Re: [Qemu-devel] MTTCG next version?

Paolo Bonzini writes: > I am on vacation so no calls for me, but I *might* be able to send a pull > request with the linux-user patches (and signal-free kick if reviewed). My > queue is already long, and Emilio had useful fixups so he obviously > tested/reviewed them. It

Re: [Qemu-devel] MTTCG next version?

Hi Frederic, On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Frederic Konrad wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm trying to do the next version of the MTTCG work: > > I would like to rebase on Alvise atomic instruction branch: > - Alvise can you rebase it on the 2.4.0 version without

Re: [Qemu-devel] MTTCG next version?

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 14:18:24 +0200, Frederic Konrad wrote: Do that make sense? A few decisions here don't make that much sense to me, but maybe I'm missing context: I'm trying to do the next version of the MTTCG work: I would like to rebase on Alvise atomic instruction branch: -

[Qemu-devel] MTTCG next version?

Hi everybody, I'm trying to do the next version of the MTTCG work: I would like to rebase on Alvise atomic instruction branch: - Alvise can you rebase it on the 2.4.0 version without MTTCG support and then point me to the MTTCG specific changes so I can include them in my tree? I will

Re: [Qemu-devel] MTTCG next version?

Just to remind everybody as well - we’ll have a call next Monday to co-ordinate. It would be good to make sure everybody knows which bit of this everybody else is committing to do, so we avoid replication and treading on each others patch sets. Cheers Mark. On 26 Aug 2015, at 14:18, Frederic

Re: [Qemu-devel] MTTCG next version?

I am on vacation so no calls for me, but I *might* be able to send a pull request with the linux-user patches (and signal-free kick if reviewed). My queue is already long, and Emilio had useful fixups so he obviously tested/reviewed them. It will not be signed though as I tend not to have the