On 7/10/20 11:20 AM, Ahmed Karaman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> If you identify a drop in performance due to a commit linking to it from
>> the report wouldn't be a bad idea so those that want to quickly
>> replicate the test can do before/after runs.
>>
>
>
Ahmed Karaman writes:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ahmed Karaman writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The third report of the TCG Continuous Benchmarking series utilizes
>> > the tools presented in the previous report for comparing the
>> > performance of 17
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>
> Ahmed Karaman writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The third report of the TCG Continuous Benchmarking series utilizes
> > the tools presented in the previous report for comparing the
> > performance of 17 different targets across two versions of
Ahmed Karaman writes:
> Hi,
>
> The third report of the TCG Continuous Benchmarking series utilizes
> the tools presented in the previous report for comparing the
> performance of 17 different targets across two versions of QEMU. The
> two versions addressed are 5.0 and 5.1-pre-soft-freeze
Hi,
The third report of the TCG Continuous Benchmarking series utilizes
the tools presented in the previous report for comparing the
performance of 17 different targets across two versions of QEMU. The
two versions addressed are 5.0 and 5.1-pre-soft-freeze (current state
of QEMU).
After
