Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 18.10.2016 um 15:14 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: >>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 18.10.2016 um 15:14 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> > Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On 10/18/2016 08:33 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> I have successfully converted NFS block driver to use this set of >> runtime opts which I think is the required condition to add >> blockdev-add compatibility later. Also, since I do not have 'port' as >> a runtime option, I can directly add

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

Am 18.10.2016 um 15:14 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: > >> > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: >> > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: > > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > >>> > >>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya: >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> >>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: >>> One more relatively easy question

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya: On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: > One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an > option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several > runtime_opts? The reason I ask this because the uri syntax for NFS in > QEMU looks like this: > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: > >> One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an >> option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several >> runtime_opts? The reason I ask this

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:39:30AM +0530, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was working on trying to add blockdev-add compatibility for the nfs >> block driver but before that runtime options need to be

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:39:30AM +0530, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: > Hi all, > > I was working on trying to add blockdev-add compatibility for the nfs > block driver but before that runtime options need to be separated into > various options rather than just a simple "filename" option. > > I have