On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:49:40AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:30:28AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > - Maintainers can deprecate stuffs
> > > > - Orphan code can become Supported
> > > > - Once scheduled for removal, there is no way back
> > > >
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:30:28AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > - Maintainers can deprecate stuffs
> > > - Orphan code can become Supported
> > > - Once scheduled for removal, there is no way back
> > > - 'Unknown' seems pretty similar to 'Orphan'.
> >
> > I'm still worried that
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 03:06:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:04:16PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/30/2018 09:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > Hi Gerd,
> > >
> > > On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > >> Indicates support state for
Hi,
> > - Maintainers can deprecate stuffs
> > - Orphan code can become Supported
> > - Once scheduled for removal, there is no way back
> > - 'Unknown' seems pretty similar to 'Orphan'.
>
> I'm still worried that the supported/unsupported distinction may
> cause unnecessary hassle for every
On 10/31/2018 02:58 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:37:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/31/2018 02:06 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:04:16PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
On 10/30/2018 09:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:37:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2018 02:06 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:04:16PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/30/2018 09:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> Hi Gerd,
> >>>
> >>> On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd
On 10/31/2018 02:06 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:04:16PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/30/2018 09:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi Gerd,
>>>
>>> On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:04:16PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/2018 09:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Gerd,
> >
> > On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
> >
> > "something"
> >
> >> in
On 10/30/2018 09:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
>
> "something"
>
>> in qemu. Modeled roughly after the "S:" states we have in MAINTANERS.
>>
>>
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 20:15:45 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 06:37:42PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, we have this 'state machine':
> >
> >SupportedUnsupported Deprecated
> >
> > (someone to talk) (nobody
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 06:37:42PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 30/10/18 16:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:13:45 +0100
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >
> > > On 30/10/18 15:00, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0100, Philippe
On 30/10/18 16:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:13:45 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 30/10/18 15:00, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
+##
+# @SupportState:
+#
+# Indicate Support level of qemu devices,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:13:45 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 30/10/18 15:00, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> +##
> >>> +# @SupportState:
> >>> +#
> >>> +# Indicate Support level of qemu devices, backends,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:13:45PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
> in qemu. Modeled roughly after the "S:" states we have in MAINTANERS.
>
Personally, I would prefer to start with a very simple data model
(e.g. a
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:13:45PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
> in qemu. Modeled roughly after the "S:" states we have in MAINTANERS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
[...]
> +typedef struct QemuSupportState {
> +
On 30/10/18 15:00, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Gerd,
On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
"something"
Oops, I'll fix.
+##
+# @SupportState:
+#
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
>
> "something"
Oops, I'll fix.
> > +##
> > +# @SupportState:
> > +#
> > +# Indicate
Hi Gerd,
On 30/10/18 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
"something"
in qemu. Modeled roughly after the "S:" states we have in MAINTANERS.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
include/qemu/support-state.h | 17
Indicates support state for somerhing (device, backend, subsystem, ...)
in qemu. Modeled roughly after the "S:" states we have in MAINTANERS.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
include/qemu/support-state.h | 17 +
util/support-state.c | 23 +++
19 matches
Mail list logo
