Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] [PATCH v8 10/35] RISC-V: Remove erroneous comment from translate.c

2018-04-25 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:45:13 PDT (-0700), Michael Clark wrote: Cc: Sagar Karandikar Cc: Bastian Koppelmann Cc: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Alistair Francis Signed-off-by: Michael Clark

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] [PATCH v1 1/1] RISC-V: Workaround for critical mstatus.FS MTTCG bug

2018-03-27 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:54:47 PDT (-0700), Michael Clark wrote: This change is a workaround for a bug where mstatus.FS is not correctly reporting dirty when MTTCG and SMP are enabled which results in the floating point register file not being saved during context switches. This a critical bug for

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-27 Thread Michael Clark
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > I will divide the series up into 3 branches, and move through them in > order of priority, with correctness ahead of tidyness: > > 1). riscv-qemu-2.12-critical-fixes > 2). riscv-qemu-2.13-bug-fixes > 3).

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-27 Thread Michael Clark
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 26 March 2018 at 19:07, Michael Clark wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Peter Maydell > > > wrote: > >> Hi. It looks to me like a fair number of these

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-27 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:45:34PM -0700, Michael Clark wrote: > I've made a tag for the series including the fixes from my own review > during the weekend (one logic fix and 2 comment of commit log typos, and a > patch hunk in the wrong commit): > > -

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-27 Thread Peter Maydell
On 26 March 2018 at 19:07, Michael Clark wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> Hi. It looks to me like a fair number of these patches >> are already reviewed, so we don't need to wait on the >> rest being reviewed to get

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-26 Thread Michael Clark
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Michael Clark wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Peter Maydell >> wrote: >> >>> On 24 March 2018 at 18:13, Michael Clark

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-26 Thread Michael Clark
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 24 March 2018 at 18:13, Michael Clark wrote: >> > This is a series of bug fixes and code cleanups that we

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] RISC-V: Fixes and cleanups for QEMU 2.12

2018-03-26 Thread Michael Clark
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 24 March 2018 at 18:13, Michael Clark wrote: > > This is a series of bug fixes and code cleanups that we would > > like to get in before the QEMU 2.12 release. We are respinning > > v6 of this

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v4 26/26] RISC-V: Fix riscv_isa_string memory size bug

2018-03-20 Thread Michael Clark
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Le mar. 20 mars 2018 12:52, Peter Maydell a > écrit : > >> On 19 March 2018 at 21:18, Michael Clark wrote: >> > This version uses a constant size memory buffer sized for

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] RISC-V Post-merge spec conformance and cleanup

2018-03-16 Thread Michael Clark
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:06 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > more information: > > Type: series > Message-id: 1521229281-73637-1-git-send-email-...@sifive.com > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/24] RISC-V

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Michael Clark
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 9 March 2018 at 14:28, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > NB: there was a test failure on OpenBSD host: >> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Michael Clark
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 March 2018 at 14:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > > NB: there was a test failure on OpenBSD host: > > > > TEST: tests/qom-test... (pid=64016) > > /riscv32/qom/spike_v1.9.1:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Peter Maydell
On 9 March 2018 at 14:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > NB: there was a test failure on OpenBSD host: > > TEST: tests/qom-test... (pid=64016) > /riscv32/qom/spike_v1.9.1: ** > ERROR:/home/qemu/tests/qom-test.c:64:test_properties:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Peter Maydell
On 9 March 2018 at 15:15, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Michael Clark writes: > > >> >> BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: >> >> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix >> -

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Alex Bennée
Michael Clark writes: > > BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: > > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2 > -

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Michael Clark
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 March 2018 at 19:53, Michael Clark wrote: > > I re-iterate Palmer's apology. > > > > I shouldn't be polling git.qemu.org/qemu.git and answering emails near > to > > 3am in the morning after 4

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-09 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 March 2018 at 19:53, Michael Clark wrote: > I re-iterate Palmer's apology. > > I shouldn't be polling git.qemu.org/qemu.git and answering emails near to > 3am in the morning after 4 months of working on trying to get the RISC-V > port in shape to go upstream. > > It appears

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-08 Thread Michael Clark
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 03:41:33 PST (-0800), Michael Clark wrote: > >> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:18 AM, Michael Clark wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:10 AM, Michael Clark wrote: >>>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

2018-03-08 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 03:41:33 PST (-0800), Michael Clark wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:18 AM, Michael Clark wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 12:10 AM, Michael Clark wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 at 11:02 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: On 6

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-03-05 Thread Michael Clark
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 02:26:12 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > > It was qemu-2.7.50 (late 2016). The benchmarks were generated mid last > year. > > > > I can run the benchmarks again... Has it doubled in speed? > > It

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-03-05 Thread Emilio G. Cota
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 02:26:12 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > It was qemu-2.7.50 (late 2016). The benchmarks were generated mid last year. > > I can run the benchmarks again... Has it doubled in speed? It depends on the benchmarks. Small-ish benchmarks such as rv8-bench show about a 1.5x

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-03-02 Thread Michael Clark
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:53 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 28 February 2018 at 00:09, Michael Clark wrote: >> > I've just talked to SiFive about this. They have agreed

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-03-02 Thread Michael Clark
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 13:09:11 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > > BTW somewhat coincidentally, the binary translator I wrote; RV8, which is > > practicaly twice as fast as QEMU only supports privileged ISA v1.9.1 and > I > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-28 Thread Emilio G. Cota
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 13:09:11 +1300, Michael Clark wrote: > BTW somewhat coincidentally, the binary translator I wrote; RV8, which is > practicaly twice as fast as QEMU only supports privileged ISA v1.9.1 and I > personally want to keep binary compatiblity with it. (snip) > - https://rv8.io/ >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-28 Thread Michael Clark
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 February 2018 at 00:09, Michael Clark wrote: > > I've just talked to SiFive about this. They have agreed that we can > remove > > the sifive_e300 and sifive_u500 boards from the patch series

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-28 Thread Peter Maydell
On 28 February 2018 at 11:53, Peter Maydell wrote: > With my 'upstream dev' hat on, I tend to be suspicious of this > line of argument, because in a lot of cases what tends to happen > is that the code for some new target or device goes in-tree, and > then the people who

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-28 Thread Peter Maydell
On 28 February 2018 at 00:09, Michael Clark wrote: > I've just talked to SiFive about this. They have agreed that we can remove > the sifive_e300 and sifive_u500 boards from the patch series that we are > going to submit upstream again later this week or early next week. These >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-28 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:41:25 +1300 Michael Clark wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:01:05 + > > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-27 Thread Michael Clark
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:01:05 + > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-27 Thread Michael Clark
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 15:50, Stef O'Rear wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-27 Thread Michael Clark
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:50 AM, Stef O'Rear wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-27 Thread Peter Maydell
On 27 February 2018 at 15:50, Stef O'Rear wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: >>> The spike_v1.9 >>> machine has been renamed to spike_v1.9.1 to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

2018-02-27 Thread Stef O'Rear
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 00:15, Michael Clark wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The following changes since commit 0a773d55ac76c5aa89ed9187a3bc5af8c5c2a6d0: >> >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches

2015-07-16 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 15 July 2015 at 09:52, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 09:12, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Stefan,

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches

2015-07-15 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 09:12, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Stefan, Peter, Is patches down? I don't see any patches for the last 3 days and there is definitely new things on list: $ ./patches fetch

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches

2015-07-15 Thread Peter Maydell
On 15 July 2015 at 09:52, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 09:12, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Stefan, Peter, Is patches down? I don't see any patches for the last 3

[Qemu-devel] Patches

2015-07-14 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
Hi Stefan, Peter, Is patches down? I don't see any patches for the last 3 days and there is definitely new things on list: $ ./patches fetch http://vmsplice.net/~patches/patches.json Fetched info on 689 patch series Fetching mboxes... $ ./patches list | more Message-id:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches

2015-07-14 Thread Peter Maydell
On 14 July 2015 at 09:12, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Stefan, Peter, Is patches down? I don't see any patches for the last 3 days and there is definitely new things on list: $ ./patches fetch http://vmsplice.net/~patches/patches.json Fetched info on 689 patch

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches

2015-07-14 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:12:22AM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: Hi Stefan, Peter, Is patches down? I don't see any patches for the last 3 days and there is definitely new things on list: $ ./patches fetch http://vmsplice.net/~patches/patches.json Please switch ~/.patchesrc to this new

[Qemu-devel] Patches database is now being updated again

2015-05-08 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
To all 'patches' tool users, The patches database at the official URL is now being updated again: $ patches fetch http://wiki.qemu.org/patches/patches.json For the past year or so I published the patches database on my personal domain. This sometimes caused confusion since the official QEMU URL

[Qemu-devel] patches

2014-06-27 Thread l...@rich-leaders.com
Dear Sir/Madam, How are you? This is Lisa from WellSucceed Embroidery. We are professional manufacturer of patches. We can supply you high quality patches including woven patches, embroidery patches and printed patches. We can produce both small patches and back patches. At this

[Qemu-devel] [PATCHES] add virtio input device

2014-04-10 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Here comes a bunch of patches inplementing the virtio input device for review. One patch for the virtio specification. One patch for the linux kernel. A small patch series for qemu. Please review. Note that the qemu patch series has dependencies on unmerged input layer patches (waiting

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHES for 1.0] various spice usb-redir integration patches

2011-11-28 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 11/19/2011 03:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, Sorry for sending these in so late, I send most of them in before a long time ago, but then they got stuck on waiting for the big chardev rewrite. Since it seems clear now that the big chardev rewrite won't happen before 1.0, I would like to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHES for 1.0] various spice usb-redir integration patches

2011-11-22 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 11/21/11 22:05, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 11/19/2011 03:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, Sorry for sending these in so late, I send most of them in before a long time ago, but then they got stuck on waiting for the big chardev rewrite. Since it seems clear now that the big chardev

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHES for 1.0] various spice usb-redir integration patches

2011-11-21 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 11/19/2011 03:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, Sorry for sending these in so late, I send most of them in before a long time ago, but then they got stuck on waiting for the big chardev rewrite. Since it seems clear now that the big chardev rewrite won't happen before 1.0, I would like to

[Qemu-devel] [PATCHES for 1.0] various spice usb-redir integration patches

2011-11-19 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Sorry for sending these in so late, I send most of them in before a long time ago, but then they got stuck on waiting for the big chardev rewrite. Since it seems clear now that the big chardev rewrite won't happen before 1.0, I would like to get these into 1.0 as is. Thanks Regards,

[Qemu-devel] Patches for SMSC LAN911X driver

2011-11-11 Thread Cachet Bertrand
Hello, In the driver for the SMSC LAN9118 device (hw/lan9118.c), I modify the code to update the PM_CTRL register (switch PM_MODE bits to D0 and set (1b) READY bit ) when writing to the BYTE_TEST register. Writing to PM_CTRL was not permitted before this modification = raise an harware error

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches for SMSC LAN911X driver

2011-11-11 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi, Am 11.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Cachet Bertrand: Patch is contained in the following commit : https://bitbucket.org/bca/qemu-linaro/changeset/0aa1f76e5141 I have sent this patch to qemu-linaro but Peter Maydell (pm215 on #qemu IRC channel) told me to send it here because it is against

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches for SMSC LAN911X driver

2011-11-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On 11 November 2011 13:44, Cachet Bertrand bertrand.cac...@heig-vd.ch wrote: In the driver for the SMSC LAN9118 device (hw/lan9118.c), I modify the code to update the PM_CTRL register (switch PM_MODE bits to D0 and set (1b) READY bit ) when writing to the BYTE_TEST register. As Andreas says,

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches for OpenBSD support.

2010-12-20 Thread Blue Swirl
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Brad b...@comstyle.com wrote: Here are a few patches for OpenBSD support. Thanks. Could you resend each patch separately and add Signed-off-by: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com line before '---' line?

[Qemu-devel] Patches for OpenBSD support.

2010-12-19 Thread Brad
Here are a few patches for OpenBSD support. From 0477858c78d7e377bf6db8a498f7745a937c799d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:17:42 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for OpenBSD to QEMU's tap driver. --- net/tap-bsd.c |8 ++-- 1

[Qemu-devel] Patches in bug tracker also sent to mailing list?

2010-04-22 Thread Kraai, Matt
Hi, I've submitted two trivial patches against QEMU in its bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/568053 https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/568442 Is this sufficient or should I also submit them to the mailing list? Matt

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches in bug tracker also sent to mailing list?

2010-04-22 Thread Brian Jackson
On Thursday 22 April 2010 09:44:33 Kraai, Matt wrote: Hi, I've submitted two trivial patches against QEMU in its bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/568053 https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/568442 Is this sufficient or should I also submit them to the

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches in bug tracker also sent to mailing list?

2010-04-22 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Kraai, Matt matt.kr...@amo.abbott.com wrote: I’ve submitted two trivial patches against QEMU in its bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/568053 https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/568442 Is this sufficient or should I also submit them to the

[Qemu-devel] patches

2010-03-17 Thread Edgar E. Iglesias
Hi, I usually mail out negative test reults but this time I've just pulled and merged to my 4 different CRIS, PPC and MicroBlaze trees from upstream and things Just Worked. Good work to everybody involved! Cheers, Edgar

[Qemu-devel] Patches?

2008-03-17 Thread Gary Thomas
I've fixed a number of problems with the user mode code. Where's the best place to send/propose/discuss these? What's the preferred format? -- Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates |Embedded

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches?

2008-03-17 Thread C.W. Betts
On Monday 17 March 2008 07:19:18 am Gary Thomas wrote: I've fixed a number of problems with the user mode code. Where's the best place to send/propose/discuss these? What's the preferred format? The best place to send patches is this mailing list. I think they have to be a unified diff, i.e.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches?

2008-03-17 Thread Edgar E. Iglesias
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:19:18AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I've fixed a number of problems with the user mode code. Where's the best place to send/propose/discuss these? What's the preferred format? Hello Gary, Just send the patches to this list as unified diffs, preferably inlined to the

Re: [Qemu-devel] Patches?

2008-03-17 Thread Stuart Brady
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:42:51AM -0600, C.W. Betts wrote: The best place to send patches is this mailing list. I think they have to be a unified diff, i.e. diff -u. I'd also recommend using the '-p' option, which shows the name of the function that each change is in. Cheers, -- Stuart Brady

[Qemu-devel] Patches from pkgsrc for 0.9.1

2008-01-16 Thread Rumko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After more than 10 hours the article still didn't show up, so I'm resending just in case Some patches are present in pkgsrc that should be sent upstream, so I have attached the patches and some information about the patches below. patch-aa: some

[Qemu-devel] Patches from pkgsrc for 0.9.1

2008-01-16 Thread Rumko
Some patches are present in pkgsrc that should be sent upstream, so I have attached the patches and some information about the patches below. patch-aa: some machines have machine/bswap.h instead of byteswap.h patch-ab: qemu (op.c) shouldn't be compiled with the stack-protector turned on, so this

[Qemu-devel] Patches

2007-06-30 Thread Ben Taylor
There are two patches included in the mail 1) qemu-sdl-error.diff - patch to capture output from the sdl compile test, and output it if there is an error at reporting time (and delete the file when finished) 2) qemu-sdl-whitespace.diff - patch to fix the indentation for the sdl-config

[Qemu-devel] Patches review

2007-02-22 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
Can anybody review my patches? I have posted them three day ago but have no response yet. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

[Qemu-devel] Patches

2005-10-28 Thread malc
At http://www.boblycat.org/~malc/code/patches/qemu/ you will find latest audio, gus/opl3 and retrace patches. Highlights of the release: == Audio (15_aqemu) a. Major overhaul of whole audio subsystem 1. Does no longer depend

Re: [Qemu-devel] patches for qemu-cvs on NetBSD

2005-05-13 Thread Jason Brittain
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: Have you tried to see if the same problem appears with KQEMU installed on Linux host? Yes, I can confirm that the same thing happens with kqemu installed on Linux host with Linux guest. -- Jason Brittain ___ Qemu-devel mailing list