On 22.10.2012 19:37, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
IOW:
q35-next - bleeding edge version of code. No compatibility guarantee
q35-0.1 - if we decide we want to have a tech preview of q35 that's
incomplete but will be supported for compat
q35-1.0 - the first complete release of q35
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:58:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Would it make sense to temporarily rename the machine type e.g.
pc-q35-experimental to stress it's not fully supported?
I don't think this is needed as piix will continue to be the default.
Well q35 is not yet 100%
On 10/22/12 12:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:58:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Would it make sense to temporarily rename the machine type e.g.
pc-q35-experimental to stress it's not fully supported?
I don't think this is needed as piix will continue to be
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:37:39PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 10/22/12 12:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:58:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Would it make sense to temporarily rename the machine type e.g.
pc-q35-experimental to stress it's not fully
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:43:25PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
Hi,
Qemu bits for q35 support, I'm posting the seabios changes separately. The
patches require '-M pc_q35' and -L 'seabios dir with q35 changes' on the
qemu command line. Hopefully, we can make it the default for x86 at some
On 10/22/2012 07:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I worry about need to maintain bug for bug compatibility on the
unlikely chance that the work to complete it gets delayed and we release
it in an unready state.
But in any case this needs
discussion with the libvirt folks to make sure it
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:00:56AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/22/2012 07:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I worry about need to maintain bug for bug compatibility on the
unlikely chance that the work to complete it gets delayed and we release
it in an unready state.
But in any
On 10/22/2012 08:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:00:56AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/22/2012 07:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I worry about need to maintain bug for bug compatibility on the
unlikely chance that the work to complete it gets delayed and we
On 22.10.2012, at 16:03, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/22/2012 08:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:00:56AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/22/2012 07:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I worry about need to maintain bug for bug compatibility on the
unlikely chance that
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:37:39PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 10/22/12 12:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:58:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Would it make sense to temporarily rename the machine type e.g.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:43:25PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
Hi,
Qemu bits for q35 support, I'm posting the seabios changes separately. The
patches require '-M pc_q35' and -L 'seabios dir with q35 changes' on the
qemu command line. Hopefully, we can make it the default for x86 at some
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:43:25PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
Hi,
Qemu bits for q35 support, I'm posting the seabios changes separately. The
patches require '-M pc_q35' and -L 'seabios dir with q35 changes' on the
qemu command line. Hopefully, we can make it the default for x86 at some
Hi,
Would it make sense to temporarily rename the machine type e.g.
pc-q35-experimental to stress it's not fully supported?
I don't think this is needed as piix will continue to be the default.
It will also cause trouble with libvirt when pc-q35-experimental goes
away some day.
cheers,
On 20.10.2012 00:43, Jason Baron wrote:
Hi,
Qemu bits for q35 support, I'm posting the seabios changes separately. The
patches require '-M pc_q35' and -L 'seabios dir with q35 changes' on the
Just a small maybe-nitpick: can we ue pc-q35 here instead of pc_q35 (ie,
minus instead of
14 matches
Mail list logo
