On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:20:13PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
pci_get_byte, pci_get_word, pci_get_long and pci_get_quad
all take a const uint8_t pointer, because they only read
the configuration data.
Their prototypes should reflect this fact.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Richard Henderson wrote:
Richard Henderson (5):
tcg-sparc: Add tcg_out_arithc.
tcg-sparc: Implement add2, sub2, mulu2.
tcg-sparc: Do not remove %o[012] from 'r' constraint.
tcg-sparc: Implement division properly.
tcg-sparc: Implement ext32[su]_i64
Great work :-)
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/07/2010 10:24 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index 4084503..6a841de 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#includesys/mman.h
#includelinux/kvm.h
+#includelinux/kvm_para.h
The current names of GPXE romfiles are something like
pxe-e1000.bin, pxe-ne2k_pci.bin, pxe-rtl8139.bin.
This was adequate when these names were computed
by a simple rule using the device name.
Today, an ethernet device can be associated to any
romfile name.
Etherboot's Rom-o-Matic (which
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:50:15PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On
On 01/11/2010 03:18 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
The current names of GPXE romfiles are something like
pxe-e1000.bin, pxe-ne2k_pci.bin, pxe-rtl8139.bin.
This was adequate when these names were computed
by a simple rule using the device name.
Today, an ethernet device can be associated to any
romfile
On 01/11/2010 02:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/07/2010 10:24 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index 4084503..6a841de 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#includesys/mman.h
On 01/11/2010 02:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:18:51PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:38:53PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:07:26PM
Anthony Liguori schrieb:
On 01/11/2010 02:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:18:51PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:38:53PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb:
On Thu, Jan
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On
On 01/11/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
I haven't read this whole thread, but I really prefer things like
pci_set_vendor_id(pci_dev, );
A close alternative, would be some refactoring to allow PCI config
space to be represented as a C structure. Gerd had some patches at
one point for
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:30:18PM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
Current CDROM detection is hardcoded based on source file name.
Make this smarter by attempting a CDROM specific ioctl.
This makes '-cdrom /dev/sr0' succeed with no media present.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/11/2010 02:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/07/2010 10:24 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index 4084503..6a841de 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
Amit Shah wrote:
Are you talking about a VNC protocol command between qemu's VNC server
and the user's VNC client, or a private protocol between the guest and
qemu's VNC server?
What happens is:
1. Guest puts something on its clipboard
2. An agent on the guest gets notified of new
On 01/11/2010 06:13 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:30:18PM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
Current CDROM detection is hardcoded based on source file name.
Make this smarter by attempting a CDROM specific ioctl.
This makes '-cdrom /dev/sr0' succeed with no media present.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:57:15 -0600
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 01/11/2010 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi.
We (Markus and I) are working on getting QMP forward compatibility
support,
supported. :)
We have a plan for it and I'd like to ask the CC'ed
On 01/11/2010 06:04 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
As async messages were one of the reasons for having QMP, I thought
that there was a consensus that making it part of the original
protocol was ok, meaning that they would be always available.
That's the only reason.
Right, but then it's
On 01/11/2010 05:33 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
Are you talking about a VNC protocol command between qemu's VNC server
and the user's VNC client, or a private protocol between the guest and
qemu's VNC server?
What happens is:
1. Guest puts something on its clipboard
On 01/11/2010 02:39 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Fri) Jan 08 2010 [10:26:59], Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/08/2010 07:35 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Sometimes it looks like TCP is maintaining write boundaries, but it is
just an artifact of its behaviour on many systems, and is not reliable
On 01/06/2010 10:08 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Replace the funky array logic for queued commands with standard
qemu list functions. Also rename lsi_queue to lsi_request.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmannkra...@redhat.com
Applied all. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
---
hw/lsi53c895a.c |
The KVM project is announcing a regular conference call focused on KVM
development issues. The call will take place weekly on Tuesdays at
15:00 UTC for 1 hour. The purpose of the call is to discuss relevant
development issues in a high bandwidth forum, certainly _not_ meant
to supplant
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
1) administrivia
2) qemu 0.13 kvm feature merge issues
3) vhost-net todo's
Hi, Chris
We are interested in joining the conference, since we are now working on the
zero copy patch based on vhost-net.
Thanks
Xiaohui
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Chris Wright
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:28:34AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:11:18AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:58:40AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
No. You have to physically shut
Hi Anthony.
Although I know that you're busy catching up the holidays,
what's the status of this patch series?
It looks like that you've committed patches which conflicts
with it, so what can I do with this patch series to make
your merge easier?
thanks,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:39:24AM
On (Mon) Jan 11 2010 [18:28:52], Anthony Liguori wrote:
I would think that any buffering should be pushed back to the guest.
IOW, if there's available data from the char driver, but the guest
doesn't have a buffer. Don't select on the char driver until the guest
has a buffer available. If
On (Mon) Jan 11 2010 [23:33:56], Jamie Lokier wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
Are you talking about a VNC protocol command between qemu's VNC server
and the user's VNC client, or a private protocol between the guest and
qemu's VNC server?
What happens is:
1. Guest puts something on its
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:18:32PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/07/2010 10:24 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index 4084503..6a841de 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#includesys/mman.h
blk_mig_save_bulked_block is never called with sync flag. Remove the sync
flag. Calculate bulk completion during blk_mig_save_bulked_block.
Signed-off-by: Liran Schour lir...@il.ibm.com
---
block-migration.c | 63
1 files changed, 24
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
