- Original Message -
> From: "Alex Bennée"
> To: "Paolo Bonzini"
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, c...@braap.org
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 7:38:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h improvements
>
>
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> > See each patch.
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> better example for future generations...
Are you posting a v2 of this? Alternatively I can slurp them into my
next patch set as I'v
On 13/10/2016 21:29, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> qht-bench: relax test_start/stop atomic accesses
>
> test_start/stop are used only as flags to loop on. Barriers are
> unnecessary,
> since no dependent data is transferred among threads apart from the flags
> themselves.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:39:55 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 15:59:02 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> > > didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> > > better example for
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 15:59:02 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> > didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> > better example for future generations...
>
> Just for context. Building on this patchse
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 15:59:02 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> better example for future generations...
Just for context. Building on this patchset, is it now
On 12/10/2016 13:32, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> > didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> > better example for future generations...
>
> Have you had a chance to check up on any of the errors "make ch
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> better example for future generations...
Have you had a chance to check up on any of the errors "make check"
throws up with the san
Hi,
Your series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h
improvements
Message-id: 1476107947-31430-1-git-se
Hi,
Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 1476107947-31430-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h
improvements
Type: series
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bi
10 matches
Mail list logo
