Hi jef and all,
I guess it's better to have this discussion here than on a comment of line 351
of src/core/symbology-ng/qgsrendererv2.cpp at
https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/pull/3/files#r26150
Probably it would help other people (Is everybody already always using the
indentation scripts?
Hi Mayeul,
On Fri, 06. May 2011 at 19:19:24 +0200, mayeul.kauffm...@free.fr wrote:
I guess it's better to have this discussion here than on a comment of line
351 of src/core/symbology-ng/qgsrendererv2.cpp at
https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/pull/3/files#r26150
This wasn't meant get a huge
Hi Jürgen,
Thanks a lot for the detailed answer!! Sorry to have bothered you; I
agree standardizing indentation can be useful [in fact, it does not make
merging more difficult but easier: if indentation is standardized before
each commit, nobody will never ever have to merge indentation].
But
I noticed the srs.db was updated in the latest build. I can see crssync
running.
However, I don't see any changes in the proj4 definitions for EPSG:3168 and
EPSG:3375. They are missing the +gamma parameter. This parameter has already
been included in gdal 1.8.
C:\epsg_tr -proj4 3168
# Kertau
Radim,
Any chance you can apply this quick fix to a 1.7 build prior to final
release?
Math
On May 2, 2011 6:56 PM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch is simple, we have to wait for new repository
--- src/core/qgsrasterprojector.cpp (revision 15861)
+++
