Re: [Qgis-developer] Is there a QGIS 2.99.0 plugin repositoryr for Qt5.7 and Python3 Ubuntu 16.04 xenial 64-bit?

Hi, Thanks for raising this. I don't think we need a special URL. 1. First all plugins should have maxVersion set to 2.98 by default. 2. Then plugins with metedata having maxVersion >= 3.0 or minVersion >= 3.0 would be listed. Can someone take care of point 1? Denis On 10/25/2016 03:02 AM,

Re: [Qgis-developer] master_2 branch to be removed ?

Il 24/10/2016 22:15, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > +1. It's confusing since people are opening PRs against master_2 when as > far as I know this branch is a dead end. It makes sense to me. Any reason not to close it immediately? Also, I'd close commits for 2.16, and mark is as unmaintained. Keeping

[Qgis-developer] Is there a QGIS 2.99.0 plugin repositoryr for Qt5.7 and Python3 Ubuntu 16.04 xenial 64-bit?

What is the URL? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QgsRasterChecker: symbol already defined

On 25 October 2016 at 02:07, René-Luc Dhont wrote: > Hi devs, > > Here is the error when I build QGIS master: > > /tmp/cc5lvdMz.s:985: Error: symbol « > _ZZZN16QgsRasterChecker10compareRowERK7QStringS2_S2_RS0_bS2_S2_Ed_NKUlvE_clEvE15qstring_literal > » is already defined >

Re: [Qgis-developer] master_2 branch to be removed ?

On 24 Oct 2016 10:35 PM, "Sandro Santilli" wrote: > > Now that 2.18 is out and its release-2_18 branch was created, > and given the decision for 2.18 to be the last release in > the 2.x series, should the "master_2" be removed ? +1. It's confusing since people are opening PRs

Re: [Qgis-developer] Broken Link to 2.18 Visual Change Log

On 24-10-16 19:42, C Hamilton wrote: > I don't know if this has been reported yet or not but the link to the > visual change log on the qgis.org front page returns a > 404 error. > > http://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog218/index.html Mmm, as part of making the

[Qgis-developer] Broken Link to 2.18 Visual Change Log

I don't know if this has been reported yet or not but the link to the visual change log on the qgis.org front page returns a 404 error. http://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog218/index.html Calvin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list

[Qgis-developer] QgsRasterChecker: symbol already defined

Hi devs, Here is the error when I build QGIS master: /tmp/cc5lvdMz.s:985: Error: symbol « _ZZZN16QgsRasterChecker10compareRowERK7QStringS2_S2_RS0_bS2_S2_Ed_NKUlvE_clEvE15qstring_literal » is already defined /tmp/cc5lvdMz.s:1001: Error: symbol «

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing test coverage

Il 23/10/2016 19:15, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: > Il 23/10/2016 19:07, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto: >> Something like this? >> >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/tests/README.md > > Thanks Matthias. IMHO implementing a comprehensive set of tests is of > high

[Qgis-developer] master_2 branch to be removed ?

Now that 2.18 is out and its release-2_18 branch was created, and given the decision for 2.18 to be the last release in the 2.x series, should the "master_2" be removed ? And maybe the roadmap table [1] should be updated to add 3.0 release ? [1]

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 2.18 for Windows unavailable for download?

Hi Casper, On Mon, 24. Oct 2016 at 12:07:31 +, Casper Børgesen (CABO) wrote: > Hi Nathan, yes, it is working now! Thanks to the fairy ☺ You're welcome. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 2.18 for Windows unavailable for download?

Hi Nathan, yes, it is working now! Thanks to the fairy ☺ /Casper From: Nathan Woodrow [mailto:madman...@gmail.com] Sent: 24. oktober 2016 12:58 To: Casper Børgesen (CABO) Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 2.18 for Windows unavailable for download? Hey, They

Re: [Qgis-developer] Yet again: SAGA 2.3.1 fails

Hi, > Il 24/10/2016 10:32, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto: > >> attached). I have used it a few times in the past to change/create the >> descriptions files when a new SAGA version was published. > > could you please do a PR instead of keeping them local? the script? weird, I'm pretty sure I got it

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 2.18 for Windows unavailable for download?

Hey, They look like they are there now. [image: Inline image 1] Regards, Nathan On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO) wrote: > Hi, > > > > The QGIS website displays the new release of QGIS 2.18 as available for > download, but both the Windows x86 and the x64

Re: [Qgis-developer] Download of QGIS 2.18 Windows 64 bit does not work ?

try this for now, till they fix it http://www.norbit.de/~jef/QGIS-OSGeo4W-2.18.0-1-Setup-x86_64.exe On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Geo DrinX wrote: > also 32 bit does not work. > > 2016-10-24 10:56 GMT+02:00 Geo DrinX : > >> Not Found >> >> The

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing test coverage

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Something like this? > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/tests/README.md Thanks, I've linked that file from tests/README.md in commit 31cd7a81a3434e159920bd9ce40817ffcc40144a (master only). Any

Re: [Qgis-developer] Retire dxf2shp for 3.0?

On 24 October 2016 at 18:37, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > Hi Nyall, thanks for raising this issue. > >> Hi all, >> >> Just wondering - can we remove the dxf2shp convertor core c++ plugin >> for 3.0? Here my rationale: >> >> - dxf works without converting >> - no one is

[Qgis-developer] QGIS 2.18 for Windows unavailable for download?

Hi, The QGIS website displays the new release of QGIS 2.18 as available for download, but both the Windows x86 and the x64 files are not found. LTS versions seems available. I couldn't see any notice on the list, so here is my notice :) Regards, Casper

Re: [Qgis-developer] Download of QGIS 2.18 Windows 64 bit does not work ?

also 32 bit does not work. 2016-10-24 10:56 GMT+02:00 Geo DrinX : > Not Found > > The requested URL /downloads/QGIS-OSGeo4W-2.18.0-1-Setup-x86_64.exe was > not found on this server. > ___ Qgis-developer mailing list

[Qgis-developer] Download of QGIS 2.18 Windows 64 bit does not work ?

Not Found The requested URL /downloads/QGIS-OSGeo4W-2.18.0-1-Setup-x86_64.exe was not found on this server. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe:

Re: [Qgis-developer] Fill nodata gdal tool in gdal-plugin using Leveller as outputformat

Hi, > Hi, > > I am trying to use the Fill nodata tool from the Raster menu (and so the > gdal-plugin) but it fails to use the default out format which seems to be > set to Leveller. Changing the code in the box to -of GTiff solves the > problem but I wonder why the Leveller format is not working.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Yet again: SAGA 2.3.1 fails

Il 24/10/2016 10:44, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto: > Mmm, I do not think Giovanni is to blame. sorry, too fast - I did not mean to blame Giovanni. > Better to use this script to create a test with earlier output as a > fixture to retest against? yes; in principle supporting saga 2.3 LTR

Re: [Qgis-developer] Retire dxf2shp for 3.0?

Hi Nyall, thanks for raising this issue. > Hi all, > > Just wondering - can we remove the dxf2shp convertor core c++ plugin > for 3.0? Here my rationale: > > - dxf works without converting > - no one is maintaining it > - conversion can be done using OGR itself > - doesn't really belong in QGIS >

Re: [Qgis-developer] Yet again: SAGA 2.3.1 fails

Il 24/10/2016 10:32, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto: > attached). I have used it a few times in the past to change/create the > descriptions files when a new SAGA version was published. could you please do a PR instead of keeping them local? Thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS &

Re: [Qgis-developer] Yet again: SAGA 2.3.1 fails

Hi, > Unknown option 'INTERPOL' The problem is already know, this parameter (in the io_gdal module, the one to import raster layers) has changed name in recent SAGA releases. This must be addressed also in SagaAlgorithm***.py Regarding all other changes/additions that could have been made too

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP: Project and Layer Registry Refactoring

Hi Mathieu On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > Will this facilitate an eventual (not part of your proposal/work) > multi-map-frame environment? Alvaro might have good considerations to offer > on that front. Multiple projects and multiple map

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP: Project and Layer Registry Refactoring

Nice! about multi-map-frame environment, I had not special problems with those static classes, but I am sure with Martin's proposal the code will get more clean. De: Mathieu Pellerin Para: Nathan Woodrow CC: qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP: Project and Layer Registry Refactoring

Nice. Glad this is moving forward. Will this facilitate an eventual (not part of your proposal/work) multi-map-frame environment? Alvaro might have good considerations to offer on that front. On Oct 24, 2016 2:01 PM, "Nathan Woodrow" wrote: > Nice!. This is very welcome.

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [598] Swap Vector Direction approval notification.

Plugin Swap Vector Direction approval by pcav. The plugin version "[598] Swap Vector Direction 0.7" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SwapVectorDirection/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [284] Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin approval notification.

Plugin Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin approval by pcav. The plugin version "[284] Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin 5.1.5" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SemiAutomaticClassificationPlugin/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list

[Qgis-developer] QEP: Project and Layer Registry Refactoring

Hi all Here is my proposal to disrupt the quiet waters of project and map layer registry classes: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/76 I should have time to work on the implementation during December... Hopefully this will provide a good building block for the rewrite