Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 9 March 2018 at 14:28, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > NB: there was a test failure on OpenBSD host: >> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 March 2018 at 14:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > > NB: there was a test failure on OpenBSD host: > > > > TEST: tests/qom-test... (pid=64016) > > /riscv32/qom/spike_v1.9.1:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On 9 March 2018 at 14:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > NB: there was a test failure on OpenBSD host: > > TEST: tests/qom-test... (pid=64016) > /riscv32/qom/spike_v1.9.1: ** > ERROR:/home/qemu/tests/qom-test.c:64:test_properties:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On 9 March 2018 at 15:15, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Michael Clark writes: > > >> >> BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: >> >> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix >> -

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

Michael Clark writes: > > BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: > > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2 > -

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 March 2018 at 19:53, Michael Clark wrote: > > I re-iterate Palmer's apology. > > > > I shouldn't be polling git.qemu.org/qemu.git and answering emails near > to > > 3am in the morning after 4

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On 8 March 2018 at 19:53, Michael Clark wrote: > I re-iterate Palmer's apology. > > I shouldn't be polling git.qemu.org/qemu.git and answering emails near to > 3am in the morning after 4 months of working on trying to get the RISC-V > port in shape to go upstream. > > It appears

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 03:41:33 PST (-0800), Michael Clark wrote: > >> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:18 AM, Michael Clark wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:10 AM, Michael Clark wrote: >>>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 03:41:33 PST (-0800), Michael Clark wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:18 AM, Michael Clark wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:10 AM, Michael Clark wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 at 11:02 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: On 6

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 02:26:12 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > > It was qemu-2.7.50 (late 2016). The benchmarks were generated mid last > year. > > > > I can run the benchmarks again... Has it doubled in speed? > > It

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 02:26:12 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > It was qemu-2.7.50 (late 2016). The benchmarks were generated mid last year. > > I can run the benchmarks again... Has it doubled in speed? It depends on the benchmarks. Small-ish benchmarks such as rv8-bench show about a 1.5x

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:53 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 28 February 2018 at 00:09, Michael Clark wrote: >> > I've just talked to SiFive about this. They have agreed

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 13:09:11 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > > BTW somewhat coincidentally, the binary translator I wrote; RV8, which is > > practicaly twice as fast as QEMU only supports privileged ISA v1.9.1 and > I > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 13:09:11 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > BTW somewhat coincidentally, the binary translator I wrote; RV8, which is > practicaly twice as fast as QEMU only supports privileged ISA v1.9.1 and I > personally want to keep binary compatiblity with it. (snip) > - https://rv8.io/ >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 February 2018 at 00:09, Michael Clark wrote: > > I've just talked to SiFive about this. They have agreed that we can > remove > > the sifive_e300 and sifive_u500 boards from the patch series

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On 28 February 2018 at 11:53, Peter Maydell wrote: > With my 'upstream dev' hat on, I tend to be suspicious of this > line of argument, because in a lot of cases what tends to happen > is that the code for some new target or device goes in-tree, and > then the people who

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On 28 February 2018 at 00:09, Michael Clark wrote: > I've just talked to SiFive about this. They have agreed that we can remove > the sifive_e300 and sifive_u500 boards from the patch series that we are > going to submit upstream again later this week or early next week. These >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:41:25 +1300 Michael Clark wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:01:05 + > > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:01:05 + > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 15:50, Stef O'Rear wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:50 AM, Stef O'Rear wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On 27 February 2018 at 15:50, Stef O'Rear wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: >>> The spike_v1.9 >>> machine has been renamed to spike_v1.9.1 to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The following changes since commit 0a773d55ac76c5aa89ed9187a3bc5af8c5c2a6d0: >> >>