On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
Il 19/01/2014 17:30, Martin Dobias ha scritto:
We should probably agree on a policy about the right way of giving credit to
organizations that fund development. Recently in source code there I have
some
mentions of
Hi Radosław,
Things like this are most likely introduced by loosing the reference to
objects which then get garbage collected.
Try assigning the objects to local variables. I.e. change model to
self.model, filterModel to self.filterModel etc.
Hope this helps
Matthias
On Sun 19 Jan 2014
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm noticing an incredible slowdown (half an hour for doing *anything* on any
layer)
in master of a few days ago (5d4877a) for projects reading several PostGIS
remote
layers. The same project in 2.0.1 reads just fine.
Anyone confirms?
All
Hi Minoru,
All is OK, now.It was my local webbrowser test plugin, that
conflicted with your.
:)
Now, QGis2threejs works perfettly
Thank you
Roberto
2014/1/19 Geodrinx geodr...@gmail.com
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 19/gen/2014, alle ore 10:06, Minoru Akagi akagi...@gmail.com
ha
Hi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.itwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm noticing an incredible slowdown (half an hour for doing *anything* on
any layer)
in master of a few days ago (5d4877a) for projects reading several
Hi Paolo,
No problems for me today.
But I had troubles on Ubuntu with Postgis last weeks.
This was due to the introduction of geometry sinplification, but has
been solved for me since merge of pull 1053, 5days ago ( 8fb87f1 ).
Not sure if it has any relation, just FYI.
Cheers,
Denis
On
Server side simplification in the rendering options could
theoretically slow down a layer (e.g. if the server load is too high)
Matthias
On Mon 20 Jan 2014 09:50:46 AM CET, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Paolo Cavallini
cavall...@faunalia.it
First of all thanks for answering! I try to implement search that uses
existing layers! I try to do this looking at helloworld project, but
my first problem is that when I try to run helloworld.qgs form default
projects i cant see map and i am getting an error:
1. Resource interpreted as
Hi Olivier,
I don't work that much on Windows, so my experience may not cover all
cases.
In my experience, the easiest thing is to start the application from
VS. Do this, by right clicking the qgis project in the Solution
Explorer and click Set as StartUp project. Then click the play button
Hi Minoru,
I have some other suggestion :)
I am testing with more than one image and DTM files.
I find that, in this case, it would be useful to have an automatic selector
of the DTM or DSM layer (I don't know how, but, for example, it could be
the layer that starts with DTM_)
Other
This is my Apache log file:
[Mon Jan 20 12:59:28 2014] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] (OS 109)The pipe has
been ended. : mod_fcgid: get overlap result error
[Mon Jan 20 12:59:28 2014] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of
script headers: qgis_mapserv.fcgi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:36 AM,
Hi Minoru,
with last master version I had this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
C:\Users\rrr/.qgis2/python/plugins\Qgis2threejs\qgis2threejsdialog.py,
line 324, in run
htmlfilename = runSimple(htmlfilename, context, self.progress)
File
Hi,
If Martin's work is merged, I would vote for something like lightning,
or cheetah!
Cheetah sounds nice! what a nice splashscreen it would be ;)
Cheers,
Denis
On 20. 01. 14 15:41, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to remind everyone that the 2.1 development cycle ends on Friday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/01/2014 15:41, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
There's also the question how the next release should be named. My first idea
was Dufive, but I'm sure there are better ideas around. ;)
question: do we *really* need a name? I think the good old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/01/2014 15:51, Denis Rouzaud ha scritto:
Hi,
If Martin's work is merged, I would vote for something like lightning, or
cheetah!
Cheetah are classified as a vulnerable species:
http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/219/0
while we are
Hi dev,
Freeze starts on 2014-01-24, I have made a pull-request on the issue
#8298 http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8298
My solution is 5 codes lines, can someone review my code?
Thanks,
René-Luc
Le 10/01/2014 10:46, rldhont a écrit :
Hi all,
I made a pull request to fixed the issue #8298
Hello all,
RISE group has been developing a project named Clusterpy, which is a
library of spatially
constrained clustering algorithms. At RISE we would like to contribute to
QGIS with the
algorithms we have on our project and specially with the algorithms
proposed by the group and
group
Hi,
I am trying to create a custom application using QGIS API.
I am using Qt Creator and while running the app I get this error:
error while loading shared libraries: libqgis_core.so.2.1.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Here is the project file:
QT += core
Hi,
On Windows Hide deprecated does not seem to work. No matter if it's
ticked or not, the full list of transformations is displayed.
Do you confirm?
Anita
--
anitagraser.com
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/01/2014 15:51, Denis Rouzaud ha scritto:
Hi,
If Martin's work is merged, I would vote for something like lightning, or
cheetah!
Cheetah are classified as a vulnerable species:
http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/219/0
while we
Am 16.01.2014, 22:05 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
BTW, I think we should use the same selector throughout, e.g.
LayerNewNew shapefile
layer, New spatialite layer, Layer propertiesGeneral, etc.
+1 Have you opened a ticket yet?
Best wishes,
Anita
--
anitagraser.com
Hi,
I suggest to deactivate the Select datum transformations dialog by default.
Here is why:
- Most users are happy with the default transformations. (I assume that's
the case because it's not often a topic in the support channels.)
- It adds at least two more clicks for opening a layer (if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/01/2014 18:26, Anita Graser ha scritto:
Am 16.01.2014, 22:05 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
BTW, I think we should use the same selector throughout, e.g. LayerNewNew
shapefile
layer, New spatialite layer, Layer
Am 20.01.2014, 15:50 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
question: do we *really* need a name? I think the good old days of pets
planets are
gone, we can always have problem choosing a wrong name, and it will be
increasingly
difficult to find suitable ones.
Well, we still
Hi Anita,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi,
I suggest to deactivate the Select datum transformations dialog by default.
+1 for this. Also, the dialog's columns need better default widths (too
thin now), and a little text about what the dialog is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Today I cannot compile from master.
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b
returns:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/qgis/QGIS/debian/build'
perl -i -pe 's=#!/usr/bin/env python=#!/usr/bin/python2.7=;'
- -i used with no filenames on the
Am 20.01.2014, 18:39 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
+1 Have you opened a ticket yet?
Of course ;)
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9372
I added you as watcher, anything wrong with notifications?
Thanks! I guess I just missed the notification. They work. I got multiple
ones
Hi,
Regarding the name, we could also continue with other famous
cartographers - maybe someone from Latvia or England.
Andreas
Am 20.01.2014 18:48, schrieb Anita Graser:
Am 20.01.2014, 15:50 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
question: do we *really* need a name? I think the
How about Speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Speed
Goes well with MTR too :)
Cheers,
Saber
-Original Message-
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Neumann
Sent: 20 January 2014 19:07
To:
That's funny! Good catch.
Andreas
Am 20.01.2014 20:12, schrieb Saber Razmjooei:
How about Speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Speed
Goes well with MTR too :)
Cheers,
Saber
-Original Message-
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Ok I guess you can see where I am going to go with this email :-) Is there
any point to allowing users to simplify point layers? Alvaro, can your
remove the point rendering tab in layer properties (and I guess check
internally that you are not trying to simplify point layers)? Or is there a
use
On 01/20/2014 12:29 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
Ok I guess you can see where I am going to go with this email :-) Is there
any point to allowing users to simplify point layers? Alvaro, can your
remove the point rendering tab in layer properties (and I guess check
internally that you are not trying
Hi
Regarding whether we should keep giving releases names, I think we should
(big +1) for the following reasons:
* it (under our current scheme) pays homage to the hosts of our hackfests -
lets be honest there isn't much reward in hosting it other than seeing your
region represented in the
I fully support all of Tims arguments..
I'd like to keep it too and especially the point of refering .. I
hardly heard the release number but more the release name..
We still have some hackfests that did not get a name..
And for the future I'd suggest to name the release after a hackfest
after
Hello,
I'm working on a python plugin to render S57 nautical charts using the
ogr provider and QGis symbology. For now, I'm just testing how to use
Symbology, as I'm not familiar with it, so I think I do something wrong,
but can't find examples on Google.
I need to compose symbols for
Hello Devs!
I am trying to populate QgsAttributeTableView with some features that meet
a request in Python (QGIS-master).
My first try was to use
QgsAttributeTableModel.setRequest(QgsFeatureRequest) but it is not yet
implemented in Python bindings as I see in [1].
I would like to kindly ask if
hehehhe i do have some :)
Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http://opengis.ch
On 20 Jan 2014 22:27, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
I fully support all of Tims arguments..
I'd like to keep it too and especially the point of refering .. I
hardly heard the release number but more the
Hi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Marco Bernasocchi ma...@bernawebdesign.ch
wrote:
hehehhe i do have some :)
As long as you aren't actually *in* the picture it is all good :-)
Regards
Tim
Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http://opengis.ch
On 20 Jan 2014 22:27, Werner Macho
The new QGIS HF motto:
What goes on in the HF ... will be on to the splashscreen!
-Original Message-
From: Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com
To: Marco Bernasocchi ma...@bernawebdesign.ch
Cc: qgis-developer qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Reminder: Freeze starts
done:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1093
This patch hides the simplification rendering tab for point layers, now it is
not supported (internally I am not trying to simplify point layers). Thanks Tim!
About if there is a use case for point simplification, I know one, (gvSIG +
dielmo open
Hi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47 PM, A Huarte ahuart...@yahoo.es wrote:
done:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1093
This patch hides the simplification rendering tab for point layers, now
it is not supported (internally I am not trying to simplify point layers)
. Thanks Tim!
About if
Hi Radek,
There is the QgsAttributeTableFilterModel which is a proxy model to be
applied in front of the QgsAttributeTableModel, which allows you to
dynamically apply filters, while the request set to the table model
itself is rather static. With this one you can set the filter mode to
And, I wrote my reply wrong :-)
About point simplification, the strategy is no fetch in the featureiterator
some points using a tolerance.
Do you think that I must try it ?
De: Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com
Para: A Huarte ahuart...@yahoo.es
CC:
I suggest to deactivate the Select datum transformations dialog by default.
+1 agree
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Hi
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:11 AM, A Huarte ahuart...@yahoo.es wrote:
And, I wrote my reply wrong :-)
About point simplification, the strategy is no fetch in the
featureiterator some points using a tolerance.
Do you think that I must try it ?
If you have time and inclination this would
+1 to deactivate the dialog by default.
Tho the dialog is quite usefull, I can imagine people getting frustrated
for not understanding what is that dialog for. Those who understand can
find it elsewhere.
Alexandre Neto
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Giovanni Manghi
+1
- Nathan
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Alexandre Neto senhor.n...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 to deactivate the dialog by default.
Tho the dialog is quite usefull, I can imagine people getting frustrated
for not understanding what is that dialog for. Those who understand can
find it
HI,
Opening one of my 2.0 projects in 2.1 I'm getting this dialogue for
one of the layers. The layer is in AMG84zone 51 and opens fine in 2.0.
I can see what it's supposed to do, but as a user, it's really not
clear which one I'm supposed to pick.
I also don't see why it's suddenly causing
Hi Roberto,
2014/1/20 Geo DrinX geodr...@gmail.com:
I have some other suggestion :)
I am testing with more than one image and DTM files.
I find that, in this case, it would be useful to have an automatic selector
of the DTM or DSM layer (I don't know how, but, for example, it could be
+1, for two reasons:
* the advances function isn't needed for many types of qgis users
* the UI would benefit from re arrangements to make it more friendly when
users run into it (ie a short paragraph above list box to explain what this
is about, like with the crs selector)
On 21 Jan 2014 06:09,
Dnia poniedziałek, 20 stycznia 2014 18:35:50 Anita Graser pisze:
Hi,
I suggest to deactivate the Select datum transformations dialog by default.
+1
Fully agree with your remarks.___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Ok, I will study it
If you have time and inclination this would be great (note feature freeze
starts in 4 days). A logical starting may be to only return one point per map
pixel though I am not sure if you can push that kind of logic over to provider
side very easily.
Regards
Tim
Also, that logic can only be applied for fully opaque point symbols. As
soon as you have a semi transparent symbol, the repetition of points over a
same map pixel does matter and needs to be preserved.
On 21 Jan 2014 07:46, A Huarte ahuart...@yahoo.es wrote:
Ok, I will study it
If you have
Hmm, looks like it just sent an email that pretty much confirms this.
Can I ask, what caused this to pop up in 2.1 but not 2.0?
I'd be a lot less freaked if there was a description rather than a load of
numbers.
Particularly as the numbers don't immediately related to the proj parameters
for
Hi
Sent from my mobile
On 21 Jan 2014 3:10 AM, Mathieu Pellerin nirvn.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, that logic can only be applied for fully opaque point symbols. As
soon as you have a semi transparent symbol, the repetition of points over a
same map pixel does matter and needs to be preserved.
if there are more than one DTM_ layers, it could be
possible to have together clipped in the output ? Or, only one is possible
to have ?
Only one. You should merge DTM files into one in advance or make use
of vrt file.
If I well understand from documentation, a .vrt file is an xml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 21/01/2014 01:10, Mathieu Pellerin ha scritto:
+1, for two reasons:
* the advances function isn't needed for many types of qgis users
* the UI would benefit from re arrangements to make it more friendly when
users run
into it (ie a short
Hi,
2014/1/21 Geodrinx geodr...@gmail.com:
if there are more than one DTM_ layers, it could be
possible to have together clipped in the output ? Or, only one is possible
to have ?
Only one. You should merge DTM files into one in advance or make use
of vrt file.
If I well understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/01/2014 22:15, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
Regarding whether we should keep giving releases names, I think we should
(big +1)
for the following reasons:
Tim: quite convincing, agreed. Thanks.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS
I agree, It is not possible, or very costly, detect if a point has semi
transparent symbol
Maybe, new Point layers should have the simplification disabled by default
Alvaro
De: Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com
Para: Mathieu Pellerin nirvn.a...@gmail.com
CC:
Hi
I can live with either showing / not showing by default.
Just note that without showing, many people are receiving wrong
transformation results without any hint. In my opinion, a normal GIS
user should never have to do otf-reprojection, it is far to error prone
(better, let the surveying
A big +1 with Tim for the reasons he listed.
The Latvians should decide for 2.2 and Brighton for 2.4.
Andreas
Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com schrieb:
Hi
Regarding whether we should keep giving releases names, I think we
should
(big +1) for the following reasons:
* it (under our current
Hi,
The main problem for me is the modal popup which breaks the workflow
and it's not easy to grasp the meaning the first time you see it.
Alternatives:
Message bar:
Default transformation settings have been chosen for layers 'Moon' and
'Mars'. If you would like to change the settings please
63 matches
Mail list logo
