Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-16 Thread Christian MICHON
based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail (in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on windows hosts :( -- Christian ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-16 Thread Christian MICHON
sorry I meant :) it's a stupid typo mistake... basically: video is faster, hdd access is faster. I'll see if I can gather more figures. I hope too we can put these improvements back inside qemu of course! :) On 1/16/07, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:25,

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-16 Thread Paul Brook
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:25, Christian MICHON wrote: based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail (in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on windows hosts :( Why is that a bad thing? VirtualBox is GPL, kqemu is not, so I'd say VirtualBox being

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-16 Thread Ottavio Caruso
--- Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting! Does anybody know if and where I could finf [sic!]a Windows binary via http/ftp? Unfortunately I can't torrent! I am sorry! A Windows binary was actually provided and I have later installed it, but I am not going touse it as it is not

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-16 Thread Ottavio Caruso
--- Oliver Gerlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de: http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680 Also on Slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml And the original news: http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/News

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-16 Thread Marc Lörner
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 15:12, Ottavio Caruso wrote: --- Oliver Gerlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de: http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680 Also on Slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml And the

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-15 Thread Pierre Palatin
On Monday 15 January 2007 20:02, Oliver Gerlich wrote: Hello, as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de: http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680 Also on Slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml And the original news:

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-15 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
What I don't see (and I hope they would answer) are any patches for QEMU which fixes things like installation of XP (the famous freeze), Vista, etc.. Anyone from InnoTek (I assume they're on the mailing list ) care to shed some light about patches, availability etc please? Thanks, Hetz On

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-15 Thread Oliver Gerlich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oliver Gerlich schrieb: Hello, as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de: http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680 Also on Slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml And the original news:

Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source

2007-01-15 Thread Dan Shearer
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:29:41PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote: It seems like VB doesn't use something like -kernel-kqemu; during Ubuntu boot, host CPU was only used by userland apps, while with Qemu with -kernel-kqemu 80% of host CPU was used by kernel. According to