To transfer the repo i need permission to create new repos under that
org. If you can give me rights to do it, I will do the transfer and
then you can revoke them
Thanks
2017-05-22 10:22 GMT+02:00 Rashad Kanavath :
>
>
> You can transfer to orfeotoolbox. this is the
I agree 100% on what Alex said.
Rashad, instead of adding your user, can I completely move the
ownership to you or to another account that is managed by the OTB
team?
2017-05-17 11:18 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy :
> Hi Rashad,
>
> 2017-05-16 11:46 GMT+03:00 Rashad Kanavath
Hi Rashad,
2017-05-16 11:46 GMT+03:00 Rashad Kanavath :
> okay. current version needs update of lot of xml files, change in version
> number, list of application inside the otb plugin sources. I want to avoid
> that. And I think both OTB and QGIS developers will agree
On 16 May 2017 at 19:40, Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da
wrote:
> It's looking great :)
>
> Having processing algs run in the background will really improve the user
> experience IMO.
>
> Having the possibility to use expressions in order to define parameters
>
It's looking great :)
Having processing algs run in the background will really improve the user
experience IMO.
Having the possibility to use expressions in order to define parameters
dynamically is really awesome too! In your video demo you effectively
turned the fixed distance buffer algorithm
On 16 May 2017 at 18:16, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
>> Hello Paolo,
>>
>> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core part with
>> wrappers in python?
>
> core in C++, with Python bindings. Nyall can be more
Users of QGIS 2.x don't need separate plugin as OTB and all
other providers are part of Processing.
2017-05-16 11:16 GMT+03:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
>> Hello Paolo,
>>
>> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core
Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
> Hello Paolo,
>
> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core part with
> wrappers in python?
core in C++, with Python bindings. Nyall can be more precise on this.
> I am not clear on that. And this change will be for qgis3, users
Hi Alex,
Il 15/05/2017 13:19, Alexander Bruy ha scritto:
> I suggest not to rush with releasing and publishing any of the plugins.
> Please don't forget that QGIS 2.14, 2.16 and 2.18 still have all providers
> built in. For master I personally don't see any benefits in releasing
> Processing
Hi,
I suggest not to rush with releasing and publishing any of the plugins.
Please don't forget that QGIS 2.14, 2.16 and 2.18 still have all providers
built in. For master I personally don't see any benefits in releasing
Processing providers right now. These plugins will be broken most of the
Il 15/05/2017 10:53, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> The repo with the plugin already extracted and prepared is in here
>
> https://github.com/volaya/qgis-otb-plugin
Great, thanks Victor for the prompt reply.
As said, ready to help with publication and testing.
All the best.
--
Paolo
Hi
The repo with the plugin already extracted and prepared is in here
https://github.com/volaya/qgis-otb-plugin
IT hasn't been published in the plugin repo, though. I think the OTB
team was ready to take ownership, so if anyone tells me the user name
or group that will accept it, i will
Il 15/05/2017 10:24, Julien Michel ha scritto:
>> Rashad, would you be willing to take ownership of that plugin?
> I think OTB team as a whole would be glad to take ownership of that
> plugin. Then we could add updates of the plugin tour release process and
> ensure that it is always fresh and
Le 15/05/2017 à 10:21, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Il 15/05/2017 10:13, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
* create an independent provider (sub-plugin of Processing) for OTB
* publish it on the official repo.
Rashad, would you be willing to take ownership of that plugin?
I think OTB team as a whole
Il 15/05/2017 10:13, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
> I had done some work in fixing some qgis otb stuff but was not
> integrated yet. These enhancements will reduce some code and improve otb
> processing.
>
> We @CS had contacted Victor olaya regarding this in Jaunary 2017. He
> had informed us
Hi all,
a new major version of OTB has been released. In the meantime, the OTB
provider has been removed from Processing on master.
Does anyone have a plan to keep the (very important IMHO) QGIS-OTB
integration working?
I'm available for help if necessary.
All the best, and thanks.
--
Paolo
16 matches
Mail list logo