On 06/11/2012 08:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Harsh Bora wrote:
On 06/07/2012 08:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
@@ -75,16 +96,22 @@ static char *trace_file_name = NULL;
*
* Returns false if t
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Harsh Bora wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 08:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
>> wrote:
>>> @@ -75,16 +96,22 @@ static char *trace_file_name = NULL;
>>> *
>>> * Returns false if the record is not valid.
>>> */
>>
On 06/07/2012 08:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
A newer tracelog format which gets rid of fixed size trace records and
therefore allows to trace multiple arguments as well as strings in trace
events.
Sample trace:
v9fs_version 0.000 t
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
> A newer tracelog format which gets rid of fixed size trace records and
> therefore allows to trace multiple arguments as well as strings in trace
> events.
>
> Sample trace:
> v9fs_version 0.000 tag=0x id=0x64 msize=0x2000 version=9
A newer tracelog format which gets rid of fixed size trace records and
therefore allows to trace multiple arguments as well as strings in trace
events.
Sample trace:
v9fs_version 0.000 tag=0x id=0x64 msize=0x2000 version=9P2000.L
v9fs_version_return 6.705 tag=0x id=0x64 msize=0x2000 versio
