On 08/06/2015 15:46, Andreas Neumann wrote:
I agree - a rename to size assistant or sizing assistant would be
useful. In my opinion, the new solution is not harder to find than the
old solution - which was pretty hard to find and even more
disconnected to the actual symbol than the new
On 05/06/2015 16:46, Alexandre Neto wrote:
I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be working
as it should. Comparing a layer where the marker size is set to 50 and
another where we use 50 as an
Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Vincent Mora vincent.m...@oslandia.com
wrote:
Is the size-scale method set to Diameter ? If it's not the case (i.e.
scale method area), then a square root is applied if the size is defined by
an expression.
You are right, setting size-scale to
On Jun 8, 2015 10:03 AM, Vincent Mora vincent.m...@oslandia.com wrote:
On 05/06/2015 16:46, Alexandre Neto wrote:
I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be
working
as it should. Comparing a
I agree - a rename to size assistant or sizing assistant would be
useful. In my opinion, the new solution is not harder to find than the
old solution - which was pretty hard to find and even more disconnected
to the actual symbol than the new solution. I agree, it is still a bit
hidden, but it
Alexandre Neto wrote
Not sure if data-defined override for Symbol Size should even be connected
to the size-scale method, since in this case it should simply override the
symbol size value.
In master UI refactoring, area or diameter selector disappeared, and we now
have an assistant for that.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Neto senhor.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be working
as it should. Comparing a layer where the marker size is set to 50
I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be working
as it should. Comparing a layer where the marker size is set to 50 and
another where we use 50 as an expression in data-defined override, they do
not
