Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-08-15 Thread Anthony Liguori
Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de writes: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. The coded was

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-08-02 Thread Peter Lieven
On 31.07.2013 10:01, Markus Armbruster wrote: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-08-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. The coded was intended to be GPLv2.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-08-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. The coded was intended to be GPLv2. I guess some day

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-07-31 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com Cc: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com Cc: Markus

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-07-31 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 31.07.2013 um 08:19 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-07-31 Thread Markus Armbruster
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com Cc:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-07-31 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Cc: Kevin Wolf

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-07-31 Thread Jeff Cody
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Cc: Kevin Wolf

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header

2013-07-31 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:19:51 +0200 Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote: Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Cc: