Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de writes:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
The coded was
On 31.07.2013 10:01, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
I guess some day
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com
Cc: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
Cc: Markus
Am 31.07.2013 um 08:19 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com
Cc:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Cc: Kevin Wolf
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Cc: Kevin Wolf
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:19:51 +0200
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Cc:
10 matches
Mail list logo