Hi Bernd,
On Sun, 23. Feb 2014 at 03:32:40 +0100, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:
In my struggle to manage to build QGIS from source, I finally found the
INSTALL-file on github. (No link to this from the website! At least I
couldn't find anything)
I also have the impression that the new website
Hi Larry,
On Sat, 22. Feb 2014 at 14:33:11 -0700, Larry Shaffer wrote:
How about for a set period of time, only commits that devs think can readily
be ported to the 2.2.0 branch are 'allowed' on master? With any code changes,
which would make porting changes/fixes over to the 2.2.0 branch
Am 23.02.2014, 10:03 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer j...@norbit.de:
Hi Bernd,
On Sun, 23. Feb 2014 at 03:32:40 +0100, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:
In my struggle to manage to build QGIS from source, I finally found the
INSTALL-file on github. (No link to this from the website! At least I
couldn't
Am 23.02.2014, 04:12 Uhr, schrieb Robert Szczepanek rob...@szczepanek.pl:
Hi Bernd,
(...) Finding all these infos (and sometimes not very congruentt ones)
in
different blogs and forums is ridiculously time-consuming. (...)
Several people invested time [1] to create QGIS.
You are welcome
Plugin Value Tool approval by etourigny.
The plugin version [32] Value Tool 0.8.1 is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/valuetool/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Hi,
On Sun, 23. Feb 2014 at 13:20:15 +0100, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:
This message was written to show a really minor mistake in the install
text on github,
Oh, sorry, I missed that. I was probably too concentrated on trying to explain
that version 1.16 is higher than 1.8. ;)
And when I
Plugin Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin approval by lucasupervised.
The plugin version [284] Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin 2.4.0 is now
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SemiAutomaticClassificationPlugin/
___
Qgis-developer
Hi,
Currently I get an error compiling master:
QGIS/src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool
QgsMapCanvas::event(QEvent*)’:
QGIS/src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp:1806:8: error: ‘mDrawing’ was not declared
in this scope
if ( mDrawing )
Best
Matthias
Hi Matthias
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi,
Currently I get an error compiling master:
QGIS/src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool
QgsMapCanvas::event(QEvent*)':
QGIS/src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp:1806:8: error: 'mDrawing' was
Hi all
this is a short note about the fact that multi-threaded rendering has
now landed in master, so from now on, you should be able to enojy
better experience when browsing your map (especially the fact that you
can keep using QGIS as usual even if rendering continues in the
background).
By
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 08:36:07AM +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On 23/02/2014 7:33 am, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com wrote:
How about for a set period of time, only commits that devs think can
readily be ported to the 2.2.0 branch are 'allowed' on master? With any
code changes, which
Just a remark, there are quite a few new warnings (mostly about deprecated
functions, but also some unused or variables or parameters) using gcc 4.7.3
Here are some, in no particular order, there might be more
/data/src/qgis/qgis-etiennesky/build-debug/src/core/moc_qgsmaplayer.cxx: In
static
Hi Etienne
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Etienne Tourigny
etourigny@gmail.com wrote:
Just a remark, there are quite a few new warnings (mostly about deprecated
functions, but also some unused or variables or parameters) using gcc 4.7.3
Here are some, in no particular order, there
I see, sorry I didn't check the actual code... I tried changing the
function to an inline one, but the moc file still triggers the deprecated
warning.
Unless there is an argument against it, I think Martin's suggestion to
disable deprecated warnings for moc files.
Etienne
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014
Hi
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Bernd Vogelgesang bernd.vogelges...@gmx.de
wrote:
HI,
In my struggle to manage to build QGIS from source, I finally found the
INSTALL-file on github. (No link to this from the website! At least I
couldn't find anything)
I just want to remark, that
HaH - I let them know.
Thanks for the help.
Randy
-
Randal Hale, GISP
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com
mailto:rjh...@northrivergeographic.com
twitter:rjhale
http://about.me/rjhale
On 02/22/2014
Hi Randal,
On Sun, 23. Feb 2014 at 18:27:42 -0500, Randal Hale wrote:
HaH - I let them know.
'They' already know, 'they' already fixed it in master (see #8662[1]),
now 'they' only have to update the package. ;)
Jürgen
[1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8662
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT
Awesome.
I feel like the kid running from one neighborhood to the other
neighborhood telling people things they already know. :)
Randy
-
Randal Hale, GISP
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com
Hi Randal,
On Sun, 23. Feb 2014 at 19:04:45 -0500, Randal Hale wrote:
Awesome.
I feel like the kid running from one neighborhood to the other
neighborhood telling people things they already know. :)
Thanks for re-raising this. Unfortunately the original report was closed
before the
That reminds me of someone mentioning in a ticket of a 2.0 issue resolved
against qgis 2.1 that he'd wait (angrily?) having fix backported into a
(mythical) 2.0.x update rather than him moving to 2.2 and having to deal
with possible regressions. I was thinking at the time that this sounds to
me
Martin,
Fantastic work; I knew to expect a better rendering experience, yet I was
caught by surprise at how much of a positive difference it makes.
Few things from my 10-minutes play with it:
* The map overview extend is broken, its extend goes way, way beyond the
extend of the sum of all the
Hi (Marco)
I have some suggestions for the implementation of datum transforms in
QGIS and I would like to hear your opinion about them.
In the 2.2 release, as far as I understand the logic is implemented like this:
- map renderer emits a signal asking for datum transform choice
- map canvas
On 24. 02. 14 03:17, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
QGIS could adopt: 4, or 2, weeks before the release date,
{beta,release candidate,tech preview,etc.} builds (from master, no
need to branch out really) are pushed out to osgeo4w linux and quite
loudly advertised (blog posts, social media, etc.) to
On 23. 02. 14 19:48, Pedro Venâncio wrote:
Hi,
Identify with Open feature form, if a single feature is identified opens both
Feature Form and Identify Results window.
Anyone confirms?
I confirm.
Very annoying!
Would be worth a 2.2.1 ...
___
Just to be clear, I don't think QGIS can handle more than one pre release.
The list of terminologies was just there as a pick one name you like :)
On 24 Feb 2014 13:22, Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24. 02. 14 03:17, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
QGIS could adopt: 4, or 2, weeks
Hi Mathieu,
On Mon, 24. Feb 2014 at 09:17:11 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
That reminds me of someone mentioning in a ticket of a 2.0 issue resolved
against qgis 2.1 that he'd wait (angrily?) having fix backported into a
(mythical) 2.0.x update rather than him moving to 2.2 and having to deal
26 matches
Mail list logo
