Re: [Qgis-developer] Status of Q3 migration?

Hi, I would also prefer a double dev cycle, followed by a double test period. So just shift the one month from the first dev cycle towards the end. In Bonn we discussed this and I think the double dev cycle was an option, but we said we would decide in December/January when we know more about

Re: [Qgis-developer] Proposal: Having all Processing providers as independent components

Hi Victor, Il 06/12/2016 07:33, Victor Olaya ha scritto: > Let me know what you think I like the idea of modularity. However, requiring the user to do extra steps to use GRASS, SAGA, GDAL/OGR, that are already shipped with our packages, seems a bit of hindrance. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini

[Qgis-developer] Proposal: Having all Processing providers as independent components

Hi all Before writing a QEP, I would like to discuss quickly here one idea about Processing, that I think could be interesting and feasible for 3.0 Currently, Processing has some “core” providers (those that are part of the Processing code itself and are installed with QGIS), ranging from basic

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [995] dzetsaka : Classification tool approval notification.

Plugin dzetsaka : Classification tool approval by pcav. The plugin version "[995] dzetsaka : Classification tool 2.1" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/dzetsaka/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List

Re: [Qgis-developer] Status of Q3 migration?

Hi all, Il 06/12/2016 00:02, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > Hmm I've brought up previously on the list my thoughts that we > should *extend* the timeline to mid next year, as opposed to speeding > it up. > > See https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-October/045554.html > > I'm

Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-psc] Task Manager has landed!

Hi Nyall Wow this is absolutely fantastic! Thanks so much for all your hard work! When you have all your social media bits ready let me know and I will make a blog post on http://blog.qgis.org - I think it is a really great demonstration of how we use the funds donated to QGIS for the good of

Re: [Qgis-developer] Status of Q3 migration?

On 3 December 2016 at 19:51, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Hi all, > I'm regularly compiling QGIS master, and I'm surprised how usable and > smooth it is - obviously not suitable for production, but apparently not > so far from it. It would be great if those more involved with

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing NG/V2 - brainstorming

On 6 December 2016 at 05:46, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Thanks for writing this up Nyall, > > This is something that I has been on my list of ideas for a long time > already and that I have never got round to get down to. > > I think you have covered the topic quite well already,

Re: [Qgis-developer] Add virtual layer equivalent in Processing

I think qgis-dev is now a zombie, as it's v2 master, where there has nor been any work for a while. - Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon -- View this message in context:

Re: [Qgis-developer] Any UI/UX plans for QGIS3?

I would really like an option to allow advanced users to manually just SET the extents of a vector layer when first adding it, so that a full table-scan can be avoided to derive that result. This still seems to happen, even though the “use estimated metadata” flag is checked, when first adding

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing NG/V2 - brainstorming

Thanks for writing this up Nyall, This is something that I has been on my list of ideas for a long time already and that I have never got round to get down to. I think you have covered the topic quite well already, so I don't think there's a lot I have to add right now. On 12/05/2016 06:41 PM,

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing NG/V2 - brainstorming

I really like the idea of having basic Processing code in the core library with Python bindings available. Regarding iterators approach... It sounds interesting, but we need to think also about possibility to work with layers, which are not loaded in QGIS. In this case as I understand we need to

Re: [Qgis-developer] Add virtual layer equivalent in Processing

Thanks Victor! On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Victor Olaya wrote: > Anita, Mathieu > > I added both of your requests and it should be possible now to use > tables on both "execute SQL" and "build virtual vector" algorithms > > Let me know if you try it (it is on master) >

[Qgis-developer] Geo-Information with QGIS

Dear all, The Faculty ITC [1] of the University of Twente, The Netherlands, is starting a 9 month distance course in Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (15 EC spread over a 9-month period) that can be taken solo or as a first step to a full MSc degree.. A decision was made to

Re: [Qgis-developer] Add virtual layer equivalent in Processing

Anita, Mathieu I added both of your requests and it should be possible now to use tables on both "execute SQL" and "build virtual vector" algorithms Let me know if you try it (it is on master) Cheers 2016-12-05 11:07 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Pellerin : > Victor, > > I was

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing NG/V2 - brainstorming

geo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer __ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature database 14553 (20161205) __ The message was checked by ESET Mail Se

Re: [Qgis-developer] Processing NG/V2 - brainstorming

Hi I would very much like to see improvements for Processing. A few additional ideas: - Display the number of features going through the model. This would help the user understand the data better. - Add comments to model components without opening each component. A chance to explain why a

Re: [Qgis-developer] The icon has Santa's cap ...

Klaus, You can see this post on how to replace them if you want. http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220138/removing-santa-hat-from-qgis-icon/220222#220222 Regards, Nathan On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Mithöfer wrote: > Dear group, > not everybody was happy

Re: [Qgis-developer] Add virtual layer equivalent in Processing

Victor, I was looking into this; it'd be nice for the "build vector layer" algorithm would support/show geometryless layers in the parametermultiinput panel. AFAIK, geometryless layers aren't (yet? :) ) supported by the parametermultiinput. Math On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Victor Olaya

Re: [Qgis-developer] The icon has Santa's cap ...

Dear group, not everybody was happy about it. We have cusumer who are a bit irritated asking where it suddenly came from (and what other changes were applied...). Regards, Klaus Am Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:10:12 +0100 schrieb Geo DrinX : > This morning, I had the surprise of see

[Qgis-developer] Processing NG/V2 - brainstorming

Hi all, I've recently been informally chatting about possible enhancements to processing with a few QGIS team members, and I thought it'd be worth starting a public brainstorm about these ideas. This is really just "thinking aloud" about what the next logical steps are for processing and how we

Re: [Qgis-developer] Task Manager has landed!

Nice! Definitely, a major step ahead, and will be very important for making Processing more responsive thanks for your great work! 2016-12-05 9:04 GMT+01:00 Nyall Dawson : > Hi all, > > Thanks to tons of valuable feedback from the QGIS community and the > generous

[Qgis-developer] Task Manager has landed!

Hi all, Thanks to tons of valuable feedback from the QGIS community and the generous funding grant from the QGIS organisation, I've just completed and merged the task manager framework branch. I'm very keen on feedback from QGIS devs, plugin authors, and users as they start the play with this