Peter Maydell writes:
> On 21 October 2016 at 19:26, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> "Device not pluggable" does not imply "device has no configuration knobs
>> a user may legitimately want to mess with". Plenty of onboard devices
>> have such knobs.
>>
On 21 October 2016 at 19:26, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Device not pluggable" does not imply "device has no configuration knobs
> a user may legitimately want to mess with". Plenty of onboard devices
> have such knobs.
>
> Right now, users configure these mostly via
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 18 October 2016 at 21:49, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Lots of stuff in a device's C struct is strictly internal
>>> and not to be messed with. I thought
On 19 October 2016 at 12:11, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> BTW, if most devices aren't supposed to be used with -device,
> possibly many of them don't have
> cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet set properly.
They used to be covered by hw/core/sysbus.c setting
it for them. In
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:08:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 October 2016 at 21:49, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Lots of stuff in a device's C struct is strictly internal
> >> and not to be messed
On 18 October 2016 at 21:49, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Lots of stuff in a device's C struct is strictly internal
>> and not to be messed with. I thought that QOM properties
>> were essentially how a device
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 October 2016 at 19:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> We actually have a concrete instance in the tree at the moment:
> >> the raspberry pi
On 18 October 2016 at 19:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> We actually have a concrete instance in the tree at the moment:
>> the raspberry pi 2. Specifically hw/arm/bcm2836.c sets the
>> mp_affinity for each cpu to
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 October 2016 at 18:57, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:07:49PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Why do you want to un-property mp_affinity? Eventually it would
> >> be nice for the