On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> Several objects implemented their own uint property getters and setters,
> despite them being straightforward (without any checks/validations on
> the values themselves) and identical across objects. This makes use of
> an enhanced API
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> Currently, ich9_lpc_initfn simply serves as a caller to
> ich9_lpc_add_properties. This simplifies the code a bit by eliminating
> ich9_lpc_add_properties altogether and executing its logic in the parent
> object initialiser function.
>
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> When QOM APIs were added to ich9 in 6f1426ab, the getter for sci_int was
> written using uint32_t. However, the object property is uint8_t. This
> fixes the getter for correctness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi
Reviewed-by:
Hi
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> Traditionally, the uint-specific property helpers only offer getters.
> When adding object (or class) uint types, one must therefore use the
> generic property helper if a setter is needed (and probably duplicate
> some code writing
Hi Peter, Igor,
I couldn't find these 2 patches in the latest tree. Could you help to
merge them?
Thanks,
HG
On 2019/3/13 0:09, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:30:47 +0800
Heyi Guo wrote:
After the introduction of generic PCIe root port and PCIe-PCI bridge, we will
also have
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191129140217.17797-1-pbonz...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Subject: [PATCH for-5.0 0/8] docs: integrate doc comments with Sphinx build
Type: series
Message-id:
On Friday, November 29, 2019, Aleksandar Markovic <
aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, November 28, 2019, Alex Bennée
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Aleksandar Markovic writes:
>>
>> > On Thursday, November 28, 2019, Michael Rolnik
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't see why you say that the
Il ven 29 nov 2019, 19:54 Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha
scritto:
> > Yes, it's per thread. The state can be built from
> > capng_clear/capng_get_caps_process + capng_update, and left in there
> > forever. There is also capng_save_state/capng_restore_state which, as
> > far as I can see from the
On Thursday, November 28, 2019, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Aleksandar Markovic writes:
>
> > On Thursday, November 28, 2019, Michael Rolnik
> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't see why you say that the peripherals are inside the chip, there
> is
> >> CPU within target/avr directory and then there are some
The virtio-net fuzz target feeds inputs to all three virtio-net
virtqueues, and uses forking to avoid leaking state between fuzz runs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
tests/fuzz/Makefile.include | 1 +
tests/fuzz/virtio_net_fuzz.c | 105 +++
2 files
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
docs/devel/fuzzing.txt | 119 +
1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 docs/devel/fuzzing.txt
diff --git a/docs/devel/fuzzing.txt b/docs/devel/fuzzing.txt
new file mode 100644
index
The virtio-scsi fuzz target sets up and fuzzes the available virtio-scsi
queues. After an element is placed on a queue, the fuzzer can select
whether to perform a kick, or continue adding elements.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
tests/fuzz/Makefile.include | 1 +
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
tests/libqtest.c | 54
tests/libqtest.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/libqtest.c b/tests/libqtest.c
index a7df92319a..e0bc5bbe0b 100644
--- a/tests/libqtest.c
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
tests/fuzz/qos_fuzz.c | 232 ++
tests/fuzz/qos_fuzz.h | 33 ++
2 files changed, 265 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/fuzz/qos_fuzz.c
create mode 100644 tests/fuzz/qos_fuzz.h
diff --git
When using qtest "in-process" communication, qtest_sendf directly calls
a function in the server (qtest.c). Previously, bufwrite used
socket_send, which bypasses the TransportOps enabling the call into
qtest.c. This change replaces the socket_send calls with ops->send,
maintaining the benefits of
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
configure | 39 +++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 6099be1d84..5fb2494a8e 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ debug_mutex="no"
Before, when tests/Makefile.include was included, the contents would be
ignored if config-host.mak was defined. Moving the ifneq responsible for
this allows a target to depend on both testing-related and host-related
objects. For example the virtual-device fuzzer relies on both
libqtest/libqos
This makes it simple to swap the transport functions for qtest commands
to and from the qtest client. For example, now it is possible to
directly pass qtest commands to a server handler that exists within the
same process, without the standard way of writing to a file descriptor.
Signed-off-by:
tests/fuzz/fuzz.c serves as the entry point for the virtual-device
fuzzer. Namely, libfuzzer invokes the LLVMFuzzerInitialize and
LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput functions, both of which are defined in this
file. This change adds a "FuzzTarget" struct, along with the
fuzz_add_target function, which should
fork() is a simple way to ensure that state does not leak in between
fuzzing runs. Unfortunately, the fuzzer mutation engine relies on
bitmaps which contain coverage information for each fuzzing run, and
these bitmaps should be copied from the child to the parent(where the
mutation occurs). These
The handler allows a qtest client to send commands to the server by
directly calling a function, rather than using a file/CharBackend
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
include/sysemu/qtest.h | 1 +
qtest.c| 13 +
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny
---
Makefile| 15 ++-
Makefile.objs | 4 +++-
Makefile.target | 18 +-
tests/fuzz/Makefile.include | 4
4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
qtest_server_send is a function pointer specifying the handler used to
transmit data to the qtest client. In the standard configuration, this
calls the CharBackend handler, but now it is possible for other types of
handlers, e.g direct-function calls if the qtest client and server
exist within the
These three targets should simply fuzz reads/writes to a couple ioports,
but they mostly serve as examples of different ways to write targets.
They demonstrate using qtest and qos for fuzzing, as well as using
rebooting and forking to reset state, or not resetting it at all.
Signed-off-by:
The names i2c_send and i2c_recv collide with functions defined in
hw/i2c/core.c. This causes an error when linking against libqos and
softmmu simultaneously (for example when using qtest inproc). Rename the
libqos functions to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
---
tests/libqos/i2c.c
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
include/qemu/module.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/module.h b/include/qemu/module.h
index 65ba596e46..684753d808 100644
--- a/include/qemu/module.h
+++
The moved functions are not specific to qos-test and might be useful
elsewhere. For example the virtual-device fuzzer makes use of them for
qos-assisted fuzz-targets.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
tests/Makefile.include | 1 +
Most qos-related objects were specified in the qos-test-obj-y variable.
qos-test-obj-y also included qos-test.o which defines a main().
This made it difficult to repurpose qos-test-obj-y to link anything
beside tests/qos-test against libqos. This change separates objects that
are libqos-specific
This series adds a framework for coverage-guided fuzzing of
virtual-devices. Fuzzing targets are based on qtest and can make use of
the libqos abstractions.
In this version, I added a virtio-scsi fuzzer. The actual fuzzing code
is very similar to the the virtio-net fuzzer. I experimented with
A program might rely on functions implemented in vl.c, but implement its
own main(). By placing main into a separate source file, there are no
complaints about duplicate main()s when linking against vl.o. For
example, the virtual-device fuzzer uses a main() provided by libfuzzer,
and needs to
The virtual-device fuzzer must initialize QOM, prior to running
vl:qemu_init, so that it can use the qos_graph to identify the arguments
required to initialize a guest for libqos-assisted fuzzing. This change
prevents errors when vl:qemu_init tries to (re)initialize the previously
initialized QOM
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:01:54PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> > On 29/11/19 11:07, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> So user who wants something non trivial could override default
> non-numa behavior with
> -object
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:31:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/11/19 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 06:15:16PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Setting up shared memory for vhost-user is a bit complicated from
> >> command line, as it requires
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:45:09PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 12:26, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > But from the my very limited understanding, on real hardware,
> > once device is uplugged it's gone (finalized) from machine
> > perspective, so it's unclear to my why someone
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 29.11.2019 18:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>
>>> 29.11.2019 17:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.11.2019 17:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>>
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:33:58 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:00:06PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > Hi; this is a question which came up in Damien's reset series
> > > which I don't know the
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 03:07:32PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.11.19 13:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > re-adding ccs from the cover-letter
> >
> On 25.11.19 18:20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> As soon as dynamic feature groups are used, the CPU model becomes
>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The purpose of this series is to split the current reset procedure
> into multiple phases. This will help to solve some ordering
> difficulties we have during reset. Previous version can be found here:
>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Replace deprecated qdev_reset_all by resettable_cold_reset_fn for
> the ipl registration in the main reset handlers.
>
> This does not impact the behavior for the following reasons:
> + at this point resettable just call the old reset methods
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Transition the bcm2835_gpio device class to Resettable.
> The sdbus reparenting is delayed in hold phase to respect
> resettable side-effect rules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Hedde
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
thanks
-- PMM
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Split gpfsel_set() in 2 so that the sdbus reparenting is done
> in a dedicated function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Hedde
> ---
> Cc: Peter Maydell
> Cc: Andrew Baumann
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
> ---
>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Hedde
Subject line still says ".txt".
> ---
>
> Should I add an entry into index.rst ?
Yes, please.
I have one substantive comment on this patch: in the
MyDev example of implementing reset, you make the
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Replace deprecated qbus_reset_all by resettable_cold_reset_fn for
> the sysbus reset registration.
>
> Apart for the raspi machines, this does not impact the behavior
> because:
> + at this point resettable just call the old reset methods of
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 29/11/19 19:20, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> On 29/11/19 19:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> It's not entirely trivial because fsdev-proxy-helper wants to keep the
> effective set
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
The infrastructure to branch into model-specific code is pretty rough
right now, we might refine that, for example with some helper functions
(ati_get_model() returning an enum, or ati_is_$model() functions
returning bool, or both).
Maybe we could
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Deprecate device_legacy_reset(), qdev_reset_all() and
> qbus_reset_all() to be replaced by new functions
> device_cold_reset() and bus_cold_reset() which uses resettable API.
>
> Also introduce resettable_cold_reset_fn() which may be used as a
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> In qdev_set_parent_bus(), when changing the parent bus of a
> realized device, if the source and destination buses are not in the
> same reset state, some adaptation are required. This patch adds
"adaptations"
> needed call to
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> Add a function resettable_change_parent() to do the required
> plumbing when changing the parent a of Resettable object.
>
> We need to make sure that the reset state of the object remains
> coherent with the reset state of the new parent.
>
>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> This commit adds support of Resettable interface to buses and devices:
> + ResettableState structure is added in the Bus/Device state
> + Resettable methods are implemented.
> + device/bus_is_in_reset function defined
>
> This commit allows to
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:07, Damien Hedde wrote:
>
> This commit defines an interface allowing multi-phase reset. This aims
> to solve a problem of the actual single-phase reset (built in
> DeviceClass and BusClass): reset behavior is dependent on the order
> in which reset handlers are called.
On 29/11/19 19:20, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On 29/11/19 19:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
It's not entirely trivial because fsdev-proxy-helper wants to keep the
effective set and clear the permitted set; in libcap-ng you can only
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 29/11/19 19:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> It's not entirely trivial because fsdev-proxy-helper wants to keep the
> >> effective set and clear the permitted set; in libcap-ng you can only
> ^
>
> (Wrong, this is
On 29/11/19 19:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> It's not entirely trivial because fsdev-proxy-helper wants to keep the
>> effective set and clear the permitted set; in libcap-ng you can only
^
(Wrong, this is "modify" the permitted set. The permitted set is
already
From: Daniel Cho
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 10:43 AM
To: Zhang, Chen
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert ; lukasstra...@web.de;
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: Network connection with COLO VM
Hi David, Zhang,
Thanks for replying my question.
We know why will occur this issue.
As you said,
Hello,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Aaron Zakhrov wrote:
I tested my code with the vgabios-ati.bin rom file and it seems to get
passed the earlier issue I had.
Good, so then the BIOS problem seems to be sorted for now. (Maybe it
needed the tables or EDID support that some drivers use from the VGA
Currently, ich9_lpc_initfn simply serves as a caller to
ich9_lpc_add_properties. This simplifies the code a bit by eliminating
ich9_lpc_add_properties altogether and executing its logic in the parent
object initialiser function.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi
---
hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 15
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 29/11/19 10:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> y) Should we flip over to only using one or the other - what
> >> are the advantages?
> > In libvirt we use libcap-ng. We picked this originally as its API
> > design allows you do write simpler
Traditionally, the uint-specific property helpers only offer getters.
When adding object (or class) uint types, one must therefore use the
generic property helper if a setter is needed (and probably duplicate
some code writing their own getters/setters).
This enhances the uint-specific property
This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by enabling
a default getter/setter only when desired. To prevent an API behavioural change
(from clients that already used these helpers and did not want a setter), we
add a OBJ_PROP_FLAG_READ flag that allow clients to only have
When QOM APIs were added to ich9 in 6f1426ab, the getter for sci_int was
written using uint32_t. However, the object property is uint8_t. This
fixes the getter for correctness.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi
---
hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Several objects implemented their own uint property getters and setters,
despite them being straightforward (without any checks/validations on
the values themselves) and identical across objects. This makes use of
an enhanced API for object_property_add_uintXX_ptr() which offers
default setters.
On 29/11/19 13:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> As for "-m", I'd make it just an alias that translates
> -m/mem-path/mem-prealloc
I think we should just deprecate -mem-path/-mem-prealloc in 5.0. CCing
Thomas as mister deprecation. :)
> combination to appropriate '-object' for '-machine memdev'
On 2019-11-27, Alex Bennée wrote:
Fangrui Song writes:
For lld, --image-base is the preferred way to set the base address.
lld does not actually implement -Ttext-segment, but treats it as an alias for
-Ttext. -Ttext-segment=0x6000 combined with --no-rosegment can
create a 1.6GB
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 13:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 27/11/2019 14.24, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > It's broken so it's no longer helping. The latest Xcode is covered by
> > Cirrus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
> > ---
> > .travis.yml | 8 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7
> On Nov 29, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:14 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>> Heya,
>>
>>> On Nov 28, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:48 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
Thanks for the pointers philippe.. Is the patch okay to be merged without it or
do I need to do a re-submission with the updated username ?
- Bilal
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:phi...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 8:38 PM
To:
Hi
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 8:25 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:14 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> >>
> >> Heya,
> >>
> >>> On Nov 28, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> >>> wrote:
>
29.11.2019 18:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> 29.11.2019 17:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 29.11.2019 17:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> fit_load_fdt forget to check that errp is not NULL and
Libcap was dropped from virtio-9p, so remove it from the dockerfiles as well.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 1 -
tests/docker/dockerfiles/ubuntu.docker | 1 -
tests/docker/dockerfiles/ubuntu1804.docker | 1 -
3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 29.11.2019 17:35, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>
>>> 28.11.2019 23:29, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 28.11.2019 17:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 4:59 PM Wasim, Bilal wrote:
>
> Thanks for the pointers philippe.. Is the patch okay to be merged without it
> or do I need to do a re-submission with the updated username ?
If there are no review comments on your patch, I think the maintainer
taking your patch can fix
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> virtfs-proxy-helper is the only user of libcap; everyone else is using
> the simpler libcap-ng API. Switch and remove the configure code to
> detect libcap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> configure |
On 11/29/19 3:21 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
We currently enable libcap-dev in build-clang to pick up the 9p proxy
helper. Paolo's patch changes that to use libcap-ng, so switch to using
It is not obvious you are referring to "virtfs-proxy-helper:
On 11/29/19 3:21 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
We currently enable libcap-dev in build-clang to pick up the 9p proxy
helper. Paolo's patch changes that to use libcap-ng, so switch to using
It is not obvious you are referring to "virtfs-proxy-helper:
On 29.11.19 15:26, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.11.2019 17:17, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 29.11.19 14:55, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 29.11.2019 16:46, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.11.19 13:01, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 11.11.2019 19:02, Max Reitz wrote:
>>
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 10:08, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> the following changes since commit 1a61a081ac33ae6cb7dd2e38d119a572f416c7f7:
>
> Update version for v4.2.0-rc3 release (2019-11-26 21:52:26 +)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
>
Hi Bilal,
Cc'ing Jason, the maintainer of network devices.
On 11/29/19 4:05 PM, bilalwasim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: bwasim
Your git setup misses your 'user.name', you could fix it running:
git config user.name "Bilal Wasim"
(eventually with the --global option).
The patch looks good
On 29.11.19 15:34, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 11/29/19 3:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 29.11.19 15:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor
>>> calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset.
>>>
>>> As we formerly had only
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 28.11.2019 23:29, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>
>>> 28.11.2019 17:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> Error **errp is almost always OUT-argument: it's assumed to be NULL,
Hi
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:14 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
> > On Nov 28, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:48 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> >>
> >> Traditionally, the uint-specific property helpers only offer getters.
> >>
On 11/29/19 3:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 29.11.19 15:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor
>> calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset.
>>
>> As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for
>>
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 29.11.2019 17:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 29.11.2019 17:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>>
fit_load_fdt forget to check that errp is not NULL and to zero it after
freeing. Fix it.
Heya,
> On Nov 28, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:48 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>> Traditionally, the uint-specific property helpers only offer getters.
>> When adding object (or class) uint types, one must therefore use the
>> generic
29.11.2019 17:35, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> 28.11.2019 23:29, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>>
28.11.2019 17:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> Error **errp is
On 29.11.19 15:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor
> calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset.
>
> As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for
> initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a
From: bwasim
Loopback mode only works when specific conditions (as dictated
by the IP guide) are met, i.e. the MII_MODE is set and the
RMII_MODE is cleared. If not, we simply send the packet on the
output queue (for TX to the host network). Tested by running a
custom RTOS and TXing a ton of
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:06:41PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi Corey
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:44 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:24:36PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Instead, set the initial data field directly.
> > >
> > > (the initial data is
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
---
linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
index 3d9b18f7f8..3dd7c407e0 100644
--- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1000,6 +1000,7 @@
On 11/29/19 3:02 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
[...]
As a mgmt app I think there will be a need to be able to determine
whether a host + QEMU combo is actually able to support protected
machines. If the mgmt app is given an image and the users says it
required protected mode, then the mgmt app
On 29.11.19 14:55, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.11.2019 16:46, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 29.11.19 13:01, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 11.11.2019 19:02, Max Reitz wrote:
While bdrv_replace_node() will not follow through with it, a specific
@replaces asks the mirror job
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 14:05:23 +0100
Damien Hedde wrote:
> On 11/29/19 1:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 12:26, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> But from the my very limited understanding, on real hardware,
> >> once device is uplugged it's gone (finalized) from machine
> >>
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 02:21:26PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> We currently enable libcap-dev in build-clang to pick up the 9p proxy
> helper. Paolo's patch changes that to use libcap-ng, so switch to using
> it. This also means we'll be
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> fit_load_fdt forget to check that errp is not NULL and to zero it after
> freeing. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
> ---
> hw/core/loader-fit.c | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
We currently enable libcap-dev in build-clang to pick up the 9p proxy
helper. Paolo's patch changes that to use libcap-ng, so switch to using
it. This also means we'll be testing the scsi pr manager and the bridge
helper.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
On 11/29/19 1:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 29/11/2019 10.47, Janosch Frank wrote:
> [...]
>> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
>> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
>
> So if 8-10 are not valid in protected mode...
>
>> @@ -59,6
Import Linux's kernel-doc script, as well as the Linux extension to
call kernel-doc according to the arguments and parameters given to
a reStructuredText directive.
The kernel-doc extension accepts a filename, which is relative to
the QEMU source tree root. The extension also notifies Sphinx
CPU resets for protected guests need to be done via Ultravisor
calls. Hence we need a way to issue these calls for each reset.
As we formerly had only one reset function and it was called for
initial, as well as for the clear reset, we now need a new interface.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
---
On 29/11/2019 15.21, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> We currently enable libcap-dev in build-clang to pick up the 9p proxy
> helper. Paolo's patch changes that to use libcap-ng, so switch to using
> it. This also means we'll be testing the scsi pr
On 11/29/19 1:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:14:27PM +0100, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 11/29/19 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:43:19AM -0500, Janosch Frank wrote:
Most of the QEMU changes for PV are related to the new IPL type
From: Peter Maydell
Create a bitops.rst which is just a container for the
kernel-doc comments in qemu/bitops.h.
This is mostly a test of the kernel-doc extension machinery.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
Message-Id: <20190521122519.12573-7-peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
