Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] PC system flash support

2011-12-20 Thread Avi Kivity
On 12/19/2011 08:27 PM, Jordan Justen wrote: On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:04, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/15/2011 11:02 PM, Jordan Justen wrote: I verified that 'info mtree' and 'info qdev' are equivalent for pc-1.0 when using master and with my patches. However, I did

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] PC system flash support

2011-12-19 Thread Jordan Justen
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:04, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/15/2011 11:02 PM, Jordan Justen wrote: I verified that 'info mtree' and 'info qdev' are equivalent for pc-1.0 when using master and with my patches. However, I did discover that v1.0 seems to differ from master for this

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] PC system flash support

2011-12-18 Thread Avi Kivity
On 12/15/2011 11:02 PM, Jordan Justen wrote: I verified that 'info mtree' and 'info qdev' are equivalent for pc-1.0 when using master and with my patches. However, I did discover that v1.0 seems to differ from master for this same test. That's are fine; pre-memory-API devices don't show up

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] PC system flash support

2011-12-15 Thread Jordan Justen
Enable flash emulation in a PC system using pflash_cfi01. v9: * Add pc-1.1 * pc-1.0 uses previous rom firmware init code path v8: * Cleanup two chunks of debug code (printf messages) * Fix comment in pc.h (pcflash.c = pc_sysfw.c) v7: * Do not add system firmware to qemu roms * If kvm is

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] PC system flash support

2011-12-15 Thread Jordan Justen
I verified that 'info mtree' and 'info qdev' are equivalent for pc-1.0 when using master and with my patches. However, I did discover that v1.0 seems to differ from master for this same test. I've attached the logs. --- v1.0-pc.log 2011-12-15 12:14:53.0 -0800 +++ master-pc-1.0.log