Hi Nyall and Johan,
Alexander Bruy had updated his SAGA provider for Processing to SAGA 7.3.0
already, so it is the best candidate to be merged to core! :)
https://plugins.bruy.me/processing-saga.html
Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio
Nyall Dawson escreveu no dia quinta, 1/08/2019
à(s) 23:23:
Hi Andreas.
I'm now travelling. Should I also fill the form, or I'm in by default?
Cheers.
On 2 August 2019 15:31:15 CEST, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>Hi QGIS contributors,
>
>Just a gentle reminder that if you want to request travel support for
>the Bukarest meeting, that you should please fill in
Hi QGIS contributors,
Just a gentle reminder that if you want to request travel support for
the Bukarest meeting, that you should please fill in the form at
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSea25C7UMQecQgEIIpZGHdwpqqFy6ZTEfOk64qcA0tI4aZZFA/viewform
Also, don't forget to register
Just an update:
If I use a rule name instead of the SLD, it works fine without the
margins, with the exact same parameters.
So it seems to be a bug when an SLD is provided, that the dimensions of
the square are broken.
Here a request without an SLD but with a rule parameter:
Hi Matthias,
> One the first principles of every of our developers is to try to avoid
> regressions. Whenever a QGIS developer writes code or reviews code,
> there is this process in the back of the head going on thinking "could
> this cause side effects?". Most of the times we are quite
Hi,
> Until we have evidence that this argument is valid, I think it's
> actually causing much more harm to the community than good. (It can
> easily be mis-interpreted as "you wasted your time volunteering this
> contribution, you should have fixed #xyz instead.")
nobody should ever ever judge
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this up Nyall.
From my side, this survey would have had ticks in every of the
available options over time.
And I'd have mentioned in the "feedback" part of the survey that some
relevant information to answer the core question was missing because the
question only
Plugin CHM from LIDAR approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1730] CHM from LIDAR 0.8 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/chm_from_lidar-master/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List
Hi,
Sorry about the missing GetLegendGraphics image result. Here it should
be visible (hopefully):
Thanks,
Andreas
On 2019-08-02 12:08, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,
In QGIS server (various recent versions tested), I am struggling to get a proper single PNG image of a single category of
Hi,
In QGIS server (various recent versions tested), I am struggling to get
a proper single PNG image of a single category of a categorized renderer
Here is my request:
Matthias, you're raising a good point on the 2.0 vs 3.4 (I'd argue 2.18 vs
3.4 too). Sometimes we tend to get so "passionate" about specific bugs that
impact our own workflows that we end up not seeing the forest for the
trees. 3.4 LTS is overall a much, much more solid product than 2.18 was and
Hello list,
Some more thoughts on this topic, because it comes up repeatedly.
One the first principles of every of our developers is to try to avoid
regressions. Whenever a QGIS developer writes code or reviews code,
there is this process in the back of the head going on thinking "could
this
Hi
Wow yay! Thanks so much for the PG raster support Alessandro! Cant wait to
try it out!
Regards
Tim
> Also - just to point out - Alessandro implemented the feature request
> overnight. Big kudos to him -- we finally have a stable way of using
> PostGIS rasters in QGIS.*
>
>
Hi Matteo
On 8/2/19 7:15 AM, matteo wrote:
Hi,
Right -- but again, I see no concrete issues here. We have one issue
which isn't a regression (postgis rasters) and is instead a feature
request, and one regression which was caused by an important fix
(broken grass for Windows non-English
14 matches
Mail list logo
