Dear all,
I have a problem similar to the one I raised yesterday (
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2013-July/027423.html) but
this time with the network analysis module.
I just tried to follow this tutorial:
http://www.qgis.org/pyqgis-cookbook/network-analysis.html
It somehow
Dear all
I am trying to automate some OSM-data processing in Qgis but I get stuck
while importing the processing module.
No matter whether I do
*from processing.core.VectorWriter import VectorWriter*
or
*import processing.core.VectorWriter*
or
*import processing.core*
or
*import
As a non-Dev (only a user) and a non native English speaker:
- Yes to consistency!
- "Stroke" is also less clear to me than "Border" or "Outline". I would
prefer one of those 2 but I will not object if english-speakers think that
"stroke" is more correct
- Yes to keep the stroke /
As a user and not developer (again...), I could also live with my projects
being slightly broken (+1 for the short migration guide) if this is the
price to pay for a perfect consistency of the transparency / opacity
sliders.
In this case I would also favor "transparency" over "opacity"
And I
additional info offline.
Also, given the relatively low costs, I'd prefer to avoid a full-fledge
crowdsourcing campaign. Too much overhead.
Thanks a lot and all the best
Stéphane
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> upon advice
> than an ArcGIS license for sure), and if you think many people need this,
> then the money will be easy to raise.
>
> Alexandre Neto
>
> Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stephane...@gmail.com');>> escreveu no dia
>
janvier 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi
>
> let me move here a request that has been shortly discussed on the
> user-mailing list:
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2017-January/038793.html
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/
Hi all
is it known already when this will be incorporated into QGIS? In 3.0 or
earlier?
Thanks a lot in advance
Cheers
Stéphane
Le mardi 10 janvier 2017, Even Rouault a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I've updated to the EPSG v9.0 database.
>
>
>
> The relevant tickets
t; version, I will inquire a more precise financial estimation. Then
let's see how we can move forward!
Thanks and cheers
Stéphane
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Alexandre
>
> (also posting on user-)
>
> I 100% agree with
a tiny bit to its
development but I really feel this is one of the few major missing features
in QGIS right now (and will be happy to help on the feature requirements,
the tests, etc.).
All the best!
Stéphane
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a
écr
Hi
let me move here a request that has been shortly discussed on the
user-mailing list:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2017-January/038793.html
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2017-January/038795.html
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2017-January/038801.html
and
by the end
of this week so that we can quickly evaluate the financial options.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Stéphane
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> upon advice from Andreas, I started a formal description of the
Hi Anita
To go one step further :-) Any reason why it couldn't be polished and
directly integrated in the core? As a non-developer, I maybe underestimate
the workload here? Isn't it something that could "easily" be done by one of
the core developers without requiring substantial additional
://github.com/qgis/qgis3_UIX_discussion/issues/1 ?
Cheer
Stéphane
Le mardi 4 avril 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Thanks Nyall!
>
> Here I just created a Gdoc to collect info mentioned in your points 1-4 +
> a:
>
> https://do
ipt:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','anitagra...@gmx.at');>> a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> To go one step further :-) Any reason why it couldn't be polished and
>> directly integrated in the core? As
“When you travel, remember that a foreign country is not designed to make
you comfortable. It is designed to make its own people comfortable." --
Clifton Fadiman
2017-04-04 13:53 GMT+06:00 Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com>:
> On 4 April 2017 at 17:46, Stéphane Henriod <step
gt; list (we maybe can keep this thread) or, I guess until QGIS3 release, in
>> the qgis3_UIX_discussion repository.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harrissou
>>
>> 2017-04-05 10:19 GMT+02:00 Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stephane...@
gt; So, let's work together to find what are those missing pieces, and how it
> would be the best way to implement it. We will put our thoughts in the
> Google document. As soon we have it stabilized we can start creating a QEP
> for it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexandre Neto
>
> St
Hi all
while updating the doc to describe a future unique "Add data" button
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aMX9jOfl10q8oETRzOHSHnRpHCc7UJ1dDnCCq3VyTAY/edit?usp=sharing
I stumbled upon the *Project / DWG/DXF Import*.
2 questions here:
- Is there a reason why this import tool is stored
e else?
Cheers
Stéphane
Le lundi 17 avril 2017, Tudor Barascu <tudorbara...@yahoo.com> a écrit :
> Hi Stephane,
>
> That button is for importing DWG/DXF. It does the import into a Geopackage.
>
> Don't know why it's stored under "Project"
>
> All the best
Le lundi 17 avril 2017, Ramon Andinach <cust...@westnet.com.au> a écrit :
> I’m pretty sure it’s there because if you export to DXF you either export
> the view or the entire project - but either way it’s not just a single
> layer that’s affected.
>
> -ramon.
>
> On 17 Ap
Hi all
I must say that Anita's hack seems quite handy and straight forward from a
user's perspective. Would it be heavy to "just" integrate into the Master
QGIS? I would be happy to help with testing. More, I unfortunately cannot
do :-)
Cheers
Stéphane
Le lundi 3 avril 2017, Tim Sutton
n the ones we have in the manage
> layers toolbar in this first phase.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stephane...@gmail.com');>> escreveu no dia
> terça, 11/04/2017 às 12:57:
>
>> Hi Alexandre
>>
&g
Hi all
I have made a few tests of GDAL 2.2.0 on Ubuntu 16.04 with QGIS 2.14.14 and
have found out that most geoprocessing tools implying 2 layers (clip,
difference, intersection, etc.) wrongly give empty geometries when the data
is in CRS EPSG:7694 (*Kyrg06-3*, newly added CRS to GDAL in 2.2.0).
Wow this is a hell of a comprehensive answer :)
Thank you very much... My bad, I didn't even think about checking the
validity of the geometries here. I will correct them and make further tests
Cheers
Stéphane
On 28 Jul 2017 9:39 p.m., "Giovanni Manghi"
wrote:
>
on for you to move on and identify what can
realistically be done? Or is there a need for more polishing?
Thanks in advance!
Stéphane
Le vendredi 21 avril 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Done!
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aMX9jOfl10q8oETRzOHSHnRpHC
with ideas for it.
>
> So, let's wait for now.
>
> Thanks for your work.
>
> Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quinta,
> 27/04/2017 às 09:42:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I would be more than happy to help push this new feature forward bu
Dear all
We have, in Kyrgyzstan, a new national coordinate system (Kyrg-06) that has
been introduced in the EPSG 9.0 database. Does anyone know if / when this
will be available in QGIS?
There was an email from Even Rouault on this list on 10.01.2017 saying that
he has updated to EPSG 9.0 but, as
, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi again
>
> in doubt, I have opened a ticket here: https://issues.qgis.org/
> issues/16649
>
> Cheers
> Stéphane
>
>
> Le mardi 30 mai 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%
is it just that everybody is overloaded with other tasks but still
thinks this feature would be pretty damn cool? :-)
Thanks and cheers
Stéphane
Le mardi 6 juin 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> As recommended by Jorge, I just opened a QEP: https://github.com/qgis/
Hi
I am testing the layer styling panel (shortcut F7) with the latest Nightly
build on the Ubuntu repositories.
By default, the NoData value is -. If I add "10" as additional NoData
value, nothing happens.
If I do the same in the layer properties, then the expected behavior
happens: all
PS: screencast to better explain the issue: https://vimeo.com/219467091
Le mardi 30 mai 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I am testing the layer styling panel (shortcut F7) with the latest Nightly
> build on the Ubuntu repositories.
>
>
ou find a bug (a crash or something that doesn't work as
> expected) you should open an issue on the hub and assign it to me.
>
> For general feed-back or change proposal for the UI/UX you can either use
> this thread or make a PR with the proposed changes and discuss them in the
> the P
Hi Alessandro
replies inline
Le lundi 5 juin 2017, Alessandro Pasotti <apaso...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stephane...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alessandro
Thanks but I will wait for the nightly builds to be available on the Ubuntu
repositories! :-)
Le jeudi 1 juin 2017, Alessandro Pasotti <apaso...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ste
I really look forward to testing it :-) Thanks a lot for our involvement
here!
Le mercredi 31 mai 2017, Alessandro Pasotti a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> final update: the development of what was in phase 1 is done.
>
> Actually, a bit more than phase 1 considering that we've
Hi again
in doubt, I have opened a ticket here: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/16649
Cheers
Stéphane
Le mardi 30 mai 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> PS: screencast to better explain the issue: https://vimeo.com/219467091
>
> Le mardi 30 mai 2017, S
Hi all
jumping (a bit late) on this...
I realize that this would be much heavier and much more expensive to
implement but what about developing a "QGIS style" for OSM-based tiles
(that could, e.g., be hosted on QGIS.org)? That would take care of 3 issues:
- "Quality of the cartography": if
with more detailed info.
Would that be ok? (first time I open a QEP, so not quite sure about the
usual procedures and etiquette)
Cheers
Stéphane
Le mardi 6 juin 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi again
>
> if some are with me on this, let's try to work f
com> a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stephane...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I really look forward to testing it :-) Thanks a lot for our involvement
>> here!
>>
>>
ummary, providing the tile service seems more complicated to me, but
> this can be further explored. If you would like to try it, I can help.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jorge Gustavo
>
>
> Às 10:57 de 06-06-2017, Stéphane Henriod escreveu:
> > Hi all
> >
> >
With my little understanding, I would assume that the correction of this
bug is not a "big thing"? But maybe I am overlooking something
Thanks!
Stéphane
Le mercredi 21 juin 2017, Stéphane Henriod <stephane...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> Apparently, this ha
8, 2017 at 09:55:14PM +0600, Stéphane Henriod wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > just trying one last time to get attention on this bug :-)
> >
> > The bug is still present on the last 2.99
> >
> > As usual, I apologize for complaining while not being able to take ca
43 matches
Mail list logo