On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/03/21 11:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > It needs to be faster. Mostly I do check the gitlab CI pipeline
> > status, but in the run-up to getting rc0 out I stopped waiting
> > for the gitlab CI job to finish, because I was
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 11:05, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 25/03/21 11:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > It needs to be faster. Mostly I do check the gitlab CI pipeline
> > status, but in the run-up to getting rc0 out I stopped waiting
> > for the gitlab CI job to finish, because I was continually
On 25/03/21 11:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
It needs to be faster. Mostly I do check the gitlab CI pipeline
status, but in the run-up to getting rc0 out I stopped waiting
for the gitlab CI job to finish, because I was continually finding
that I kicked off a run, my local build-tests would complete
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 09:33, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> v6.0 is at the door and I was wondering what is missing to have the
> CI used as a gate.
It needs to be faster. Mostly I do check the gitlab CI pipeline
status, but in the run-up to getting rc0 out I stopped waiting
for the gitlab CI
On 3/25/21 10:29 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 3/25/21 6:43 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 24/03/2021 22.58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 3/24/21 7:33 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/24/21 7:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Peter's current
On 3/25/21 6:43 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 24/03/2021 22.58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 3/24/21 7:33 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 3/24/21 7:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi,
Peter's current workflow is push to /staging and if his
testing succeeds,
On 24/03/2021 22.58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/24/21 7:33 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/24/21 7:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi,
Peter's current workflow is push to /staging and if his
testing succeeds, he pushes the same commit as /master.
IMO there is no point in
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:01:12PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Peter's current workflow is push to /staging and if his
> testing succeeds, he pushes the same commit as /master.
>
> IMO there is no point in building /master branch, as it
> has already been built earlier as
On 3/24/21 7:33 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 3/24/21 7:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Peter's current workflow is push to /staging and if his
>> testing succeeds, he pushes the same commit as /master.
>>
>> IMO there is no point in building /master branch, as it
>> has
On 3/24/21 7:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Peter's current workflow is push to /staging and if his
> testing succeeds, he pushes the same commit as /master.
>
> IMO there is no point in building /master branch, as it
> has already been built earlier as /staging.
Also this might
Hi,
Peter's current workflow is push to /staging and if his
testing succeeds, he pushes the same commit as /master.
IMO there is no point in building /master branch, as it
has already been built earlier as /staging.
Regards,
Phil.
11 matches
Mail list logo
