Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Devs, Here is a new feature for embbeding QGIS Server in Python application! https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5408 Etienne, you can probably used it in GeoNodes to dynamically build Web Services. Regards, René-Luc Le 03/10/2017 à 10:09, Etienne Trimaille a écrit : Hi devs, We would

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Anita Graser wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Tim Sutton wrote: > >> Hi Anita >> >> Are you going to put it on the QGIS blog? Could you share the draft then >> it is on WP so I can make some edits? >> > > S >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On 18-10-17 11:13, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > I think it is maybe best if we create a (translatable) rst page into the > web page with some more information about the tests, and add a link > there to the test.qgis.org site (and maybe to the 'latest'). Ok, done

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On 18-10-17 09:22, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi,  > in fact it is test.qgis.org with no "s". My bad, > sorry.   I added an ServerAlias now: so test and tests should work > Richard, what do you think of our proposal to add a subdirectory like > "http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite;

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Le mercredi 18 octobre 2017, 09:22:51 CEST Régis Haubourg a écrit : > Richard, what do you think of our proposal to add a subdirectory like " > http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite; ? In case we get one day other reports like > performance benchmark, that would avoid to have to move it afterwards.

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

I'd be very happy to help out with proofing the changelog - I don't think I know enough to help write it in the first place, but I'll happily fix some typos. Tom - Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon -- Sent from:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi, in fact it is test.qgis.org with no "s". My bad, sorry. Richard, what do you think of our proposal to add a subdirectory like " http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite; ? In case we get one day other reports like performance benchmark, that would avoid to have to move it afterwards. Tim, I'd be please

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

I will take part to the testing in the next days. i will ask my collegues at Gis3W to test it too, having a quite complex application (G3WSuite) built on QGIS Server 2.x giovanni Mail priva di

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Tim Sutton wrote: > Hi Anita > > Are you going to put it on the QGIS blog? Could you share the draft then > it is on WP so I can make some edits? > S ​ure, I'll do that in the evening. Regards, Anita​

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Anita Graser wrote: > - Remove all singleton calls > > > ​what are singleton calls? (could be explained in the web page, too) :-)​ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Anita, Maybe you could add a section about "testing wanted / needed" at the end of the blog post? I think after such a lot of refactoring, users can expect incompatibilities with the previous 2x version. Thats why a call for testing should be included. Otherwise existing QGIS server

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi > On 17 Oct 2017, at 23:30, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > On 18 October 2017 at 06:36, Anita Graser wrote: > > Nice work Anita! > >> - Build a OGC compliancy platform and integrate it to a continuous >> integration platform. Conformity reports are

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On 18 October 2017 at 06:36, Anita Graser wrote: Nice work Anita! > - Build a OGC compliancy platform and integrate it to a continuous > integration platform. Conformity reports are now pushed to tests.qgis.org For me tests.qgis.org just redirects to the homepage. Is this

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Anita, since today, qgis server reaches OGC compliancy for wms 1.3.0 on basic and queryable levels. We have a blog post ready for that. There are 5 tests missing for a full compliancy and we are just trying to evaluate how much work this is. We already could start a certification process in

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Anita Are you going to put it on the QGIS blog? Could you share the draft then it is on WP so I can make some edits? For now I also put your text as a placeholder in the changelog for 3.0 here changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.0.0/#qgis-server-overhaul

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

I've extended Régis' draft with some of the more recent information. Please let me know what you think. I'll try to publish in a couple of days. -- start -- *QGIS server refactoring is done!* As you may know, QGIS is jumping to a new major version (yes!). Doing so was made necessary because of

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

And I'm waiting to add WFS 1.1.0 support: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5297 Regards, René-Luc Le 13/10/2017 à 08:58, Régis Haubourg a écrit : Hi Anita, among the news, Paul is currently tackling OGC conformity issues. see : https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5044

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Anita, among the news, Paul is currently tackling OGC conformity issues. see : https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5044 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5084 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5145 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5150 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5157

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Thanks everyone so far! Please keep the info coming. I'll draft a blog post on the weekend. Regards, Anita On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > Hi Règis, > > thanks for the nice summary! > > Maybe it would be interesting for python devs to stress out

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Gesendet: Montag, 9. Oktober 2017 12:19 > An: Scholle, Burghardt (15-3 GIS) > Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > Betreff: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status > > Hi > > According to the source > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/src/s

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi According to the source https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/src/server/qgsserversettings.cpp#L47: setting QGIS_SERVER_PARALLEL_RENDERING to False or not setting QGIS_SERVER_PARALLEL_RENDERING is the same thing as the default value is 'false'. Using the appropriate log level you can

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi David, I will answer you directly and give you the desired information. I've done some tests with a sample application, which you can see under the URL https://lxgis1.stadt.wolfsburg.de/qgis_wcl/index.html. The map topic "Stadtplan" is based on the qgis server 2.14.19, the "Stadtplan

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi > On 05 Oct 2017, at 10:09, David Marteau wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the overview. > > We need more examples of embedding the server in python and I plan to publish > some concrete examples from our use cases asap. Thats great David! Looking forward to testing it

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi, Thanks for the overview. We need more examples of embedding the server in python and I plan to publish some concrete examples from our use cases asap. David M. > Le 5 oct. 2017 à 09:34, Alessandro Pasotti a écrit : > > Hi Règis, > > thanks for the nice summary! >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Règis, thanks for the nice summary! Maybe it would be interesting for python devs to stress out how QGIS server 3 brings the bindings and the plugins to a new level: while the original filter-style python plugins, are still available, the new service-oriented plugin-based architecture allows

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Well, from a user point of view, that's a bit hard since all this is 90 % refactoring.. which is supposed to be transparent for users. We have the trust and multithreaded features, that should (and early testers today found it slower today) and the ability to code new services using python. We

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Great overview, thanks for drafting Régis! Some additional ideas: Could we add a section with the key improvements from an user perspective? I'm particularly intrigued by the services / plugins part. Could you elaborate? Regards, Anita On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Régis Haubourg

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi again, here is my very first draft: Several images can be pulled from the joined slides given at Foss4G-EU here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzatQbprJ-hjWF95VzdHbGRsVEk/view?usp=sharing René-Luc, David, Paul, don't hesitate to amend that!

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi, Do we have metrics on this ? Does it mean that QGIS_SERVER_PARALLEL_RENDERING=False is also slower than previous version ? David M. > Le 4 oct. 2017 à 14:15, Matthias Kuhn a écrit : > > Hi, > > I had some questions from people interested in performance. > > I

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi > > Yes, refactoring is now complete! see : https://github.com/qgis/QGIS- > Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74#issuecomment-334123595 > > Anita, I'll draft an article tonight if you still agree to review it, that >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Matthias, in my tests that were made a few month ago, it was a lot faster on project load and a bit faster with parallel rendering for multi layer requests. Still I found it still slower than desktop rendering on the very same extent. I'm not aware of additional settings. We did not have the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi, I had some questions from people interested in performance. I advised them to set the following * QGIS_SERVER_PARALLEL_RENDERING=True * Trust project flag Apparently parallelized rendering works (system stats) but it was reported to be slower than older versions. Is there something else

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi, It seems that the QGIS refactoring is complete! https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74 https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/issues/57 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/4824 You can use QGIS Server like this in Python from qgis.server import QgsServer, QgsServerRequest,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Yes, refactoring is now complete! see : https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74#issuecomment-334123595 Anita, I'll draft an article tonight if you still agree to review it, that would be great! Régis 2017-10-03 14:25 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser : > > >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi Etienne, > > from my point of view, this is the perfect time to start stressing QGIS > server 3! We just discussed bout starting working with it this morning on a > new project. > > Maybe Alessandro and

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi Etienne, from my point of view, this is the perfect time to start stressing QGIS server 3! We just discussed bout starting working with it this morning on a new project. Maybe Alessandro and René-Luc can tell us more about the plugin side. Paul is currently fixing issues raised by the OGC

[QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server 3 status

Hi devs, We would like to start testing QGIS Server 3: OGC services and Python plugins. I think I read that the QGIS Server refactoring was finished and it seems that most of OGC tests are working: http://37.187.164.233/ogc/latest_wms_1_3_0.html Is it possible to have the status of QGIS Server