On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:22:14 +0530
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 7/19/22 12:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 7/15/22 11:37, Xiaojuan Yang wrote:
> >> In loongarch_cpu_class_by_name(char *cpu_model) function,
> >> the argument cpu_model already has the suffix '-loongarch-cpu',
> >> so we shou
On 7/19/22 12:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/15/22 11:37, Xiaojuan Yang wrote:
In loongarch_cpu_class_by_name(char *cpu_model) function,
the argument cpu_model already has the suffix '-loongarch-cpu',
so we should remove the LOONGARCH_CPU_TYPE_NAME(cpu_model) macro.
And add the assertion that
On 7/15/22 11:37, Xiaojuan Yang wrote:
In loongarch_cpu_class_by_name(char *cpu_model) function,
the argument cpu_model already has the suffix '-loongarch-cpu',
so we should remove the LOONGARCH_CPU_TYPE_NAME(cpu_model) macro.
And add the assertion that 'cpu_model' resolves to a class of the
appr
In loongarch_cpu_class_by_name(char *cpu_model) function,
the argument cpu_model already has the suffix '-loongarch-cpu',
so we should remove the LOONGARCH_CPU_TYPE_NAME(cpu_model) macro.
And add the assertion that 'cpu_model' resolves to a class of the
appropriate type.
Signed-off-by: Xiaojuan Ya
