On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Ashijeet Acharya
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 18.10.2016 um 15:14 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> > Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
>>> >> O
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.10.2016 um 15:14 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> > Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> >> > Am
On 10/18/2016 08:33 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> I have successfully converted NFS block driver to use this set of
>> runtime opts which I think is the required condition to add
>> blockdev-add compatibility later. Also, since I do not have 'port' as
>> a runtime option, I can directly add blockdev-ad
Am 18.10.2016 um 15:14 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
> >> >>
> >>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>
Am 18.10.2016 um 14:46 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> >>>
> >>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
>>>
One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an
Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an
option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several
runtime_opts? T
On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an
> option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several
> runtime_opts? The reason I ask this because the uri syntax for NFS in
> QEMU looks like this:
>
>nfs:[
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
>
>> One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an
>> option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several
>> runtime_opts? The reason I ask this because the uri synt
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:39:30AM +0530, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was working on trying to add blockdev-add compatibility for the nfs
>> block driver but before that runtime options need to be separated into
>> various op
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:39:30AM +0530, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working on trying to add blockdev-add compatibility for the nfs
> block driver but before that runtime options need to be separated into
> various options rather than just a simple "filename" option.
>
> I have
12 matches
Mail list logo