SAGA execution console output
Error: Grid file could not be opened.
Error: input file
[/tmp/processing/590b940599c64f3ab5054d672a250297/dtm.sgrd]
Error: Elevation
# ## ###
### ### ## ###
### # ## ## # ##
### # ###
Hi Matteo,
I thing the problem is that GROUP BY is not supported on shapefile
format.
Il 16/01/2015 12.08, Matteo Ghetta ha scritto:
mmm I made some attempts but always the same parsing error..
so, you are saying that the error in Processing is related to the
GEOMETRY column right?
in the
Many thanks for all the answers !
The new version (2.6) is way more stable than 2.3 regarding postgis table.
I'll do some torture test and submit tickets if I find any problem.
Cheers,
Rémi-C
2015-01-19 13:31 GMT+01:00 George Silva georger.si...@gmail.com:
I also have a lot of experience with a
Hi Larry,
Sorry - I can't comment on a technical level.
But as a user I very much welcome such a safe password/connection
storage combined with a password manager. I bothered me a lot to see
passwords when hovering a layer in the layer manager, and to see the
plain text connection info in
Hi Matteo,
On Tue, 20. Jan 2015 at 09:47:50 +0100, Matteo Ghetta wrote:
yes, the column is ID.
Meaning that ID is the only column in au? Did you try to use ID instead of *?
On Fri, 16. Jan 2015 at 10:48:16 +0100, Matteo Ghetta wrote:
GDAL execution console output
ERROR 1: SQL
Hi Rémi,
Good to hear. Note that 2.3 was the dev version and not the stable
version. 2.4 was stable, then 2.6, 2.8, etc.
Andreas
On 20.01.2015 09:36, Rémi Cura wrote:
Many thanks for all the answers !
The new version (2.6) is way more stable than 2.3 regarding postgis table.
I'll do some
Hi Jürgen,
yes, the column is ID.
BTW, if I import the shapefile in SpatiaLite (or PostGIS) through DB
Manager the same query works and I can easily load the file in QGIS.
Maybe GROUP BY function is not supported in Processing yet?
Thanks
Matteo
___
Hi Matteo,
On Fri, 16. Jan 2015 at 10:48:16 +0100, Matteo Ghetta wrote:
I'm trying to run the Processing Execute SQL algorithm with super simple
following query:
select * from au where ID 100 group by ID
Um, is ID the only column? Otherwise I'd expect that it needs to be
(as it would be
True, I was confusing versions. The normal syntax does not work with 2.1.4.
This is weird, because you need to indicate the algorithm to use...so
without that 0 it shouldn't work. Another one of this annoying SAGA
mysteries
I will fix that call to gdal_io. Other modules, however, seems to
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
Sorry - I can't comment on a technical level.
But as a user I very much welcome such a safe password/connection storage
+1 fully agree with Andreas.
Best wishes,
Anita
___
Il 20/01/2015 12:38, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
What legal issues?
AFAIK storing locally data from Google and others breaks the licence.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
Il 20/01/2015 10:44, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto:
it fails before, when it imports the raster with io_gdal
it is supposed to pass a 0 argument to io_gdal to say you want ot
import a raster, but apparently in SAGA 2.1.4 (at least under Linux)
using it causes an error.
pretty serious bug,
No problem. Actually, that None version shouldn't appear, i ahve
added a small fix to improve that version detection
The error you are getting seems to be caused by SAGA believing that a
layer is already exported, so it is not calling the export routines
before calling the algorithm itself. I had
On 19/01/2015 21:04, Anita Graser wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Mora
vincent.m...@oslandia.com wrote:
The changes are illustrated in the attached files.
Thanks a lot for the mockups!
I don't have the Continuous size assistant right now, but it will be a
Il 20/01/2015 12:31, Anita Graser ha scritto:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
Sorry - I can't comment on a technical level.
But as a user I very much welcome such a safe password/connection storage
+1 fully agree with Andreas.
same here
thanks
Paolo, Giovanni
I don't see the calls to io_gdal in the error trace, so i think it's
not being called.
In case it is not shown in the text that is pasted, and it is calling
it but failing, then the problem might be what Giovanni is mentioning
Actually, for 2.1.4, the SAGA connector uses the
Hi Paolo,
2015-01-20 12:26 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
* one (tile map scale) is queued just because of possible legal issues
of older versions (new ones are clean)
BTW do we have any guide regarding such issues? It seems that another
plugin, namely QuickMapServices also
Hi!
Basically I don't care about having plugins with legal issues.
The only question for me is, is QGIS as a Project liable for serving
this plugins in the official repository?
If we (as Project) can say: We are not responsible for any legality
issues our hosted plugins may cause I am ok with
I use QGIS 2.6.1
De : qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] De la part de Nejia Ben Nasr
Envoyé : mardi 20 janvier 2015 09:39
À : qgis-developer
Objet : [Qgis-developer] Problem when using spatial index
Hi all,
I load a shapefile, then I
Hi,
Nejia, what about the validity of the geometry of your features? You can check
with the tool in Vector menu Geometry tools check geometry validity
Envoyé depuis mon HTC
- Reply message -
De : Nejia Ben Nasr nejia.benn...@spaceyes3d.com
Pour : 'qgis-developer'
Hi all.
I just want to share the outcome of my, probably rather obscure, work on
the management of Python plugins.
We currently have a shorter than ever queue:
* 7 unapproved plugins
* of these, 3 are deprecated
* one (inasafe) is pending publication, upon request from the author
* one (tile map
No problem. Actually, that None version shouldn't appear, i ahve
added a small fix to improve that version detection
The error you are getting seems to be caused by SAGA believing that a
layer is already exported, so it is not calling the export routines
before calling the algorithm itself.
Il 20/01/2015 12:36, Alexander Bruy ha scritto:
BTW do we have any guide regarding such issues?
not that I know of, and frankly I do not think we have the resources to
do a legal analysis.
IMHO the responsibility should be left to the individual developer.
It seems that another
plugin,
What legal issues?
- Nathan
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 9:36 pm Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paolo,
2015-01-20 12:26 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
* one (tile map scale) is queued just because of possible legal issues
of older versions (new ones are clean)
Le mardi 20 janvier 2015 10:40:05, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit :
Hi Matteo,
On Tue, 20. Jan 2015 at 09:47:50 +0100, Matteo Ghetta wrote:
yes, the column is ID.
Meaning that ID is the only column in au? Did you try to use ID instead of
*?
On Fri, 16. Jan 2015 at 10:48:16 +0100, Matteo
Good to know.
I faced this postgis issue since 1.8
It would be a tremendous improve to have it solved in 2.6 (checking)
Cheers,
Rémi-C
2015-01-20 9:46 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net:
Hi Rémi,
Good to hear. Note that 2.3 was the dev version and not the stable
version. 2.4 was
2015-01-20 12:43 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il 20/01/2015 12:38, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
What legal issues?
AFAIK storing locally data from Google and others breaks the licence.
All the best.
Using my GeoCoding[1] plugin with Google's geocoding API also doesn't
2015-01-20 14:25 GMT+01:00 Matthias Kuhn matth...@opengis.ch:
Hi,
I don't think it is possible for us to set up the structures to prevent
this from happening.
Once we gain knowledge of such a situation, I think that we are obliged
to remove these from the repository as we cannot promote TOS
Hi all,
is SPIT plugin still functional? Still useful?
AFAIK its main advantage is the possibility of importing multiple files
(but a Processing module is now available for this), and speed.
IMHO this is a good time to evaluate whether we want to drop some parts.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini
Hi,
I don't think it is possible for us to set up the structures to prevent
this from happening.
Once we gain knowledge of such a situation, I think that we are obliged
to remove these from the repository as we cannot promote TOS conflicts
as a project.
There would of course still be an option
Il 20/01/2015 14:37, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
I might be wrong but I don't feel that publishing a tool which is
theoretically capable to break the TOS is like effectively doing it.
good point; perhaps we could ask Google directly?
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS PostGIS
Anyone have any ideas on who a good person to review this kind of code?
- Nathan
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have drafted a QEP [0] for the introduction of a new authentication
configuration system that is protected with a master
Informal contacts are always good.
But I wouldn't start to establish contacts with Google based on a legal
issue. Imagine if you were a Google employee and QGIS would get in
contact with you for the first time, and the first question is if QGIS
could use their geodata tiles - which is more a
Hi Joseph
If you just want to highlight a particular feature, you do not need to use
the identify tool. The following code will load a feature and highlight it
in canvas. It should work if you try it in QGIS python console.
l = iface.activeLayer() # your layer
fid = 10 # your feature id
Hi,
One lead is Ed Parsons: http://www.edparsons.com/ He was a keynote
speaker at our Graphical Web conference:
http://www.graphicalweb.org/2014/#presentation_42 - as far as I know he
also attended Foss4G in Portland.
However, in my opinion, we should first establish the QGIS association
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
Il 20/01/2015 14:37, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
I might be wrong but I don't feel that publishing a tool which is
theoretically capable to break the TOS is like effectively doing it.
good point; perhaps we
Il 20/01/2015 16:42, Anita Graser ha scritto:
Wasn't there a plan to use some good connection to Google (they use
QGIS themselves after all) to finally get an official OK for the
OpenLayers plugin use case?
If we do not have more direct contacts, we could ask ujaval, author of a
plugin, and
Hi,
As I said on the user list ( thread : Import (not so) large data into a
remote postgis database ), SPIT has the advantage of showing a progress
bar.
This is a good feature when uploading data through a slow connection (my
case these days).
But I think it would make sense to move this feature
Oops I forgot the link to the branch with the small update on the db
manager :
https://github.com/olivierdalang/QGIS/tree/db_manager_dialog_on_import
2015-01-20 17:59 GMT+00:00 Olivier Dalang olivier.dal...@gmail.com:
Hi,
As I said on the user list ( thread : Import (not so) large data into a
Heh didn't know about this !! Great news, I'll try ASAP !
Actually I didn't see it because it wasn't displaying in my processing
toolbox, since I had an old processing plugin installed (v 2.2) that was
hiding the newer one which is now shipped with QGIS.
Shouldn't we remove the old processing
Hi,
As I said on the user list ( thread : Import (not so) large data into a
remote postgis database ), SPIT has the advantage of showing a progress
bar.
This is a good feature when uploading data through a slow connection (my
case these days).
But I think it would make sense to move this
Hi Vincent
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Mora
vincent.m...@oslandia.com wrote:
On 19/01/2015 21:04, Anita Graser wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Mora
The dialog will propose some buttons to
auto-set the function parameters (minValue and maxValue) by analyzing the
Hi Régis,
Thanks a lot for all the details!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Régis Haubourg
regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr wrote:
- use data defined widget used in labeling windows in symbology screens.
This will be more consistent and was discussed previously on the list. I
found some
Hi Régis,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Régis Haubourg
regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr wrote:
Hi Larry, very interesting QEP!
I'm not an expert of authentification systems at all. Here, I would love to
have QGIS be able to auto identify itself using Windows session user
information.
On 20 January 2015 at 09:22, Tim Sutton t...@kartoza.com wrote:
Hi All
@nyall - just referring back to your original part of this thread - could
you please describe for us your preferred scenario with regards to Composer
- Layout refactor and how it would relate to a LTR? For example would
Il 21/01/2015 01:38, Olivier Dalang ha scritto:
Shouldn't we remove the old processing plugin from the repo ? (or at
least set it's max version to the version where Processing was included
in QGIS ?)
Agreed, this is a common problem for many users.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini -
Hi,
I've gone through the recommended process
(http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://raw.github.com/qgis/QGIS/master/doc/INSTALL.html)
I had a problem with Grass, but set with grass in ccmake to No and that
solved that (for now).
After firing up QGIS, I get the dreaded Couldn't load PyQGIS
Il 20/01/2015 22:27, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto:
since we have this
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1674
I really think that SPIT can be dismissed.
This new tool is much faster than any other option available in QGIS,
and it has a lot of options. And of course it can be run in batch
On 01/20/2015 02:37 PM, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
2015-01-20 14:25 GMT+01:00 Matthias Kuhn matth...@opengis.ch:
I might be wrong but I don't feel that publishing a tool which is
theoretically capable to break the TOS is like effectively doing it.
Neither do I. As long as it is not promoting
49 matches
Mail list logo
