Le Monday 04 Nov 2013 à 19:33:21 (+0800), Fam Zheng a écrit :
On 11/04/2013 07:06 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.11.2013 um 10:48 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by id, or (for backward
compatibility) to the root BDS by device. When the code sees
device, it'll look up the BB, then
On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by id, or (for backward
compatibility) to the root BDS by device. When the
Am 04.11.2013 um 10:48 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by id, or (for backward
Am 01.11.2013 um 16:12 hat Luiz Capitulino geschrieben:
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:59:20 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus
On 11/04/2013 07:06 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.11.2013 um 10:48 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:13:59 +0100
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 um 16:12 hat Luiz Capitulino geschrieben:
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:59:20 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by id, or (for backward
compatibility) to the root BDS by
On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by id, or (for
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:59:20 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another
[Note cc: Eric Luiz, because this also relates to QMP]
Benoît Canet benoit.ca...@irqsave.net writes:
Hi list,
After a discussion on irc we have two potential solution in order to introduce
a new bs-node_name member in order to be able to manipulate the graph from
the
monitors.
The
On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say id. Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by id, or (for backward
compatibility) to the root BDS by device. When the code sees
device, it'll look up the BB, then fetch its root
Hi list,
After a discussion on irc we have two potential solution in order to introduce
a new bs-node_name member in order to be able to manipulate the graph from the
monitors.
The first one is to make the QMP device parameter of the block commands optional
and add the node-name parameter as a
On Mon, 10/28 16:40, Benoît Canet wrote:
Hi list,
After a discussion on irc we have two potential solution in order to introduce
a new bs-node_name member in order to be able to manipulate the graph from
the
monitors.
The first one is to make the QMP device parameter of the block
14 matches
Mail list logo
