On 07/08/2016 04:01 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.07.2016 um 00:45 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 07/07/2016 06:11 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
>>> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
>>> block-stream
Am 08.07.2016 um 00:45 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 07/07/2016 06:11 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> > external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> > block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the res
On 07/07/2016 06:11 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
> we're operating at a root node.
>
> In cas
In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
we're operating at a root node.
In case of an invalid device name, the command returns the G
