2014-12-22 5:09 GMT+01:00 Pierre-Luc Auclair p-l.aucl...@velourbain.qc.ca:
Hi Alessandro,
Nathan W asked me to write to you (and CC dev list) regarding taking over
development of the Space syntax analysis plugin which is currently abandoned
(I tried to contact the original owner a few times
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:07:32AM +, Ziegler Stefan wrote:
The jumping is gone when there is no rotation.
Thanks for testing. Martin merged the fix into master.
But it has some strange behaviour when drawing the zooming rectangle
with a rotated map (see attached image).
Known (by me)
Sandro,
Am I reading this as you are not doing any more rotation work? Are you
planning on fixing the bugs opened against the feature?
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 9:02 pm Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:07:32AM +, Ziegler Stefan wrote:
The jumping is gone when
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:09:06AM +, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
Am I reading this as you are not doing any more rotation work?
Right now I'm doing work on contextual WMS legend, which is funded.
Will get back to rotation later. Probably first or second week of January.
Are you planning on
Thanks for fixing the jumping issue for non-rotated canvas.
That said, I'm wondering whether the rotation feature should be exposed in
the status bar unless all of the basic canvas interactions are taught how
to deal with rotation (which inc. flawless zoom / pan experience and
probably north
On 22-12-14 12:37, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:09:06AM +, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
Am I reading this as you are not doing any more rotation work?
Right now I'm doing work on contextual WMS legend, which is funded.
Will get back to rotation later. Probably first or
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:18:05PM +0100, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
On 22-12-14 12:37, Sandro Santilli wrote:
I plan to make a call for funding to work on those bugs, but need to
find the time for that too. Maybe during christmas holidays.
If the feature is not ready for feature
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 08:46:01PM +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
Confirmed. I've added a QTreeView and it has the same issue.
Unfortunately, the model tester did not catch any issue, beside the
already-reported one
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:21:31PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 08:46:01PM +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
Confirmed. I've added a QTreeView and it has the same issue.
Unfortunately, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Il 22/12/2014 15:04, Sandro Santilli ha scritto:
The rotation functionality might be reported as not being complete
in the GUI allowing for enabling it.
Of course I'd prefer having all things working, but I just could
not raise enough
On 23 Dec 2014 5:11 am, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Il 22/12/2014 15:04, Sandro Santilli ha scritto:
The rotation functionality might be reported as not being complete
in the GUI allowing for enabling it.
Of
Sorry, gmail messed up my original reply:
On 23 Dec 2014 5:11 am, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
IMHO removing the function will make much more difficult to attract
interest and funding to complete the necessary features. My proposal:
add an option to add the rotation spinbox,
I agree with Nyall. I think putting hidden proof of concepts within an
official release doesn't put QGIS in a good light. It could be ok some time
ago, when QGIS was a niche, but not today. If a sponsorship campagin is
required to complete the development we should pursue different marketing
On Tue Dec 23 2014 at 8:57:26 AM G. Allegri gioha...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Nyall. I think putting hidden proof of concepts within an
official release doesn't put QGIS in a good light. It could be ok some time
ago, when QGIS was a niche, but not today. If a sponsorship campagin is
Sorry about that blank email. Hit ctrl enter really early.
On Tue Dec 23 2014 at 9:31:30 AM Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue Dec 23 2014 at 8:57:26 AM G. Allegri gioha...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Nyall. I think putting hidden proof of concepts within an
official
Hi,
I agree with Nyall. We need to be more strict with new features - if
they break other functionality. That's why we added the testing
integration. I value the work Sandro has done - but if it can't be
finished we need to roll it back and develop in a separate branch. There
are too many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nyall,
Il 22/12/2014 23:47, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
I disagree - while there may be an issue with the difficulty of getting
wide testing of pull requests, the solution isn't to allow broken code
into master.
You're right, we're big boys now,
17 matches
Mail list logo
