On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>
> With appropriate AMR-like masks. Not actually used by the translation
> logic at that point
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> [clg: add the use of spr_register_kvm_hv()]
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater
> ---
> target-ppc/cpu.h| 1 +
> target-ppc/translate_init.c | 38 ++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu.h b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> index 6952d789e518..81a3e6b5ed29 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1364,6 +1364,7 @@ static inline int cpu_mmu_index (CPUPPCState *env, bool
> ifetch)
> #define SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0 (0x03A)
> #define SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1 (0x03B)
> #define SPR_BOOKE_DEAR(0x03D)
> +#define SPR_IAMR (0x03D)
> #define SPR_BOOKE_ESR (0x03E)
> #define SPR_BOOKE_IVPR(0x03F)
> #define SPR_MPC_EIE (0x050)
> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> index f2eb5f041ecd..2fac6ea58698 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,36 @@ static void spr_write_uamor(DisasContext *ctx, int
> sprn, int gprn)
> tcg_temp_free(t1);
> tcg_temp_free(t2);
> }
> +
> +static void spr_write_iamr(DisasContext *ctx, int sprn, int gprn)
> +{
> +TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> +TCGv t1 = tcg_temp_new();
> +TCGv t2 = tcg_temp_new();
> +
> +/* Note, the HV=1 case is handled earlier by simply using
> + * spr_write_generic for HV mode in the SPR table
> + */
> +
> +/* Build insertion mask into t1 based on context */
> +gen_load_spr(t1, SPR_AMOR);
> +
> +/* Mask new bits into t2 */
> +tcg_gen_and_tl(t2, t1, cpu_gpr[gprn]);
> +
> +/* Load AMR and clear new bits in t0 */
> +gen_load_spr(t0, SPR_IAMR);
> +tcg_gen_andc_tl(t0, t0, t1);
> +
> +/* Or'in new bits and write it out */
> +tcg_gen_or_tl(t0, t0, t2);
> +gen_store_spr(SPR_IAMR, t0);
> +spr_store_dump_spr(SPR_IAMR);
> +
> +tcg_temp_free(t0);
> +tcg_temp_free(t1);
> +tcg_temp_free(t2);
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
>
> static void gen_spr_amr(CPUPPCState *env, bool has_iamr)
> @@ -1161,6 +1191,14 @@ static void gen_spr_amr(CPUPPCState *env, bool
> has_iamr)
> SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS,
> _read_generic, _write_generic,
> 0);
> +if (!has_iamr) {
> +return;
> +}
> +spr_register_kvm_hv(env, SPR_IAMR, "IAMR",
> +SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +_read_generic, _write_iamr,
> +_read_generic, _write_generic,
> +KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR, 0);
In case you rework this patch (e.g. by putting the has_iamr parameter
from the last patch in here), I think I'd also rather write this as:
if (has_iamr) {
spr_register_kvm_hv(...
}
That would be slightly easier to read.
Apart from that, the patch looks fine to me.
Thomas