On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:08:21PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
PCI devices with different vendor or device ids sometimes share
the same rom code. Only the ids and the checksum
differs in a boot rom for such devices.
The i825xx ethernet controller family is a typical example
which is
Hi,
The i825xx ethernet controller family is a typical example
which is implemented in hw/eepro100.c. It uses at least
3 different device ids, so normally 3 boot roms would be needed.
Does this actually work now with the etherboot roms?
cheers,
Gerd
Am 20.10.2010 09:19, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
Hi,
The i825xx ethernet controller family is a typical example
which is implemented in hw/eepro100.c. It uses at least
3 different device ids, so normally 3 boot roms would be needed.
Does this actually work now with the etherboot roms?
cheers,
On 10/18/10 21:36, Stefan Weil wrote:
There is already some kind of error feedback: the rom will not work.
For etherboot roms, booting from network won't work.
VGA works, after hacking the vgabios to not have the PCI ID hardcoded
elsewhere.
Nevertheless /me gets the feeling that we better
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:55:11PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
PCI devices with different vendor or device ids sometimes share
the same rom code. Only the ids and the checksum
differs in a boot rom for such devices.
The i825xx ethernet controller family is a typical example
which is
On 10/18/2010 12:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:55:11PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
PCI devices with different vendor or device ids sometimes share
the same rom code. Only the ids and the checksum
differs in a boot rom for such devices.
The i825xx ethernet
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:42:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
+/* Patch the PCI vendor and device ids in a PCI rom image if necessary.
+ This is needed for an option rom which is used for more than one
device. */
+static void pci_patch_ids(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t *ptr, int size)
let's
Am 18.10.2010 21:03, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:42:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
+/* Patch the PCI vendor and device ids in a PCI rom image if
necessary.
+ This is needed for an option rom which is used for more than one
device. */
+static void
On 10/18/2010 02:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:42:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
+/* Patch the PCI vendor and device ids in a PCI rom image if necessary.
+ This is needed for an option rom which is used for more than one device. */
+static void
On 10/18/2010 02:36 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Maybe a more perfect solution would only patch the preconfigured
rom files but not user configured files, but I don't think we
need this degree of perfection.
Generally speaking, patching third-party code is not something that we
should get in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
