Il 17/04/2014 15:44, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
I'm fine with this.
And I'm not against a runtime switch to get rid of per-target build of virtio.
I am merely asking for separatable patchsets, e.g. structured like this:
1. implement bi-endian support with no data path overhead for fixed endi
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:29:13PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:00:26 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:54:12AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:32:07 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 16,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:00:26 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:54:12AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:32:07 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > On 16 April 2014 17
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:42:22 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 April 2014 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > so it looks like virtio is currently compiled per-target.
> > So why isn't it reasonable to keep it per-target for
> > purpose of this enhancement?
> > What am I missing?
>
> "virtio"
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:54:12AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:32:07 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On 16 April 2014 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > so it looks like virtio is currently
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:32:07 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 16 April 2014 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > so it looks like virtio is currently compiled per-target.
> > > So why isn't it reasonable to keep it per-ta
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 April 2014 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > so it looks like virtio is currently compiled per-target.
> > So why isn't it reasonable to keep it per-target for
> > purpose of this enhancement?
> > What am I missing?
>
> "vi
On 16 April 2014 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> so it looks like virtio is currently compiled per-target.
> So why isn't it reasonable to keep it per-target for
> purpose of this enhancement?
> What am I missing?
"virtio" is more than one C file. Currently per-target:
hw/virtio/virtio.c
hw/vi
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:22:56PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:35:03 +0200
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> > On 04/15/2014 10:40 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:08:23 +0200
> > > Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 14.04.14 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
On 15 April 2014 14:22, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:35:03 +0200
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>> That would defeat the purpose - the reason to have the helper inlined is
>> to remove the conditional branch for x86.
>>
>
> Sure but on the other hand, Peter does not like the idea of moving
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:35:03 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 10:40 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:08:23 +0200
> > Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >> On 14.04.14 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
On 04/15/2014 10:40 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:08:23 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +020
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:08:23 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:40:04 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
On 14.04.14 15:12, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:53:03 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:50, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:22:36 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:53:03 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:50, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:22:36 +0200
> > Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >> On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>> From: Rusty Russell
> >>>
> >>> virtio data structures are defined as "target endi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 03:08:23PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:46:34 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >>On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin w
On 14.04.14 14:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:49:31PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29
On 04/14/2014 02:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 14.04.14
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:49:31PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:50, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:22:36 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specif
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:22:36 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > From: Rusty Russell
> >
> > virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
> > that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
> > The OASIS vir
On 14.04.14 14:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This will have to be measure
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:40:04PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:38:14PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 14:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data stru
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:16:03 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > From: Rusty Russell
> >
> > virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
> > that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
> > The OASIS vir
On 14.04.14 14:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 14:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could we try to poison any non-virtio, non-endian-specific memory
accessors
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>>From: Rusty Russell
> >>>
> >>>virtio data structures are defined as "ta
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 14:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>>From: Rusty Russell
> >>>
> >>>virtio data structures are defined as "ta
On 14.04.14 14:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's p
On 14.04.14 14:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's p
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >From: Rusty Russell
> >
> >virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
> >that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
> >The OASIS vi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >From: Rusty Russell
> >
> >virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
> >that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
> >The OASIS vi
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
The OASIS virtio 1.0 spec will fix this, by making it all little endian.
We introduce memory
On 14.04.14 13:58, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
The OASIS virtio 1.0 spec will fix this, by making it all little endian.
We introduce memory
From: Rusty Russell
virtio data structures are defined as "target endian", which assumes
that's a fixed value. In fact, that actually means it's platform-specific.
The OASIS virtio 1.0 spec will fix this, by making it all little endian.
We introduce memory accessors to be used accross the virti
40 matches
Mail list logo
