On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 7:40 AM Luca Manganelli <
luca.mangane...@comune.trento.it> wrote:
> Il giorno gio 2 lug 2020 alle ore 16:19 Alessandro Pasotti <
> apaso...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > here is a link to the presentation:
> >
> > http://www.itopen.it/bulk/QGIS/QGIS-Server-Meeting-Jun-2020/
>
Il giorno gio 2 lug 2020 alle ore 16:19 Alessandro Pasotti <
apaso...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> here is a link to the presentation:
>
> http://www.itopen.it/bulk/QGIS/QGIS-Server-Meeting-Jun-2020/
Thank you! I've read a note:
"We should also have the desktop UI more easy to configure for "fast
Nice job! You are really fast in coding :-)
Il giorno dom 5 lug 2020 alle ore 15:08 BELGACEM NEDJIMA
ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> During the fifth week of the summer of code I made a lot of progress
> implementing the 3D scenes export feature. Here is my report for the week:
>
>
>-
>- Tasks
Il giorno lun 6 lug 2020 alle ore 00:44 Nyall Dawson
ha scritto:
> 5. We waited far too long to move to Qt 5. (it was around the ~Qt
> 5.7/5.8 release before we jumped). We risked being kicked out of
> debian because of our much delayed transition. We also had a period of
> many many years before
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your hard work here!
> 2) Tasked Charles to read each PR that has a ‘Feature’ label as it comes in
> and in the comments section, nudge the author if the description is not clear
> / well described. Would be grateful if the PR gatekeepers could hold back on
> merging
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 07:21, Tim Sutton wrote:
> For the macOS side of this, I wonder if things are quite so urgent. I think
> the first ARM (‘Apple Silicon’) based machines are going to be out this year,
> but it will be a two years before their product line is fully transitioned.
> macOS
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 23:21, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Another thought is the spectre of "long term stable" OS releases.
>
> In various projects, I run into people who choose to run old software
> (otherwise known as "using a LTS distribution"), but at the same time
> insist on compiling the most
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 22:38, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Bo Victor Thomsen writes:
>
> > 3. I like the idea, that you can build QGIS with both the QT ver 5.x
> >and QT ver 6.x in a (limited) time period. That gives the plugin
> >developer some peace of mind, having both the "old" and the
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 19:18, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall,
>
> Having a clear plan in time for Qt6 is important. Thanks.
>
> Some questions:
>
> - Is there any plan regarding the todos for QGIS 4?
We would leave these until QGIS 4.0, maybe in 2-3 years.
> - Do we also remove/cleanup
Hi all,
A dedicated logo and a dedicated landing page would be great (we could
use server.qgis.org for example). Part of QGIS Server "identity" problem
is because people think it as some QGIS additional feature. Not as
something that can be deployed in a headless server, independently of
QGIS. In
Hi
> On 5 Jul 2020, at 23:44, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> 3. We have some big hurdles approaching on which we'll be completely
> dependent on upstream Qt. Probably the most important of these being
> Apple's move to their own CPU architecture. If we don't move to Qt
> 6.0, then QGIS is DOA when
Hi
> On 5 Jul 2020, at 23:51, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure there's anything we can do here. That said, one
> experiment I played with about a year ago was to upgrade the symbol
> preview picture to use a QgsMapCanvas widget. The symbol is then
> rendered using a geometry of suitable
Hi all,
I agree the QGIS server deserves its own "document" in QGIS docs.
I Wouldn't mind assisting with that. Always a good opportunity to learn
more about it.
Best regards,
Alexandre
A segunda, 6/07/2020, 15:36, Julien Cabieces
escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > During our recent meeting
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. And thanks for confirming that you also noticed
this issue and have an explanation for what's the cause. Glad that I'm
not the only one who got annoyed by this ...
In that case - can we do something about the second issue - that larger
symbols always appears as
Hi all,
I'm getting some messages from the log file I do'nt understand[0]
I couldn't find an explanation in the manual. Does anybody have some hints?
Thanks in advance.
---
[0]
Application path not initialized
QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to
'/tmp/runtime-www-data'
...
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> During our recent meeting about QGIS Server it was pointed out that
> QGIS Server does not have all the visibility that it deserves.
>
> One of the possible actions is to move the server documentation to its
> own independent chapter.
>
+1
> The server documentation is now
Hello,
> One of the possible actions is to move the server documentation to its own
> independent chapter.
+1
We could also think about a dedicated QGIS Server logo. What do you think?
Regards.
Le lun. 6 juil. 2020 à 10:37, Alessandro Pasotti a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> During our recent meeting
Another thought is the spectre of "long term stable" OS releases.
In various projects, I run into people who choose to run old software
(otherwise known as "using a LTS distribution"), but at the same time
insist on compiling the most recent release of X, and they expect X to
build against old
On 7/6/20 2:36 PM, matteo wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> That is not 1 link because those options depend on the driver used...
>> (so I think the link should stay the same, but maybe the docs should state
>> that these custom options are very driver specific?)
>>
>> For example for geojson that would
Bo Victor Thomsen writes:
> 3. I like the idea, that you can build QGIS with both the QT ver 5.x
>and QT ver 6.x in a (limited) time period. That gives the plugin
>developer some peace of mind, having both the "old" and the "new"
>QGIS as a testing ground before plugin release
I
Hi Richard,
> That is not 1 link because those options depend on the driver used...
> (so I think the link should stay the same, but maybe the docs should state
> that these custom options are very driver specific?)
>
> For example for geojson that would be
>
>
Thank you for quick reaction :)
-
Piotr Pociask
GIS Support sp. z o. o.
http://www.gis-support.pl/
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List
On 7/6/20 11:07 AM, matteo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I cannot find related GDAL documentation for the "Custom Options" in the
> "Save Vector As.." dialog.
>
> Our documentation points to the main page of gdal.org, if somebody
> (Even? :) ) has some hints I'll update the upstream doc with a more
>
Plugin Seismic Positioning Data Importer approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2108] Seismic Positioning Data Importer 0.2" is now
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/seismic_importer/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Plugin Wtyczka GIS Support approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1954] Wtyczka GIS Support 1.5" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/gissupport_plugin/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin Seismic Positioning Data Importer approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2108] Seismic Positioning Data Importer 0.2" is now
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/seismic_importer/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Hi Everyone,
As Tim has mentioned I will be maintaining the changelog content going
forward and we have made some modifications to the workflow.
If anybody has any further questions, if you are not entirely sure how
these changes have been implemented or would like me to step through the
process
Hi
Over week ago we added niew version of our plugin Wtyczka GIS Support with
few bug fixes. But it's not still approved. Is there any reasons for this
delay? We don't have any information from admin that something is incorrect.
Regards
Piotr Pociask, GIS Support
(gissupport)
-
Piotr
Hi QGIS Devs and PSC
I just wanted to update you on some improvements we are making to the way the
changelog is managed. As you know each release it is a bit of a chore getting
the changelog into shape and out in a timely fashion. Most of the delays come
in the post-editing of content, trying
Hi Nyall,
Having a clear plan in time for Qt6 is important. Thanks.
Some questions:
- Is there any plan regarding the todos for QGIS 4?
- Do we also remove/cleanup our own deprecated methods, and if yes, when?
Thanks
Matthias
On 7/6/20 12:44 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
Hi lists,
I'd like
Hi all,
I cannot find related GDAL documentation for the "Custom Options" in the
"Save Vector As.." dialog.
Our documentation points to the main page of gdal.org, if somebody
(Even? :) ) has some hints I'll update the upstream doc with a more
specific link.
Cheers and thanks
Matteo
Hi,
During our recent meeting about QGIS Server it was pointed out that
QGIS Server does not have all the visibility that it deserves.
One of the possible actions is to move the server documentation to its
own independent chapter.
The server documentation is now mainly mainly buried deep under
From a plugin developer's viewpoint:
1. It's basically a good idea to keep supporting libraries (like qt)
up-to-date version wise. Not bleeding edge..
2. Pease make it a relatively smooth transition for plugin developers.
I still got scars on my back from the QGIS 2--> 3 transition
3. I
Plugin SPARQLing Unicorn QGIS Plugin approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1866] SPARQLing Unicorn QGIS Plugin 0.11 Experimental" is
now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/sparqlunicorn/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Plugin FeltTegn approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2109] FeltTegn 0.23.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/felt_tegn/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Hi Nyall,
your proposal sounds reasonable to me.
Do we have any information about the Qt6 adoption timeline from
distributions like debian or ubuntu?
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:44 AM Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> Hi lists,
>
> I'd like to raise a proposal which has been percolating away in the
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
