,
Olivier
Images intégrées 1
__ Information from ESET Security, version of virus signature database
9595 (20140326) __
The message was checked by ESET Security.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
+1 with Nyall,
Labeling solution is probably the right one
Cordialement,
Régis Haubourg
Régis Haubourg
Administrateur de données Géographiques
Département des Systèmes d'Information (DCSI)
Agence de l'eau
+1 !
really nice mockup.
I would add another visibility state for layers that are checked, but are
not visible due to scale visualisation threshold.
A word about tooltips over those elements. We could then have the current
datasource tooltip on the datasource icon, and a tooltip showing metadata
I've just added new issue about this:
https://hub.qgis.org/issues/9880
Regards
-
Piotr Pociask
GIS Support sp. z o. o.
http://www.gis-support.pl/
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Wrong-feature-order-after-commiting-changes-tp5130555p5131139.html
Sent
Hi again !
*Bernhard Ströbl* :
- wouldn't it be more intuitive to left click on an icon (which would then
open the layer settings with the appropriate section). Right clicking in
the way you describe could be implemented additionally.
I think the left click on an icon could simply toggle the
Hi Piotr,
The order comes from the provider, in this case it's ogr. We don't/can not
control the order in qgis.
Nathan
On 26/03/2014 6:29 pm, Piotr Pociask p0c...@o2.pl wrote:
I've just added new issue about this:
https://hub.qgis.org/issues/9880
Regards
-
Piotr Pociask
GIS
Am 26.03.2014, 01:07 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Dalang
olivier.dal...@gmail.com:
Nice mockup Oliver!
I like the idea of putting the tag icons after another vertical bar
since I hope that it would look cleaner if the icons are aligned.
Looking forward to the discussion.
Best wishes,
Anita
--
Am 26.03.2014, 08:26 Uhr, schrieb HAUBOURG
regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr:
+1 with Nyall,
Labeling solution is probably the right one
+1 The labeling solution (with the small icon to the right of every
setting that can be controlled) is much better than the current
button+dialog
Hi all
This discussion is very interesting indeed. I am thinking about some
features we already talked about in the past and which could be great to
have (but which can be antinomic...)
* let the user choose an image for the legend instead of the QGIS image.
SVG would be the best format for
) no features in current map extent
best regards
Bernhard
__ Information from ESET Security, version of virus signature database
9595 (20140326) __
The message was checked by ESET Security.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
___
Qgis
Hi all,
thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is
a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible
inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should
use Processing tracker.
Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always
restore
Am 26.03.2014, 10:06 Uhr, schrieb Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at:
Am 26.03.2014, 08:26 Uhr, schrieb HAUBOURG
regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr:
+1 with Nyall,
Labeling solution is probably the right one
+1 The labeling solution (with the small icon to the right of every
setting that
Plugin Test 55 - Do not install approval by borysiasty.
The plugin version [486] Test 55 - Do not install 0.1 Experimental is now
unapproved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/test55/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Plugin Test 55 - Do not install unapproval by borysiasty.
The plugin version [486] Test 55 - Do not install 0.2 Experimental is now
unapproved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/test55/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Great, thanks Alex.
I see a minor issue: users who are not aware of the Processing tracker will
probably open tickets in the main tracker with the general category
Processing/Sextante and won't be able to specify which is the affected
backend (the Processing bug tracker has a subcategory for each
Plugin Test 56 - Do not install unapproval by borysiasty.
The plugin version [487] Test 56 - Do not install 1.0 Experimental is now
unapproved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/test56/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Plugin Test 56 - Do not install unapproval by borysiasty.
The plugin version [487] Test 56 - Do not install 2.0 Experimental is now
unapproved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/test56/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Category in main QGIS tracker should be removed and all tickets
moved into Processing subproject.
2014-03-26 11:46 GMT+02:00 Filipe Dias filipesd...@gmail.com:
Great, thanks Alex.
I see a minor issue: users who are not aware of the Processing tracker will
probably open tickets in the main
Am 25.03.2014, 22:33 Uhr, schrieb Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com:
I think the ultimate solution would be to port the data defined gui
control which is used in the labelling settings over to symbology.
Larry's done a great job with this control and it's behaves very
nicely - it's much
Il 25/03/2014 20:32, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
I'm giving a quick look into the gsoc
PR https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Django/pull/11
Frankly speaking it's a very good student exercise, but I dont' think
it's production ready.
It's missing basic validation, unique constraints, i18n
Plugin opeNoise approval by pcav.
The plugin version [480] opeNoise 0.1 Experimental is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/opeNoise/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Hi all.
Can we meet for a quick discussion about QGIS User Groups?
I suggest h 1530 here at the Code Sprint.
I think Andreas and Anita should be present, anyone is most welcome,
either in person or through IRC.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS PostGIS courses:
Am 26.03.2014, 10:31 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Bruy
alexander.b...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is
a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible
inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should
use Processing tracker.
Hello all,
before issuing a feature request, I would like to know if QGIS 2.2
offers the possibility of having a default format for bitmap output in
composer.
So far, offered formats are alphabetically ordered and, everytime you
save a composition to bitmap, you have to choose through all the
Am 26.03.2014, 11:19 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Hi all.
Can we meet for a quick discussion about QGIS User Groups?
I suggest h 1530 here at the Code Sprint.
Ok.
I think Andreas and Anita should be present, anyone is most welcome,
either in person or through IRC.
Maybe someone with admin rights can fix this?
2014-03-26 12:27 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at:
Am 26.03.2014, 10:31 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is
a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets
Is it possible to share results somewhere for those who interested,
but can't attend in person? For example I was thinking about
establishing QUG here in Ukraine
2014-03-26 12:29 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at:
Am 26.03.2014, 11:19 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il 26/03/2014 11:34, Alexander Bruy ha scritto:
Is it possible to share results somewhere for those who interested,
but can't attend in person? For example I was thinking about
establishing QUG here in Ukraine
definitely: the aim of the meeting is to provide hints and help for
upcoming QUGs
If
Hi Scott,
I have opened a pull request
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1266
I hope somemone can review it
Le 24/03/2014 19:28, Scott Clark a écrit :
Excellent news and many thanks!
René-Luc D'Hont wrote:
Hi Scott,
I have discovered this issue next week and I'm working on a bugfix.
I
Hi devs,
I have opened a pull request to fix the bug #9234 - WFS client doesn't
expose Header Authorization.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1266
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9234
Like for the others OGC providers: WMS and WCS, the user can set the
login and password to access to WFS
Il 26/03/2014 12:01, rldhont ha scritto:
I would like to see this fix backported so that we don't have to wait 4
months before we can use QGIS to edit data through WFS with authorization.
sounds reasonable, +1 for me.
please help us desing a workflow where we can prevent this nasty bugs
Hi Paolo,
I think we could not prevent them but we could release a bugfix version.
all the best
Le 26/03/2014 12:06, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Il 26/03/2014 12:01, rldhont ha scritto:
I would like to see this fix backported so that we don't have to wait 4
months before we can use QGIS to
Hi,
we are finally deploying the new plugins webiste.
During the next few hours we will make the switch.
Please do not make any change or upload new plugins until the switch is
completed or your modifications will be lost.
Thanks!
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it
Hi Larry
just a quick thumbs up - it looks very good - looking forward to
finding some time and trying it out!
Regards
Martin
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com wrote:
Hi,
I've mostly finished the labeling unit test framework (at least for *nix).
You can
Thanks Nathan,
But this behavior is also present in SpatiaLite and Memory Layers which
AFAIK are different providers than OGR. I also try to test postgres provider
in home.
Regards
Piotr
-
Piotr Pociask
GIS Support sp. z o. o.
http://www.gis-support.pl/
--
View this message in context:
Hi all.
Just to let everybody know: I'm going on testing and approving plugins.
This is my workflow:
* check that a link is present for main info (code repo, bugtracker,
home page)
* check that the links are correct
* if not, write the author
* check that the plugin has nothing unusual (e.g. we
Il 26/03/2014 11:19, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Hi all.
Can we meet for a quick discussion about QGIS User Groups?
I suggest h 1530 here at the Code Sprint.
I think Andreas and Anita should be present, anyone is most welcome,
either in person or through IRC.
in 5 minutes, room sextant and
Hi Alessandro,
Thanks for switching! So good to have the new site online!
Whom can I talk to about some fine tuning of the style, e.g. the headers
in the left side bar which are currently still using images from the old
design.
Best wishes,
Anita
--
anitagraser.com
That's because it's a subproject of QGIS-Application
I don't think it can be in 2 places at once, so not sure on the solution
here.
Thanks,
Alex
On 03/26/2014 03:31 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote:
Maybe someone with admin rights can fix this?
2014-03-26 12:27 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser
I've been seeing reports that the plugins.xml is slow
http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/plugins.xml
I know there is work to move this to the Docker hosting.
But I had another idea. I'm assuming that it's currently generated out
of Django. I think we need to find a way to put a cache in place to
Hi Alessandro,
just found minor cosmetic issue. When I use About plugins link in
top menu, browser title changes to QGIS - -. Same for Planet and
User map. Only for Plugins item correct title shown:
QGIS - Python Plugins Repository.
2014-03-26 17:41 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at:
Hi
So Nathan noticed the website wasn't coming up. Specifically
The requested URL /en/site/ was not found on this server.
I believe the issue is disk space. I'm guessing the sphinx is built
elsewhere and transferred in on a schedule without checking how much
space is left on the server. I got to
42 matches
Mail list logo
