On 08-06-15 17:37, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 08/06/2015 17:35, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Hi all,
loading a large table requires the loading of all records. This is a
real performance killer, and effectively prevents the use of layers with
millions of records. Not a new issue, I know, but:
Hi Devs,
if you have some time, can you please add items at:
http://changelog.qgis.org/qgis/version/2.10/
so we can try to create a nice looking Visual Changelog again for Pisa?
Let us know about all the niceties you did this release :-)
Regards,
Richard Duivenvoorde
Perfect! Thanks a lot, Richard!
Andreas
On 08.06.2015 21:30, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
On 07-06-15 11:40, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to filter in hub.qgis.org the recently closed issue - say
I want to list the issues that had been closed in the past 2 weeks.
Hi Andreas,
Maybe a reiteration of this thread discussed on this list as
Struggling with iface.openFeatureForm()?
and this issue iface.openFeatureForm() does not update feature
https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11099 ?
-S.
2015-06-08 19:25 GMT+02:00 Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com:
Hi
I have a layer of Memory
On 07-06-15 11:40, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to filter in hub.qgis.org the recently closed issue - say
I want to list the issues that had been closed in the past 2 weeks.
Hi Andreas,
I've added a public query: 'Recently closed issues' which just queries
all closed issues
Hi
I have a layer of Memory storage type (Memory provider) which I
created with Python.
When editing=on and updating values using the attribute table
interactively everything works as expected, i.e. the record get's
updated.
Then I'm checking Auto open form to on.
Now, when updating the object
In Python, is it possible to retrieve the value for an HTML map tip:
Layer Properties Display Map tip display text HTML
I've been rooting around in the API, but haven't managed to find it.
Thanks
Tom
--
View this message in context:
Hi
On 09 Jun 2015, at 02:16, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.net wrote:
Hi Devs,
if you have some time, can you please add items at:
http://changelog.qgis.org/qgis/version/2.10/
so we can try to create a nice looking Visual Changelog again for Pisa?
Let us know about all
On 9 Jun 2015 1:07 pm, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com wrote:
Hi,
This can be fixed for Qt 4.8.x, but requires direct access to the Cocoa
API when needed to introduce the non-Qt-source workarounds noted in the
QTBUG-40449 [0].
Btw, this is an example of my old PR [1] to introduce
Hi,
This can be fixed for Qt 4.8.x, but requires direct access to the Cocoa API
when needed to introduce the non-Qt-source workarounds noted in the
QTBUG-40449 [0].
Btw, this is an example of my old PR [1] to introduce abstracted calls to
the OS (Mac for example, with Objective-C++) to handle
Il 08/06/2015 20:52, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
Not sure if it is related, but some things should be fixed already:
see https://hub.qgis.org/issues/10619
looking into the fix, it uses a spatial selection now...
It should be on 2.8.2 then - I cannot see an effect.
Thanks for the
Il 07/06/2015 21:27, Anita Graser ha scritto:
Works for me (no crashes) on OSGeo4W master nightly with airport sample
data.
Thanks Anita for testing. It is till possible that there is a packaging
problem for 2.8.2 on win32. Hopefully not.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Hi all.
Applying the Processing buffer on a memory layer returns an error:
2015-06-08T08:25:25 2 Uncaught error while executing algorithm
Traceback (most recent call last):| File
/home/paolo/python/plugins/processing/core/GeoAlgorithm.py, line 225,
in execute|
On 05/06/2015 16:46, Alexandre Neto wrote:
I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be working
as it should. Comparing a layer where the marker size is set to 50 and
another where we use 50 as an
Il 08/06/2015 07:02, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
You still have the same output as before. Everything that was logged
into the Processing log is now in a Processing tab in the QGIS log.
The only thing left in the sepoarate Processing history are the
executed commands, since that is an
Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Vincent Mora vincent.m...@oslandia.com
wrote:
Is the size-scale method set to Diameter ? If it's not the case (i.e.
scale method area), then a square root is applied if the size is defined by
an expression.
You are right, setting size-scale to
On Jun 8, 2015 10:03 AM, Vincent Mora vincent.m...@oslandia.com wrote:
On 05/06/2015 16:46, Alexandre Neto wrote:
I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be
working
as it should. Comparing a
I agree - a rename to size assistant or sizing assistant would be
useful. In my opinion, the new solution is not harder to find than the
old solution - which was pretty hard to find and even more disconnected
to the actual symbol than the new solution. I agree, it is still a bit
hidden, but it
You can use the instance of ModelerAlgorithmProvider that is stored in
the Processing object.
Like this:
model = ModelerAlgorithm.fromFile(Path/to/your/model/file)
model.provider = Processing.modeler
Processing.modeler.algs.append(model)
That will add your model to the list of available ones
I
Alexandre Neto wrote
Not sure if data-defined override for Symbol Size should even be connected
to the size-scale method, since in this case it should simply override the
symbol size value.
In master UI refactoring, area or diameter selector disappeared, and we now
have an assistant for that.
Hi,
I'm working on a plugin and I need to use my own model inside.
I know how to add a new algorithm in processing but I didn't find something
on how to add a model to processing.
Is there a way to ship my model with the plugin ?
Or do I need to copy manually my model into the processing models
Il 08/06/2015 17:35, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Hi all,
loading a large table requires the loading of all records. This is a
real performance killer, and effectively prevents the use of layers with
millions of records. Not a new issue, I know, but: is there anyone
working, or planning to, in
Hi all,
loading a large table requires the loading of all records. This is a
real performance killer, and effectively prevents the use of layers with
millions of records. Not a new issue, I know, but: is there anyone
working, or planning to, in order to improve this situation? Is there a
23 matches
Mail list logo
