recycle rtl8139_io_ops?
> Looking at the memory region, it's only 0x100 bytes in size,
> so addr & 0xFF would not be n
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:40:27AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 23:33, Matt Parker wrote:
> > This updates the current MemoryRegionOps for the bar 1 memory region
> > from using the old_mmio accessors to the .read and .write accessors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Parker
> > ---
> >
On 12/08/2017 23:33, Matt Parker wrote:
> This updates the current MemoryRegionOps for the bar 1 memory region
> from using the old_mmio accessors to the .read and .write accessors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Parker
> ---
> hw/net/rtl8139.c | 60
> +++---
On 2017年08月13日 05:34, Matt Parker wrote:
This updates the current MemoryRegionOps for the bar 1 memory region
from using the old_mmio accessors to the .read and .write accessors.
Signed-off-by: Matt Parker
---
hw/net/rtl8139.c | 60 +++-
This updates the current MemoryRegionOps for the bar 1 memory region
from using the old_mmio accessors to the .read and .write accessors.
Signed-off-by: Matt Parker
---
hw/net/rtl8139.c | 60 +++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 44 deletions(
This updates the current MemoryRegionOps for the bar 1 memory region
from using the old_mmio accessors to the .read and .write accessors.
Signed-off-by: Matt Parker
---
hw/net/rtl8139.c | 60 +++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 44 deletions(
